Should counties have the right to defy state laws?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,579 Votes

Should counties have the right to defy state laws?

Yes, if counties should be able to!

11

No, they should abide state laws!

9

Yes, if counties should be able to!

11 Comments
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

We have to get Oregon out of the Democrat's hands and their destructive ways!

Reply
Sussie Due
0
Sussie Due

Federal law trumps state or local laws...UNLESS the state or local laws benefit then the state or local laws prevail. For example. If a federal law says you cannot protect yourself but a state or local law says you can, then the helpful law prevails. Its been like that for years.

Reply
Kimra Tollefson
0
Kimra Tollefson

The state is no longer representing the people. The laws are contrary to the Constitution. The government is betraying its own people.

Reply
Andy Dobrinin
0
Andy Dobrinin

Local control of government. No laws shall be passed that infringe on individuals rights. 2 ND amendment is for the citizens to maintain control of their own person and their government. Without it the country will fail.

Reply
Dawn Williams
0
Dawn Williams

When laws are contradictory to the Constitution they should not be enforced. When tyranny becomes law disobedience become necessary! STOP VOTING FOR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS

Reply
Kelly Jones
0
Kelly Jones

The right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

If the state can defy federal laws, the counties should be able to defy state laws.

Reply
Tarasem
Tarasem

Laws are anti-freedom.

Mary M
0
Mary M

Depending on what they are? In this case for guns yes because the State is going against the Constitution for our 2nd amendment right.. "SHALL NOT INFRINGE" SAYS IT ALL!!!

Reply
P Robbins
P Robbins

That's not what the Supreme Court said in Heller.

Matt Cyrus
0
Matt Cyrus

Every elected official takes an oath to uphold the Constitution and are obligated to ignore any law they believe to believe to be unconstitutional.

Reply
P Robbins
P Robbins

No. The Supreme Court decides what is or is not Constitutional, not individuals.

Robert Northrup
0
Robert Northrup

Multnomah County doesn't follow the laws. Portland is quickly becoming like Chicago. Crime and murder are on the rise all over Oregon. Oregon, California and Washington are being destroyed by democrats.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Conservative counties should defy liberal laws

Reply
Tarasem
Tarasem

Everybody should defy all laws.

No, they should abide state laws!

4 Comments
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

No but, they have the right (and should benefit from it) to deviate from the FEDERAL norms and mandates when warranted. You know the goose and the gander comparisons don't you?..........Same here!

Reply
k san
0
k san

I can't even believe this is a question!! Of course, they should!

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

Well, because that's the system in place to protect EVERYONE'S welfare, whether we like every specific law or not.

Reply
P Robbins
0
P Robbins

Laws are for everyone. Without our laws we have anarchy. This is a ridiculous question for a "poll".

Reply
Tarasem
Tarasem

Laws are anti freedom.

Do you have your real ID or an appointment scheduled to get one?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
181 Votes

Do you have your real ID or an appointment scheduled to get one?

Yes

1

No

1

Yes

1 Comment
Anne King
0
Anne King

I got the passport card instead - online, no waiting in line.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

It's bs. I have an id.

Reply
Do you think this suspect should be allowed to keep his dogs as his case unfolds?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
179 Votes

Do you think this suspect should be allowed to keep his dogs as his case unfolds?

Yes

0

No

3

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

2 Comments
d p
1
d p

Are you Fing kidding?

Reply
k san
k san

Exactly! This awful man should never be allowed to own animals for the rest of his life! Once an abuser, always an abuser. No matter that he is a vet. It doesn't excuse this abusive behavior, especially over tiny dogs!

Lisa York
0
Lisa York

I don't think he should get his dogs back until a psych eval is done and he's deemed ok to own an animal. I also think that your reporter's continued hounding of him for an interview after he clearly declined was appropriate or professional.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT