Central Oregon's News Leader - KTVZ NewsChannel 21, Bend, Oregon
Do you agree with Deschutes County's RV time limits on private property?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,701 Votes

Do you agree with Deschutes County's RV time limits on private property?

Yes, I support this code!

2

No, they shouldn't have a time limit!

24

Yes, I support this code!

2 Comments
Larry Yeargan
2
Larry Yeargan

I tried to find the actual Deschutes County Code that regulates RV time limits on private property, to no avail, so I don't know when it went in to effect. The person of interest has been in this situation for two decades, and should be excluded from the code due to a grandfather clause.

Reply
Robert Northrup
1
Robert Northrup

We have most laws for common sense reasons. Unfortunately in recent years we seem to have people who have no common sense making laws. And governments that determine which laws they will enforce and which they will not based on political views.

Reply

No, they shouldn't have a time limit!

24 Comments
Kimmy Wasatch
3
Kimmy Wasatch

If RVs can park on public streets, with garbage, waste, junk, etc all around them and on the streets, block traffic forever why would you limit them on private property. The county should focus on that instead of going after a a RV on private property , Disgusting to evict from private property.

Reply
Sheri Clarke
2
Sheri Clarke

Its their property, their business!

Reply
Cari Brown
2
Cari Brown

Private property. Housing shortage. Multi-generational co-habitation. Homelessness.

Reply
Johnny Mooney
2
Johnny Mooney

My property, my decision!

Reply
Anna Ivins
2
Anna Ivins

Lack of affordable housing, if you are a single person with an average wage job it is far to expensive to rent a house. I know a lot of people that live in RV's full time. And I do not think it should be up to anyone but them how long they live in them.

Reply
Sussie Due
2
Sussie Due

They have no right to tell a person who can and who cannot live on their property.

Reply
Lanette Dunham Smeltzer
2
Lanette Dunham Smeltzer

It should be up to the owner/taxpayer, law abiding citizen! Squatters have more rights than owners! It's absolutely ridiculous!! This needs to change, especially in today's economy.

Reply
Andrea Gibb
2
Andrea Gibb

People should be able to do what they want with their own property that they own & pay taxes on.

Reply
George Robirts
2
George Robirts

To me it's just another way some are trying to stomp out those less fortunate than themslves because they feel these people and their ways of trying to survive with dignity cause them and the communities we live in look bad because they can't aford things as nice as they have. So sad.

Reply
Pennie Holiday
2
Pennie Holiday

This is an elderly woman that has done no wrong. She should be Grandfathered in because of the amount years she has lived there.

Reply
Dianne Price
2
Dianne Price

Maybe the property owner can get a "hardship permit'?? What "good " neighbor turned her in?? We had a similar problem, a few years ago. We had our RV stored on the back of our property & got turned in!! Police came out twice to see!! They told our "neighbor" to leave us alone!!

Reply
Michele Davis
2
Michele Davis

Because there are to many homeless people right now and lots live on private property in RV's because they can't afford to rent or buy a house and I think it should be up to the land owner/ rent who stays on the property with them.

Reply
bookmaid1
2
bookmaid1

There is a major shortage of affordable housing in this area. Living in an RV for many is one step away from homelessness.

Reply
Mark Ford
2
Mark Ford

The county's time limit should have a time limit. Report a problem within 1? 3? 6? or 12? months or maybe it isn't a problem.

Reply
Chris G
2
Chris G

It's kinda ironic that this question follows the homeless camp survey. So, if I get this right...let's limit RV's on PAYING private property but let broken down non paying RV's sit on city/county roads indefinitely? Riiiiiiiiight.

Reply
k san
1
k san

Like many others, I think a property owner should be the sole determinant of who and for how long someone lives in an RV on their personal property.

Reply
Chrystal Jaden
1
Chrystal Jaden

Two words: PRIVATE Property

Reply
Geraldine Boldman Goodson
1
Geraldine Boldman Goodson

It's private property and they should decide if they (the owners) want her there

Reply
Steve Carchidi
0
Steve Carchidi

It's private property

Reply
Bradaigh Holt
0
Bradaigh Holt

Private means private.

Reply
Judy Ostrom-Dixon
0
Judy Ostrom-Dixon

As long as they are not dumping black water, no problem. Private property is just that, private. There is also a difference between 1 RV and an RV park, private property is not a park!!!!

Reply
Rondo
0
Rondo

Is this law, or policy. Let's elect a non-Partisan Commissioner that will end this insanity. The reasons are many, and obvious.

Reply
Davon Herbert
0
Davon Herbert

With housing so hard to find, and for many so hard to even afford I think people should be allowed to live in motorhomes/trailers with no time limits. For some this is their only option.

Reply
Do you think local ownership of Mt. Bachelor is possible?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
202 Votes

Do you think local ownership of Mt. Bachelor is possible?

YES

1

NO

0

YES

1 Comment
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

It's happened elsewhere.

Reply

NO

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Did you make a trip to the Oregon Zoo this year?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
106 Votes

Did you make a trip to the Oregon Zoo this year?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT