Is Obama's Executive Action on Gun Control Unconstitutional? Why?
77%
Yes
WINNER
77%
22
23%
No
23%
2
77%
Yes
77%
because it goes against the constitution, it makes the medical professionals breached their oths to their profession and give info about their patients...and I don't think executive orders have autho
ReplyThis is one mans opinion of a so called problem, that they might have propagated.To change anything I think you need congressional votes. There is also two houses for a reason.
ReplyWe have the right to bare arms. It introduces total control by the government.
ReplyBECAUSE IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Replyto protect one's self from bad people'
ReplyWe have the right to own guns by the constitution for hunting & protection.
ReplyI mean duh he does not make law only kings do that
ReplyIt fits my profile
ReplyRespect for Constitution
Replycuz i know it is
ReplyCongress is supposed to be part of the government. at least it used to be.
ReplyBecause the real reason is to have citizens unprepared to resist upcoming martial law
ReplyExecutive orders are not LAW.......Only Congress can do that!
Replyuntil humanity wakes up and gets off this profit,greed,based society then we are always going to have to defend ourselves. As soon as the guns get taken away its game over.
ReplyBecause it's unconstitutional. Executive orders are not law, they just want you to think they are.
Replybecause the 2nd amendment trumps a self professed king
ReplyObama is a criminal pure and simple but does Obama really make any decisions at all or is he just a puppet.
ReplyRight to carry arms, it's in the constitution
ReplyBecause of the wording of the Second Amendment.
Replybecause phones and pens dont count when dealing with constitutional issues
Replybecause the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
ReplyI own a gun and it has never shot me yet!
Reply