KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should the state move forward with Measure 114?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
4/11/2023

Should the state move forward with Measure 114?

16%
Yes

2

84%
No WINNER

21

16%
Yes

1 Comments
hi
0
hi

The people have spoken.

Reply

84%
No

17 Comments
Ron Johnson
5
Ron Johnson

Why should 3-4 countys tell the rest of the state what to do.

Reply
P Robbins
P Robbins

because they comprise most of the *people*

Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
4
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

M-114 will do nothing to keep guns from the hands of criminals. M-114 only works to further prevent the law biding citizen from their legal right to purchase a firearm

Reply
Poo
2
Poo

Unconstitutional. “Assault Weapons” a term that the ATF has struggled to define and most modern countries define as select fire aka full auto. Red flag laws still let people drive vehicles, own knives and other deadly weapons. Blame the bad people not a piece of metal!

Reply
Your Face
2
Your Face

Shouldn't even be up for discussion. Move somewhere else if you are afraid of armed law abiding citizens.

Reply
William Chivers
2
William Chivers

All this measure does is it makes it harder for law abiding citizens to own firearms. No matter how hard we try to keep firearms away from those who shouldn't have them, those people will always figure out how to get them. I believe crime would be better deterred if open carry were legal.

Reply
Kenneth Converse
Kenneth Converse

Open carry is legal. Conceal carry without a permit is illegal.

Alexander Hada
2
Alexander Hada

Law empowers and gives carte blanche to police to decide who gets a firearm. Which means marginalized LGBT+ and POC will be denied in favor of right wing extremists. Would also increase policing in POC communities via magazine ban & also create a database that would target marginalized communities.

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

Oh baloney.

Jim Newton
2
Jim Newton

Measure 114 has several concerning components that likely violate the US constitution, cause an undue burden on the local police and is essentially a money/tax black hole.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
2
Latterdaysaint

It's against the 2nd amendment

Reply
Paul Owen
1
Paul Owen

It would be the toughest gun law in the United States and as well seen in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York City and look at Australia. Tough Gun laws do not work I am not against the background checks, I think that religion needs to stay out of politics and use their money to spread Christianity

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

Sorry, I'll take my Christianity any where I please.

Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

Even Jesus said to sell your cloak an buy a sword.

sandra zollman
0
sandra zollman

Government needs to stop trying to destroy our Constitutional rights. 114 is the Democrats means to deny guns to those that "don't pass our tests". Taking a shooting class is just another tax and has nothing to do with gun owning rights. It is not governments business to know who owns guns.

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

How about locking up criminals instead? They have no regard for a "Law" in the first place.

Reply
Jerry Springer
0
Jerry Springer

“Shall not infringe “

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

No absolutely not. The constitution is what it is to keep unconstitutional things like this from happening. 114 is in violation of the second amendment and would do harm not any good. It will not keep criminals from getting guns, it will hamper honest people. Backwards thinking.

Reply
Jonathan Wichunu
0
Jonathan Wichunu

Measure 114 is unconstitutional. It should never have made it onto the ballot.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

When will people understand that the violence is a people probLem and not a gun problem. Until people are held accountable, charged and not realesed early or without bail, nothing will change. Decrimalizing drugs contributes to the problem. Too much liberal, left policies.

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
327 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

11

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

11 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Jim Terry
0
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply
Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT