KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should the federal government remove most vaccination exemptions?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,509 Votes

Should the federal government remove most vaccination exemptions?

Yes!

3

No!

27

Yes!

3 Comments
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

Just waiting for TB and Small Pox to make a comeback all because of a hoax by Dr. Wakefield and the idiots who believed him.

Reply
Sharlene Pinckney
0
Sharlene Pinckney

WE DONT NEED DISEASES SPREED

Reply
Leah Otero-Bunker
0
Leah Otero-Bunker

It’s a basic human right to choose medical freedom .. they government shouldn’t be the ones forcing injections.

Reply

No!

24 Comments
Charlie Plate
1
Charlie Plate

The constitution says no

Reply
Pamela Richter
1
Pamela Richter

If you look at the list of ingredients in some vaccines, I would not allow those toxins in my own body, and definitely not my children's. No government should have the right to force people!

Reply
Thea Weinberger
1
Thea Weinberger

Because there are no studies showing vaccines are completely safe, along with the toxic ingredients, and vaccine manufactures not being held liable for vaccine injuries. Too much to add!

Reply
Stephanie Blair
1
Stephanie Blair

Why should the government be allowed to do anything forcefully to any citizen's body? NO NO NO

Reply
Jannie Annie
1
Jannie Annie

There are legitimate medical reasons why vaccinating is ill advised & doctors must be able to write exemptions for those patients. Also, personal & religious beliefs are constitutionally protected.

Reply
Stormy Hubka
1
Stormy Hubka

The government shouldn't force anybody to inject anything in their body..it's unconstitutional

Reply
Jennifer VonKrosigk
1
Jennifer VonKrosigk

We should always have the right to informed consent especially with an injection that is unavoidably unsafe containing aluminum ( a neurotoxin), animal and human dna fragments, polysorbate 80 etc etc

Reply
Mynista Reynolds
1
Mynista Reynolds

VAERS and $4 BILLION in payouts for injuries tell me that vaccines are not safe and should ALWAYS be a choice.

Reply
Lacey Raye
1
Lacey Raye

Forcing/coercing people to consume vaccines is against the Nuremberg Code. We are sovereign citizens; our bodies are quintessential private property.

Reply
Jacklynn Bosley
1
Jacklynn Bosley

My son is vaccine injured. He can not process and detox vaccines properly. It caused him to suffer from vaccine induced brain damage otherwise medically diagnosed as severe autism. He is non verbal.

Reply
Sim 83
Sim 83

Our hearts go out to you our son soon to be 7 years old is verbal but has most of the red flags of Autism, SPD, he may have been given the oral polio vaccine after being born without our knowledge.

Erin Cole
1
Erin Cole

Where there is risk involved there must be choice. Period.

Reply
Amelia Rodriguez-Caldera
0
Amelia Rodriguez-Caldera

The government has NO business mandating anything on myself or my children. Where there is RISK there must be CHOICE

Reply
Alison Derum
0
Alison Derum

Forcing an untested liability free product brought to us by the makers of Vioxx?? NO THANKS

Reply
Breeauna Sagdal
0
Breeauna Sagdal

Mandatory vaccination violates the Nuremburg code, AND the constitution! We when we no longer have bodily autonomy we're nothing more than slaves! My body MY CHOICE!

Reply
Sim 83
0
Sim 83

Our bodies our children our choice, Herd Immunity Means Strong Natural Immunity not man enhanced compromised immunity!

Reply
Crystal Townsend
0
Crystal Townsend

Because it goes against our rights and even if we NEED a medical exemption it's almost impossible to get one especially for those of us on government insurance.

Reply
Stockmaster Karis
0
Stockmaster Karis

This is NOT about vaccines, this is about FREEDOM of CHOICE! There is not a single medical procedure that should be FORCED on anyone. The government may NOT tell me what to put in my body!

Reply
John Fredrick
0
John Fredrick

Because I am not a communist psychopath.

Reply
Ashlee Novak Snyder
0
Ashlee Novak Snyder

https://www.facebook.com/669084493234593/posts/1332850513524651?sfns=mo

Reply
Debbie Middleton
0
Debbie Middleton

Hell no! Feds have no right to a personal choice! You open this can if worms it will spiral. What's next?

Reply
Brittani Plumlee
0
Brittani Plumlee

Body autonomy is not a joke.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Look and the ingrediants and use alternative medicine with it

Reply
Ka San
0
Ka San

We have already weighed in on this issue in a previous poll. Kids whose parents choose not to vaccinate them shoud not be allowed to attend school and put other kids at risk.

Reply
Ka San
Ka San

I responded in the wrong column. The govt should definitely remove most exemptions to vaccinations. Kids whose parents don't vaccinate, should not be allowed to attend school and risk other kids.

Sim 83
Sim 83

You are so misguided it's sad you and your kind have been vaccinated against the truth, you will all suffer for your lack of awareness. Educate Yourself Before It's Too Late! http://tinyurl.com/zszmw5

Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

No, no, no! Always trying to find a way to get their nose in the tent. Are you naive enough to believe it would stop there?!!

Reply
Do you support red light cameras?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
586 Votes

Do you support red light cameras?

Yes

1

No

9

Yes

1 Comment
Loy Helmly
0
Loy Helmly

Increased traffic in Bend has brought more traffic woes. I have personally seen drivers increase speed or run red lights to get through intersections at the last minute. These cameras are needed safety features

Reply

No

9 Comments
John Bryant
0
John Bryant

This will lead to a surveillance state which I am opposed to.

Reply
Peter O'Neill
0
Peter O'Neill

They don’t take into account circumstances that happen all the time. This is why cops don’t always give you a ticket when they see you do it. I do not believe taking the human element out of law enforcement is effective. I do not believe these cameras should be legal.

Reply
Kodiak Malmstrom
0
Kodiak Malmstrom

More Government control. Give us statistics where it saved lives. Charging it's already extremely highly taxed citizens is ridiculous. It issues the owner of the car the citation who may not even be driving. Insurance goes up or is canceled causing low income drivers to drive without insurance.

Reply
Jordan Opdycke
0
Jordan Opdycke

At reed mkt and 3rd its already common to take 3 cycles of light changes to make it through. This will make it so people feel have to go slower contributing to the delay that already exists because of poorly planned infrastructure

Reply
Mt Man
0
Mt Man

All it is going to do overall, is produce more revenue and cause insurance rates of individuals to go up. It takes the real time needed judgment out of the equation by an officer. Clearly, infractions happen over small nuances or when in the dilemma zone. Put a big sign up would have the same effect

Reply
J F
0
J F

These aren't about safety. They are about revenue. And the fact that these 'tickets' are signed off by an 'officer' in another state and don't go on your driving record are proof.

Reply
Melissa Hunter
0
Melissa Hunter

Relying on technology to do the job of officers is not efficient reason for 2.3 million dollar project ,especially. When we just put more officers on the ground the last year.What was the need for more officers?.

Reply
Thomas Barrier iv
0
Thomas Barrier iv

Because it boost the pockets of the city, and takes from the people. It will not reduce car accidents that much, it's only for revenue for the politicians. And it's been proven that they don't work that great. This is just another Ponzi scheme to collect money from the public to line there pockets.

Reply
Judy Corwin
0
Judy Corwin

Try a rotary Peace Poll

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
497 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

17

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

17 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jim Terry
1
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

Irony: “It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights…” Charlie Kirk 2023

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely NOT!! He was a racist extraordinaire and spread divisive speech and ideas.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT