KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should the federal government remove most vaccination exemptions?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,509 Votes

Should the federal government remove most vaccination exemptions?

Yes!

3

No!

27

Yes!

3 Comments
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

Just waiting for TB and Small Pox to make a comeback all because of a hoax by Dr. Wakefield and the idiots who believed him.

Reply
Sharlene Pinckney
0
Sharlene Pinckney

WE DONT NEED DISEASES SPREED

Reply
Leah Otero-Bunker
0
Leah Otero-Bunker

It’s a basic human right to choose medical freedom .. they government shouldn’t be the ones forcing injections.

Reply

No!

24 Comments
Charlie Plate
1
Charlie Plate

The constitution says no

Reply
Pamela Richter
1
Pamela Richter

If you look at the list of ingredients in some vaccines, I would not allow those toxins in my own body, and definitely not my children's. No government should have the right to force people!

Reply
Thea Weinberger
1
Thea Weinberger

Because there are no studies showing vaccines are completely safe, along with the toxic ingredients, and vaccine manufactures not being held liable for vaccine injuries. Too much to add!

Reply
Stephanie Blair
1
Stephanie Blair

Why should the government be allowed to do anything forcefully to any citizen's body? NO NO NO

Reply
Jannie Annie
1
Jannie Annie

There are legitimate medical reasons why vaccinating is ill advised & doctors must be able to write exemptions for those patients. Also, personal & religious beliefs are constitutionally protected.

Reply
Stormy Hubka
1
Stormy Hubka

The government shouldn't force anybody to inject anything in their body..it's unconstitutional

Reply
Jennifer VonKrosigk
1
Jennifer VonKrosigk

We should always have the right to informed consent especially with an injection that is unavoidably unsafe containing aluminum ( a neurotoxin), animal and human dna fragments, polysorbate 80 etc etc

Reply
Mynista Reynolds
1
Mynista Reynolds

VAERS and $4 BILLION in payouts for injuries tell me that vaccines are not safe and should ALWAYS be a choice.

Reply
Lacey Raye
1
Lacey Raye

Forcing/coercing people to consume vaccines is against the Nuremberg Code. We are sovereign citizens; our bodies are quintessential private property.

Reply
Jacklynn Bosley
1
Jacklynn Bosley

My son is vaccine injured. He can not process and detox vaccines properly. It caused him to suffer from vaccine induced brain damage otherwise medically diagnosed as severe autism. He is non verbal.

Reply
Sim 83
Sim 83

Our hearts go out to you our son soon to be 7 years old is verbal but has most of the red flags of Autism, SPD, he may have been given the oral polio vaccine after being born without our knowledge.

Erin Cole
1
Erin Cole

Where there is risk involved there must be choice. Period.

Reply
Amelia Rodriguez-Caldera
0
Amelia Rodriguez-Caldera

The government has NO business mandating anything on myself or my children. Where there is RISK there must be CHOICE

Reply
Alison Derum
0
Alison Derum

Forcing an untested liability free product brought to us by the makers of Vioxx?? NO THANKS

Reply
Breeauna Sagdal
0
Breeauna Sagdal

Mandatory vaccination violates the Nuremburg code, AND the constitution! We when we no longer have bodily autonomy we're nothing more than slaves! My body MY CHOICE!

Reply
Sim 83
0
Sim 83

Our bodies our children our choice, Herd Immunity Means Strong Natural Immunity not man enhanced compromised immunity!

Reply
Crystal Townsend
0
Crystal Townsend

Because it goes against our rights and even if we NEED a medical exemption it's almost impossible to get one especially for those of us on government insurance.

Reply
Stockmaster Karis
0
Stockmaster Karis

This is NOT about vaccines, this is about FREEDOM of CHOICE! There is not a single medical procedure that should be FORCED on anyone. The government may NOT tell me what to put in my body!

Reply
John Fredrick
0
John Fredrick

Because I am not a communist psychopath.

Reply
Ashlee Novak Snyder
0
Ashlee Novak Snyder

https://www.facebook.com/669084493234593/posts/1332850513524651?sfns=mo

Reply
Debbie Middleton
0
Debbie Middleton

Hell no! Feds have no right to a personal choice! You open this can if worms it will spiral. What's next?

Reply
Brittani Plumlee
0
Brittani Plumlee

Body autonomy is not a joke.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Look and the ingrediants and use alternative medicine with it

Reply
Ka San
0
Ka San

We have already weighed in on this issue in a previous poll. Kids whose parents choose not to vaccinate them shoud not be allowed to attend school and put other kids at risk.

Reply
Ka San
Ka San

I responded in the wrong column. The govt should definitely remove most exemptions to vaccinations. Kids whose parents don't vaccinate, should not be allowed to attend school and risk other kids.

Sim 83
Sim 83

You are so misguided it's sad you and your kind have been vaccinated against the truth, you will all suffer for your lack of awareness. Educate Yourself Before It's Too Late! http://tinyurl.com/zszmw5

Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

No, no, no! Always trying to find a way to get their nose in the tent. Are you naive enough to believe it would stop there?!!

Reply
Should there be better vetting of candidates and reporting in the voters pamphlet?

Should there be better vetting of candidates and reporting in the voters pamphlet?

Yes

2

No

0

Yes

2 Comments
Lisa York
0
Lisa York

EVERYTHING submitted by the candidates for inclusion in the voter's pamphlet should be thoroughly vetted!!!

Reply
Marie Gilbert
0
Marie Gilbert

Because he is an elected official and should be 100% honest.

Reply

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,004 Votes

Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?

YES

3

NO

21

YES

3 Comments
Louis Vaday
0
Louis Vaday

This made an error! I voted NO and it recorded yes! They shouldn't {and ALL} shouldn't be allowed on all public land because they do not follow rules! Dumping garbage, open flames during fire season, over extending time stay, etc. And now because of them our insurance is going up and land value goin

Reply
Brad Hunter
0
Brad Hunter

Because they are steam rolling the homeless

Reply

NO

21 Comments
Tammy Salka
1
Tammy Salka

The homeless are not residents, they are squatters!

Reply
Kayla Sulak
1
Kayla Sulak

These people have had MONTHS of notice. Nobody ever told them it's acceptable to post up long-term there, so they shouldn't have planted their belongings out there if they have no way to move it. This sets a bad precedent if they're allowed to stay.

Reply
Richard Williams
1
Richard Williams

I can no longer use this area of public land for fear of walking into a homeless camp or being attacked by their "pets". This land is for all of us to use, not just the homeless.

Reply
Joanna Lee
1
Joanna Lee

Safety should be the biggest concern here. If these people are homeless, they can travel to another area to reside. Forest service doesn't always implement preventative measures. So this being one of the times they do. Its important to make sure it happens. Before there is anymore devastating fires.

Reply
Shane Murray
1
Shane Murray

The homeless have trashed the forest out there. It makes me sick

Reply
Greg Deadbolt Leach
1
Greg Deadbolt Leach

Time to move these people to the Attorneys and Judges front lawns!!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
1
Karen Thrower

The China Hat area has been badly damaged and disrespected by campers.

Reply
Jeannie H.
1
Jeannie H.

How is this their "home"? Have they paid property tax like the rest of us? How is this state even justifying this?!?!

Reply
Nancy
1
Nancy

They’ve had plenty of time to move. Why can the homeless trash/burn our beautiful forest? Tax paying citizens are only allowed to camp for 14 days! What about the homeowners rights near China Hat, they need to feel safe in their own community! This has gone on way too long and I’m surprised!

Reply
Lynn Marie Leehmann
1
Lynn Marie Leehmann

If you look at the Federal Regulations for camping on Federal land it states only 14 days. These people have over stated their welcome, they need to go and they have known about this for at least six months.

Reply
Brad Aimone
1
Brad Aimone

It is ironic the Bend Equity Group has filed a lawsuit to block the closure. Where is the indignation for the horrible environmental damage done by these campers who’ve violated the USFS long standing limit of a 14 day stay in a primitive camp site?

Reply
Nancy Roquero
1
Nancy Roquero

This has gone on too long. The forests near Woodside community and other neighborhoods need fire protection and protection from the homeless with guns and vicious dogs and the garbage left behind. The homeless have had plenty of notice.

Reply
Lisa York
1
Lisa York

the USFS has been planning this burn since Oct 2019... more than enough time for the homeless/advocacy groups to come up with a plan to move...

Reply
Debbie Boyd
1
Debbie Boyd

This has been going on for way too long & it is ridiculous to postpone as they have known this needs to be done. The forest needs to be protected & these do gooders are too late to the game & so much time & money spent on homeless with ZERO results. We need DOGE. for Oregon!

Reply
Marie Gilbert
0
Marie Gilbert

We live near China Hat and the fear of fire and crime is constant. Plus the forest is being destroyed by illegal cutting of trees, garbage and toxins

Reply
Bendlover
0
Bendlover

I haven't felt safe hiking or biking there for years due to the aggressive homeless people out there.

Reply
Pam
0
Pam

We need to ensure that the lands are managed for the enjoyment/needs of all peoples, not a select few

Reply
pamcuny
0
pamcuny

I worry every year WHO is in the woods starting fires, whether deliberate or unintentional consequences…

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

I live near China Hat and used to love going out the with my dog. Once weapons started be pulled on people that stopped. I want my forest back. Good riddance to the whole lot. Don't ever come back.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

There needs to be more homeless shelters in the city!

Reply
Kim Kahl
0
Kim Kahl

The danger of fire starting in this area is incredibly high and impacts large subdivisions. It is mandatory to close this area for the safety of all. This should not be a place for camping to be allowed as it has been.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT