KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should the federal government remove most vaccination exemptions?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,509 Votes

Should the federal government remove most vaccination exemptions?

Yes!

3

No!

27

Yes!

3 Comments
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

Just waiting for TB and Small Pox to make a comeback all because of a hoax by Dr. Wakefield and the idiots who believed him.

Reply
Sharlene Pinckney
0
Sharlene Pinckney

WE DONT NEED DISEASES SPREED

Reply
Leah Otero-Bunker
0
Leah Otero-Bunker

It’s a basic human right to choose medical freedom .. they government shouldn’t be the ones forcing injections.

Reply

No!

24 Comments
Charlie Plate
1
Charlie Plate

The constitution says no

Reply
Pamela Richter
1
Pamela Richter

If you look at the list of ingredients in some vaccines, I would not allow those toxins in my own body, and definitely not my children's. No government should have the right to force people!

Reply
Thea Weinberger
1
Thea Weinberger

Because there are no studies showing vaccines are completely safe, along with the toxic ingredients, and vaccine manufactures not being held liable for vaccine injuries. Too much to add!

Reply
Stephanie Blair
1
Stephanie Blair

Why should the government be allowed to do anything forcefully to any citizen's body? NO NO NO

Reply
Jannie Annie
1
Jannie Annie

There are legitimate medical reasons why vaccinating is ill advised & doctors must be able to write exemptions for those patients. Also, personal & religious beliefs are constitutionally protected.

Reply
Stormy Hubka
1
Stormy Hubka

The government shouldn't force anybody to inject anything in their body..it's unconstitutional

Reply
Jennifer VonKrosigk
1
Jennifer VonKrosigk

We should always have the right to informed consent especially with an injection that is unavoidably unsafe containing aluminum ( a neurotoxin), animal and human dna fragments, polysorbate 80 etc etc

Reply
Mynista Reynolds
1
Mynista Reynolds

VAERS and $4 BILLION in payouts for injuries tell me that vaccines are not safe and should ALWAYS be a choice.

Reply
Lacey Raye
1
Lacey Raye

Forcing/coercing people to consume vaccines is against the Nuremberg Code. We are sovereign citizens; our bodies are quintessential private property.

Reply
Jacklynn Bosley
1
Jacklynn Bosley

My son is vaccine injured. He can not process and detox vaccines properly. It caused him to suffer from vaccine induced brain damage otherwise medically diagnosed as severe autism. He is non verbal.

Reply
Sim 83
Sim 83

Our hearts go out to you our son soon to be 7 years old is verbal but has most of the red flags of Autism, SPD, he may have been given the oral polio vaccine after being born without our knowledge.

Erin Cole
1
Erin Cole

Where there is risk involved there must be choice. Period.

Reply
Amelia Rodriguez-Caldera
0
Amelia Rodriguez-Caldera

The government has NO business mandating anything on myself or my children. Where there is RISK there must be CHOICE

Reply
Alison Derum
0
Alison Derum

Forcing an untested liability free product brought to us by the makers of Vioxx?? NO THANKS

Reply
Breeauna Sagdal
0
Breeauna Sagdal

Mandatory vaccination violates the Nuremburg code, AND the constitution! We when we no longer have bodily autonomy we're nothing more than slaves! My body MY CHOICE!

Reply
Sim 83
0
Sim 83

Our bodies our children our choice, Herd Immunity Means Strong Natural Immunity not man enhanced compromised immunity!

Reply
Crystal Townsend
0
Crystal Townsend

Because it goes against our rights and even if we NEED a medical exemption it's almost impossible to get one especially for those of us on government insurance.

Reply
Stockmaster Karis
0
Stockmaster Karis

This is NOT about vaccines, this is about FREEDOM of CHOICE! There is not a single medical procedure that should be FORCED on anyone. The government may NOT tell me what to put in my body!

Reply
John Fredrick
0
John Fredrick

Because I am not a communist psychopath.

Reply
Ashlee Novak Snyder
0
Ashlee Novak Snyder

https://www.facebook.com/669084493234593/posts/1332850513524651?sfns=mo

Reply
Debbie Middleton
0
Debbie Middleton

Hell no! Feds have no right to a personal choice! You open this can if worms it will spiral. What's next?

Reply
Brittani Plumlee
0
Brittani Plumlee

Body autonomy is not a joke.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Look and the ingrediants and use alternative medicine with it

Reply
Ka San
0
Ka San

We have already weighed in on this issue in a previous poll. Kids whose parents choose not to vaccinate them shoud not be allowed to attend school and put other kids at risk.

Reply
Ka San
Ka San

I responded in the wrong column. The govt should definitely remove most exemptions to vaccinations. Kids whose parents don't vaccinate, should not be allowed to attend school and risk other kids.

Sim 83
Sim 83

You are so misguided it's sad you and your kind have been vaccinated against the truth, you will all suffer for your lack of awareness. Educate Yourself Before It's Too Late! http://tinyurl.com/zszmw5

Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

No, no, no! Always trying to find a way to get their nose in the tent. Are you naive enough to believe it would stop there?!!

Reply
Would you support a tax on Zyn to fund wildfire fighting and prevention?

Would you support a tax on Zyn to fund wildfire fighting and prevention?

YES

1

NO

0

YES

1 Comment
Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

We should all be in favor of anything that creates a safer community for all of us, regardless of political affiliation. Since our federal funds have been decreased, we need another form of revenue to supplement our fire fighting revenue.

Reply

NO

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Would you like to see the sale of public lands to help with the federal budget deficit?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
164 Votes

Would you like to see the sale of public lands to help with the federal budget deficit?

YES

1

NO

11

YES

1 Comment
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Yes, and do some more logging and cleaning the forest

Reply
Oakley Taylor
Oakley Taylor

Do you not value trees and animals? Do you understand how precious the forest is for all of us? This is not a partisan issue. It's a matter of how we value life of all kinds, animal and humans alike. Please think about your words before speaking.

Bendlover
Bendlover

Just one intelligent reply from you is all I ask...

NO

5 Comments
k san
0
k san

The federal budget deficit would be EASILY diminished if the Rs in Congress would vote to make the tax system fairer by making the top richest pay their fair share. But they won't. They'd rather take from the poor+ middle class and sale public lands vs. doing the obvious and fairest remedy!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
0
Karen Thrower

It is a shameful idea. These lands belong to all of us, and are not for sale.

Reply
Oakley Taylor
Oakley Taylor

True dat.

Scott Taylor
0
Scott Taylor

Hey, If Mike Lee wants to sell Utah's public lands, see how his constituents like it with theirs. Stay away from Oregon and the other states who don't like it. If Trump wants his big ugly bill to pass, reimburse the government for what the taxpayers pay for his golfing at his resorts + his parade.

Reply
Oakley Taylor
Oakley Taylor

Yay to you!

Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

This would be a crime and one that is irreversible. If Trump needed the money so bad, maybe he shouldn’t have spent our hard-earned tax money on his birthday parade. I am a public land owner and I oppose this proposition. How dare Mike Lee try pulling off this crap on us. We’re not stupid.

Reply
Carol Yetter
0
Carol Yetter

Public lands are our heritage due to the foresight of great individuals. Only those interested in profiteering propose and support the rape of Oregon and public properties.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT