KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should Oregon revisit its public indecency laws?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
677 Votes

Should Oregon revisit its public indecency laws?

Yes

5

No

10

Yes

5 Comments
Latterdaysaint
1
Latterdaysaint

Arouse or not they should be arrested for public indecency

Reply
sandra zollman
0
sandra zollman

Decency is important. Morals are important. Public nudity should never be allowed. It serves no benefits to society,

Reply
m
0
m

How dare poeple not give a damn about kids. When I was a kid you would get cited or arrested for indecent exposure. Enough with this lunacy way of thinking, other people besides naked people have rights too you all.

Reply
John Hardy
0
John Hardy

I support self expression, but public nudity could create opportunities for perverts to harm others. I am especially concerned about children walking around nude with strangers nearby.

Reply

No

9 Comments
Kathi McDonald
1
Kathi McDonald

The word indecent is self explanatory! It's there for a reason and no one wants to see other peoples private parts! Keep it behind closed doors in your PRIVATE HOMES!

Reply
steven
steven

Did you understand the question?

Ralph Sutich
0
Ralph Sutich

Because You Should Be Able To Walk Naked In Public

Reply
stephen patterson
0
stephen patterson

Why should we be ashamed of being created in God's image

Reply
steven hicks
0
steven hicks

we were born without clothes as long as the person that is naked is not acting in a sexual way or being obscene about it then is should not be criminalized. It is an expression of one's self and should be protected under 1A

Reply
John Moore
0
John Moore

As long as they are not engaging in immoral activities then they should be able to wear what they want, even if they don't want to wear anything. I do believe that even a first time event of anything sexual in public should involve a serious sentence. Rights shouldn't be revoked because of feelings

Reply
Melissa Howiler
0
Melissa Howiler

All over some nekid lady cmon GET REAL

Reply
Tim Tengesdal
0
Tim Tengesdal

Very few people look better without clothes, and I don't want to see it. However, based on history and human behavior, there is no better way to make it popular than to make it illegal. Alcohol prohibition and banning assault rifles are good examples.

Reply
Gayle Stamler
0
Gayle Stamler

As usual, people who most vocally proclaim their own freedoms are the first to object to freedom for others.

Reply
Don L
0
Don L

I can do what I want on my property without repercussion

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
375 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

15

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

15 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Jim Terry
0
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply
Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT