KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Do you think $3-5 is a fair price for wilderness access fees?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
559 Votes

Do you think $3-5 is a fair price for wilderness access fees?

Yes

7

No

12

Yes

7 Comments
M Davis
1
M Davis

Pay to play. Our forests are being loved to death and we need a plan, oversight and enforcement if the forest is going to continue to be enjoyed by everyone.

Reply
John Driscoll
0
John Driscoll

Nothing is free. If anything, the fee is too low.

Reply
Ben Wiborg
0
Ben Wiborg

As long as it’s used to maintain trails and others wilderness areas as needed.

Reply
Mou Chat Reed
0
Mou Chat Reed

And double for out of state folk.

Reply
Stephanie Finch
0
Stephanie Finch

It’s awful to see the deterioration of these areas due to overuse and irresponsible people- maybe a fee would deter some of the lazier ones? Would absolutely support a local discount though too...

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

I would have said no, if people weren't leaving all their trash in the woods. I'm getting tired of cleaning up after others! Now they can pay a fee to use what should be free.

Reply
Roger Mathus
0
Roger Mathus

Fees are needed and should be used for trail maintenance and for education on protection of the wilderness areas. How people trash out the wilderness areas and make new paths is irresponsible.

Reply

No

12 Comments
kel arn
0
kel arn

We all own this land,government fleecing of america. No more taxes to enjoy land. Remove all fee sites.

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Just another tax that will do nothing Forest Service is just another Government Entity that is full of Fraud Waste and Abuse

Reply
Judy Ostrom-Dixon
0
Judy Ostrom-Dixon

We already pay taxes for this....stop already!!!

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

Our taxes pay for et al in the forest costs......always has. Just has to do with waste and mismanagement by the USFS and their addiction for more.....more......more...! Haven't paid and never will!

Reply
Karen M Newcomb
0
Karen M Newcomb

I voted no because the public owns the land. I remember a time when I wanted to show my children a special public site, and the fee was too high. I probably won't make use of the trails.

Reply
Patricia Brady-McKinney
0
Patricia Brady-McKinney

We own this land and should not have to pay a fee to use it. How about we quit promoting this place (Visit Bend) so that fewer people come and abuse the land.

Reply
Lucin McGarry
0
Lucin McGarry

Absolutely not, people wonder why very little are spending time outdoors anymore. This is why! Almost every outdoor activity or place to enjoy nature has a price tag on it. What happened to Gods gift?

Reply
Raymond Meskill
0
Raymond Meskill

It belongs to the people

Reply
NotENuf Tea
0
NotENuf Tea

access to public lands should not be charged for. permitted if necessary but no charge to access or go in and camp in undeveloped sites.

Reply
Brad Cheney
0
Brad Cheney

They dont use the money they already get wisely,paying a fee wont make people clean up after themselves and we all know the forest service wont be out there cleaning up peoples left behinds.

Reply
Paul Gauthier
0
Paul Gauthier

These fees will make it very difficult for groups, such as meetups and hiking groups, to make reservations for group hikes in advance. They cannot collect the fees until the day of the hike.

Reply
Heidi Owen
0
Heidi Owen

We should not have to pay for our own land use. It's getting out of hand.

Reply
Would you support a tax on Zyn to fund wildfire fighting and prevention?

Would you support a tax on Zyn to fund wildfire fighting and prevention?

YES

1

NO

0

YES

1 Comment
Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

We should all be in favor of anything that creates a safer community for all of us, regardless of political affiliation. Since our federal funds have been decreased, we need another form of revenue to supplement our fire fighting revenue.

Reply

NO

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Would you like to see the sale of public lands to help with the federal budget deficit?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
164 Votes

Would you like to see the sale of public lands to help with the federal budget deficit?

YES

1

NO

11

YES

1 Comment
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Yes, and do some more logging and cleaning the forest

Reply
Oakley Taylor
Oakley Taylor

Do you not value trees and animals? Do you understand how precious the forest is for all of us? This is not a partisan issue. It's a matter of how we value life of all kinds, animal and humans alike. Please think about your words before speaking.

Bendlover
Bendlover

Just one intelligent reply from you is all I ask...

NO

5 Comments
k san
0
k san

The federal budget deficit would be EASILY diminished if the Rs in Congress would vote to make the tax system fairer by making the top richest pay their fair share. But they won't. They'd rather take from the poor+ middle class and sale public lands vs. doing the obvious and fairest remedy!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
0
Karen Thrower

It is a shameful idea. These lands belong to all of us, and are not for sale.

Reply
Oakley Taylor
Oakley Taylor

True dat.

Scott Taylor
0
Scott Taylor

Hey, If Mike Lee wants to sell Utah's public lands, see how his constituents like it with theirs. Stay away from Oregon and the other states who don't like it. If Trump wants his big ugly bill to pass, reimburse the government for what the taxpayers pay for his golfing at his resorts + his parade.

Reply
Oakley Taylor
Oakley Taylor

Yay to you!

Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

This would be a crime and one that is irreversible. If Trump needed the money so bad, maybe he shouldn’t have spent our hard-earned tax money on his birthday parade. I am a public land owner and I oppose this proposition. How dare Mike Lee try pulling off this crap on us. We’re not stupid.

Reply
Carol Yetter
0
Carol Yetter

Public lands are our heritage due to the foresight of great individuals. Only those interested in profiteering propose and support the rape of Oregon and public properties.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT