Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
What team nickname do you prefer: Huskers or Cornhuskers?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
5/31/2018

What team nickname do you prefer: Huskers or Cornhuskers?

33%
Huskers

10

67%
Cornhuskers WINNER

39

33%
Huskers

10 Comments
Brian Michael Thomas Snodgrass
5
Brian Michael Thomas Snodgrass

As an alum, I don't care either way.

Reply
Joe Dreyer
Joe Dreyer

Good man

Jason Stephens
3
Jason Stephens

Cornhusker reinforces the "Nebraska is nothing but cornfields & farmers" stereotype. Huskers isn't my favorite but it is like Buckeyes in that when it's said, nuts isn't actually what comes to mind

Reply
Alan Sexton
2
Alan Sexton

I prefer national champions.....

Reply
Mick Hanson
2
Mick Hanson

To be honest, it's what I use, but we are both, no need to pick one. Maybe for the spring game, if both sides are fair. one can be the Cornhuskers, and the other Huskers, winner gets the nickname for the season.

Reply
Joe Dreyer
Joe Dreyer

cool and fun idea. promote this

ScubaJP
1
ScubaJP

simple, rolls off the tongue easy

Reply
Mike Cockson
0
Mike Cockson

It just sounds classier

Reply
Ronald Sondergaard
0
Ronald Sondergaard

cornhuskers sounds like a farmers login

Reply
John Lind
0
John Lind

i just like the sound of it

Reply

67%
Cornhuskers

35 Comments
Norman Curfman
4
Norman Curfman

It seems more traditional and like the name better.

Reply
Loren Zimmerman
Loren Zimmerman

Corn is what made us unique, and famous. Even today, media uses Cornhuskers as a milestone to beat.

Eric Swanson
3
Eric Swanson

I prefer Bug Eaters !

Reply
John Kretzschmar
2
John Kretzschmar

Because I was unable to choose BUG EATERS

Reply
Roger Lohr
2
Roger Lohr

Nebraska Cornhuskers are who we are.

Reply
Joe Dreyer
1
Joe Dreyer

I like what coach Frost said. We are not ashamed of where or who we are. We are Nebraska in the middle of cornfields. We are the Nebraska Cornhuskers. But Huskers can be uses sometimes.

Reply
Richard Conroy
1
Richard Conroy

No need to be ashamed of being a rural/farming/ranching state. Own it!

Reply
Valerie Gilmore
1
Valerie Gilmore

like the name as is, Cornhuskers, and want the uniform to stay the same too!

Reply
David McClymont
1
David McClymont

Worked out great for a long time. Why change?

Reply
Johnny Joyce
1
Johnny Joyce

Original all the way. We are Nebraska.

Reply
David Weaver
1
David Weaver

I'm fine with either - call us the Bug Eaters, doesn't matter, just WIN.

Reply
Phil Wojtalewicz
1
Phil Wojtalewicz

If preceeded by "Nebraska", then "Cornhuskers" is appropriate. Keith Jackson calling a game where he always used "Cornhuskers" is legendary.

Reply
Sterling Miller
1
Sterling Miller

Love this name. It's unique in the world of college football. Huskers is okay every once in a while, but I truly dislike how it has become the "official" name. NU needs to change it's branding!

Reply
Joe Dreyer
Joe Dreyer

like when they tried to replace Herbie with that stupid blow up doll baby

Charley Olson
1
Charley Olson

You can always shorten it but nobody knows what a Husker is.....ultimately.

Reply
Kim R. Fandry
1
Kim R. Fandry

It will always be the Cornhuskers. Huskers is Media version so they do not have to type it out....lol

Reply
Scott RideOn
1
Scott RideOn

It is what it is. Husking corn was long, hard and tedious work. It yielded survival of those who feed us.

Reply
Shad Olson
0
Shad Olson

The original. The proud fullness of the state's number one product. The Nebraska Cornhuskers, it should always be.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

We were always the cornhuskers. We were the dominant college team for the last half century... as the cornhuskers. We are huskers only because because we husk the corn.

Reply
Jeff Ketzler
0
Jeff Ketzler

I am a little tired of everyone shortening names. If it is Rosenblatt, it isn't the Blatt. I could go on, but it is and always will be the Cornhuskers.

Reply
Linda Holloway Dike
0
Linda Holloway Dike

It really depends on what it is on(hats,shirts,car plates etc)

Reply
Bradley Scott Wulfekuhl
0
Bradley Scott Wulfekuhl

Because that is who we are. A life time Corn Boy

Reply
Jerry Williams
0
Jerry Williams

It does not make a big difference to me. But being old I did get use to "Cornhuskers." Plus I actually used a glove and hook to husk corn.

Reply
Dirk Schlicht
0
Dirk Schlicht

This was a change by "Dollar Bill" Remember that A.D.? We are CORNhuskers! Say it loud and proud.

Reply
Dan Cubrich
0
Dan Cubrich

That stinking Callahan is the puke who changed it to the Huskers. It SHOULD BE the Cornhuskers.

Reply
Michael Vlach
0
Michael Vlach

Love the tradition of "Cornhuskers." Tradition.

Reply
Randy Gentry
0
Randy Gentry

That's the name. It was BugEaters then came NEBRASKA CORNHUSKERS!

Reply
Todd Titus
0
Todd Titus

Have been and always will be... CORNHUSKERS !!!!!

Reply
Tim Freed Sr.
0
Tim Freed Sr.

Cornhuskers has a charm to it that transcends college football history. It evokes vivid memories of players on the field throughout the decades. Close your eyes and remember.

Reply
Danny Baker
0
Danny Baker

Really, it does not matter to me, but for an official name, stay with tradition.

Reply
Arlyn Trauernicht
0
Arlyn Trauernicht

this is what it should have been all the time.

Reply
Arlie Rauch
0
Arlie Rauch

What's a Husker if it isn't corn? And I don't see any lawsuits in the near future!

Reply
Mike Bryant
0
Mike Bryant

That's who we are....THE CORNHUSKERS OF NEBRASKA.

Reply
Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Exciting change for better

8

Skeptical of sudden shift

3

Exciting change for better

7 Comments
Don Buckingham
0
Don Buckingham

Glad to see an acknowledgement that the O wasn't working. This shows some urgency about winning which I appreciate.

Reply
Bill Greim
0
Bill Greim

Seems pretty obvious that when something is not working very well and you don’t know how to fix it you bring in outside experts for advise. Common practice.

Reply
Brad Bredenkamp
0
Brad Bredenkamp

Holgerson has enough experience that he should be able to watch some film and the players in practice and call plays that play to their strengths. I'm betting he is also smart enough to stick with what's working until the other team stops it, and to develop some offensive rhythm.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

Anything is better than Satterfield. But I don't know why we didn't go after the US Army's OC who only makes $190k and absolutely knows how to run the ball.

Reply
Brad Bredenkamp
Brad Bredenkamp

Because Army's OC can call the triple option and run the ball, but he probably doesn't know how to call for a pro-style quarterback. Plus it is very unlikely that Army's OC is going to jump ship right now the way their season is going. Maybe gets a look after the season if Holgerson doesn't stay.

Dick Plock
0
Dick Plock

Needed change for quite a many games. Our offensive & defense coordinators are being out smarted.

Reply
Jean McGee
0
Jean McGee

Satt has been wasting Raiola’s passing strength.

Reply

Skeptical of sudden shift

3 Comments
VAHuskerFan
1
VAHuskerFan

I refuse to get my hopes up

Reply
Craig S
1
Craig S

Installing a whole new offense would be very difficult. You might be able to refine a small portion but learning the timing and terminology would be difficult.

Reply
michael daly
0
michael daly

The habits of almost 2 years don't change overnight. That being said, A new , more forceful, high expectation coach, might be able to snap them awake and Go

Reply
Will Nebraska make a bowl game this season?

Will Nebraska make a bowl game this season?

Yes, they have the games.

2

It's going to be tough.

11

Yes, they have the games.

2 Comments
Visitor
0
Visitor

Got to keep the faith

Reply
James Key
0
James Key

Majic 8 Ball says yes!!!

Reply

It's going to be tough.

11 Comments
Miller3l
1
Miller3l

I doubt that this late in the season this change will help. I hope it does but i have no faith left. The O-line is just horrible.

Reply
Sporty361
0
Sporty361

Good thing we played buffs early. They have improved throughout the season and have been rated most of year. They are moving forward while we are retreating.

Reply
Randy Weitzenkamp
0
Randy Weitzenkamp

My heart says yes, but my head says no. Are they capable? Absolutely, but we haven't seen enough consistency in any of the 3 phases of the game to warrant any confidence that we can win one of the last three games.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

Why don't we recruit the Army's offensive coordinator who really know how to develop a running game? And he only makes $190,000 per year.

Reply
Joe Hegarty
0
Joe Hegarty

Won't be favored in any remaining games.

Reply
John Lienemann
0
John Lienemann

They have to fight for it. I will be honest and say it depends on which NU team shows up and that’s why I think it’s going to be tough. They could either win the last 3 games but they could also lose the last 3 games.

Reply
Lyle Martin
0
Lyle Martin

Looking like they won't win again this year

Reply
Bill Scheef
0
Bill Scheef

Nope...hate to say it but we need a dual threat at QB. It was worth the try, but DR is better off served playing for a program that best suits his drop back talent and at this point in time it's not here. We will drop all three and maybe giving Lincoln Riley two weeks to plan...it's not good !

Reply
The ANTI Trump
0
The ANTI Trump

offense is more confusion and chaos instead of concern and control

Reply
Roger Moellendorf
0
Roger Moellendorf

Sadly, no, I don't think it will happen. There are just too many problems with every aspect of their game. Especially offense and special teams.

Reply
Bill Petty
0
Bill Petty

I am not hopeful that this team will win another game this year. Just about every phase of the game is sub par. We have clearly regressed as the season has unfolded. Don't forget how much Jeff Simms was hyped last year; how did that turn out. I don't have confidence in the coaching staff.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT