ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?

Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?

Yes

8

No

1

Yes

Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?
7 Comments
Peter Wexler
3
Peter Wexler

1) There is no legal recourse if something goes wrong. 2) These dangerous gene therapies have never been tried before. 3) The chief executive does not make laws. 4) Something needs to happen to Joe Biden.

Reply
Max
3
Max

Biden has no authority to do this, and he will soon find that out.

Reply
Larry Sabulsky
2
Larry Sabulsky

Mandates need to go away. Freedom needs to return.

Reply
Paul Hamby
2
Paul Hamby

not the role of the federal government. the mandate is unconstitutional and that is the question the high court should be answering

Reply
Fredrick Green
2
Fredrick Green

It's not the government's job to tell someone to get a vaccination. While I promote getting the vaccine it is up to the person to make their decision on receiving the vaccine.

Reply
Jacob G
1
Jacob G

It is now known public info that the vaccines do not prevent the vaccinated from spreading COVID19. Therefore the mandate, targeting only the unvaxxed for weekly testing does not stop the vaccinated from workplace spread.

Reply
Lisa Gore
1
Lisa Gore

It is illegal for the government to claim they are smarter than every citizen in the US for making our own sound intelligent medical decisions like they have a conservatorship over us. It’s called Parens Patrae, also the Brandon-admin lawyer said the unvaxed are a threat to vaxed=vaxes dont work🇺🇸

Reply

No

Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?
1 Comment
Sue Evans
0
Sue Evans

Employers are expected to provide a safe working environment. Employers providing health insurance benefit will have tor raise premiums or stop offering all together.

Reply
Max
Max

Forcing a person to inject a foreign substance into their body, is not providing a safe work environment for that person, or for anyone else. It is also unconstitutional.

Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?

Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?

Yes

4

No

3

Yes

2 Comments
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

Defund all welfare programs. Make people responsible for their own actions.

Reply
Max
0
Max

SNAP is primarily funded by the U.S. federal government through congressional appropriations, with the USDA providing the funds, and states administering the program and covering their share of administrative costs.

Reply
Max
Max

Trump won this. SCOTUS ruled in favor of Trump.

No

3 Comments
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

Trump basically has no say in this, it's on the shoulders of Congress. Might want to study what all the 111th Congress did back in 2009-11... this is all about payback.

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
0
Zaos Gonzolez

Spend the money on something else. Send missiles to israel instead.

Reply
Toasty
0
Toasty

Its all a game both sides are playing with real people in the middle. Trump should step aside and tell congress this mess is all theirs.

Reply
Max
Max

Schumer knows this is all on the backs of the democrats.

Did you watch any of this year's World Series?

Did you watch any of this year's World Series?

Yes

1

No

2

Yes

1 Comment
Larry Ewart
0
Larry Ewart

I did but only the last two games. Which as it turned out to be the best.

Reply

No

2 Comments
Toasty
2
Toasty

There was a world series?

Reply
Fat Guy Outdoors
0
Fat Guy Outdoors

I haven't watched a baseball game since the late 80's. Just not my thing.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT