ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Should the definition of fully vaccinated be changed?
ABC 17 News Asked by ABC 17 News
279 Votes

Should the definition of fully vaccinated be changed?

Yes

0

No

2

Yes

Should the definition of fully vaccinated be changed?
Many medical experts are pushing for the definition to include a booster shot after omicron has shown an ability to evade protection.
Many medical experts are pushing for the definition to include a booster shot after omicron has shown an ability to evade protection. Show Less
0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

Should the definition of fully vaccinated be changed?
So far the definition remains two shots of Moderna or Pfizer and a shot on Johnson & Johnson.
So far the definition remains two shots of Moderna or Pfizer and a shot on Johnson & Johnson. Show Less
2 Comments
Max
1
Max

Why is it called a vaccine? A real vaccine protects you from the disease. This stuff only lessons the effects of the disease, and that is questionable. The CDC is unreliable and Fauci is less than unreliable. Fauce lies every time he opens his mouth.

Reply
David Wiley
0
David Wiley

If this keeps up everyone will be getting boosters until they are old and dead. You ONLY get one shot for the Flu and considered vaccinated so if you got the two shots from Pfizer/Moderna or the Single from J&J you should be considered FULLY Vaccinated too.

Reply
Are you paying attention to the NFL playoffs despite the Chiefs' absence?
ABC 17 News Asked by ABC 17 News
1 Vote

Are you paying attention to the NFL playoffs despite the Chiefs' absence?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Whose Missouri income tax plan is better?
ABC 17 News Asked by ABC 17 News
411 Votes

Whose Missouri income tax plan is better?

Democrats

6

Republicans

4

Democrats

Democrats want to lower taxes for low-income people and increase taxes on the rich.
Democrats want to lower taxes for low-income people and increase taxes on the rich. Show Less
1 Comments
Fred
0
Fred

Not since the Great Depression has wealth inequality in the US been so acute, Top 0.1% now worth as much as the bottom 90%. Prior to Reagan and trickle-down economics in the mid-80's, the bottom 90% held over 35% and the top 0.1% about 10%. And yet, the wealthiest among us still want more!

Reply
Max
Max

It will always be that way, because most people make bad choices.

Fred
Fred

Forgot one important fact ... Reagan and trickle-down economics also put us on the path to huge budget deficits and financial ruin.

Fred
Fred

This data is from 12 years ago, but it is only WORSE now. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/13/us-wealth-inequality-top-01-worth-as-much-as-the-bottom-90

Republicans

GOP governor Mike Kehoe has proposed phasing out state income tax.
GOP governor Mike Kehoe has proposed phasing out state income tax. Show Less
3 Comments
Steve Baumann
1
Steve Baumann

Nothing the Democrats have done of offered has ever helped the majority of the people. Obamacare caused my healthcare to skyrocket and quality to plummet. Democratic scandals, such as those seen in Minnesota with the Somalians, far too common. It's past time to support out President.

Reply
Fred
Fred

Prior to the Affordable Care Act, insurance companies routinely denied coverage for pre-existing conditions. How exactly does that reduce the quality of coverage?

Fred
Fred

Right ... other than the 19th Amendment, Social Security, GI Bill, Medicare, Medicaid, Securities and Exchange Act, Rural Electrification Act, unemployment benefits, Voting Rights Act, Head Start & student loans, Republicans? Tax cuts for corporations & the wealthy.

JIC CoMo
0
JIC CoMo

I say fire every Politian. I have not seen one yet that knows what they are doing. They are only for themself and not for the people of the State.

Reply
Toasty
0
Toasty

If the revenue isn't replaced (along with cuts) with a flat/consumption/fair tax, then it's a waste of time. When it comes to spending money, republicans can waste it as much as the democrats.

Reply
Fred
Fred

It would probably be replaced by higher regressive sales tax rates.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT