ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Does Missouri need a "red flag" law on guns?

Does Missouri need a "red flag" law on guns?

Yes

6

No

11

Yes

Does Missouri need a "red flag" law on guns?
2 Comments
Adam
2
Adam

Repeal the 2nd ammendment. The US has the 2nd highest gun death total in the world. Ban ALL semi and fully automatic weapons. Nobody needs them. Minimum age should be 28. Have 1 pistol and 1 gun for hunting. More guns = more deaths and more violence.

Reply
Mary Ann Pulley
Mary Ann Pulley

I agree sir who needs more than one gun and one rifle for hunting?

Christopher Watson
Christopher Watson

You do realize that if you file down the firing pin a certain amount, that you can turn any semi automatic weapon into an automatic? You can repel the 2nd Admin., but you will never get rid of guns in this country. Besides, you can buy one in any City for pennies on the dollar, any day of the year.

Max
Max

Fortunately, I don't have your intelligence. ROTFLOL.

Adam
Adam

Switzerland, UK, Australia, and Canada have enacted gun reforms of some sort. Since then, the firearm death rate in the US was 4 times higher than Switzerland, 5 times higher than Canada, 10 times higher than Australia, and 35 times higher than the UK.

Adam
Adam

Ok ok...Wikipedia. The trusted internet source. Highest gun related deaths in high income countries. The US is by far the highest rated https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

Adam
Adam

Wikipedia? That's your source??? Lol https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-deaths-by-country

Max
Max

Check Wikipedia, actually we are 16th, but you have never been correct or honest before.

Bonnie Sandker
1
Bonnie Sandker

If you know someone has guns and is making threats on social media etc., then they should have their weapons taken away for the safety of everyone.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Would this apply to other items that could be used as a weapon, like cars, knives, axes, poison, or matches?

No

Does Missouri need a "red flag" law on guns?
5 Comments
Brooklyn Nicole
5
Brooklyn Nicole

No, because then anyone could lie and make up a reason to get someone's guns taken away from them.

Reply
Max
4
Max

Although the Constitution of the United States does not cite it explicitly, presumption of innocence is widely held to follow from the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments.

Reply
Max DeYoung
2
Max DeYoung

This violates the Constitution.

Reply
Christopher Watson
1
Christopher Watson

Because you can buy a gun in just about any city for pennies on the dollar if you know where to look. No matter what law you pass, guns for evil will always be available. That is the only "Red Flag" that will always exist.

Reply
Should the U.S. military step up operations in Venezuela or pull back?

Should the U.S. military step up operations in Venezuela or pull back?

Step it up

3

We should stop

1

Step it up

2 Comments
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

What the do on their soil, is their business, but once their drugs are out on boats in the big beautiful Gulf of America, blow them out of the water.

Reply
Max
0
Max

We have plenty of drugs as it is.

Reply

We should stop

1 Comment
Toasty
0
Toasty

We're not the world's police and we executed those people in cold blood. If Venezuela wants to kill its citizens without proof and without a trial, then leave the US out of it.

Reply
Max
Max

Venezuela is helping the companies that make Narcan.

What do you think of demolishing part of the White House to build a ballroom?

What do you think of demolishing part of the White House to build a ballroom?

It doesn't bother me

4

I don't like it

4

It doesn't bother me

4 Comments
Carol Backe
0
Carol Backe

I think if it were Obama, nothing would be said about it. I think just because it’s President Trump there is the hate that some have for him. Not this much controversy when all the other changes were done by other presidents. None of this is costing taxpayers as it has in the past.

Reply
Fred
Fred

Please provide an example of such an expansive change ... this ballroom is likely to turn out to be larger than the White House itself! I don't doubt we'll see a TRUMP sign on it before it is finished!

Max
0
Max

Trump is improving the White House, and he is using private funding to do that.

Reply
Fred
Fred

Right ... "private funding" in exchange for pardons and other favors. The more accurate description is BRIBES.

Kenneth Young
0
Kenneth Young

Separation of the rich and poor is getting wider. I was never invited to watch a movie in the movie room just like I'll never be invited to any dances.....I think we'd be better off if they tore down the west wing

Reply
Eric Smith
0
Eric Smith

Big Beautiful White House

Reply

I don't like it

2 Comments
Chris Macy
1
Chris Macy

STOP THIS MANIAC!!!

Reply
Kelly Branstetter
1
Kelly Branstetter

It's history, it's respect and honor, the ballroom was never approved and the drawings show it overshadowing the White House itself. Awful

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT