ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Do you support more gun regulations?

Do you support more gun regulations?

Yes

12

No

38

Yes

Do you support more gun regulations?
12 Comments
Bill Glover
1
Bill Glover

Gun worship is about human sacrifice on the altar of power and profit. Anyone who tells you anything different is selling something.

Reply
BB
1
BB

Supporters of ownership of any gun imaginable always leave out of their constitution arguments the part about "well-regulated". They also, forget the militia part. It seems clear that our forefathers had in mind that citizens would act as a militia before we had a National Guard.

Reply
Stuart Singer
1
Stuart Singer

In no other western industrialized country in the world is there such a disgraceful absence of firearms control that is responsible for so much killing as there is in the United States. Even the Heller decision by the SCOTUS approved of government controls.

Reply
Hi Snowpack
1
Hi Snowpack

There is nothing about 99.9 percent of the gun nuts in this country that could possibly be defined as a "a well regulated Militia". The gun situation in this country is the exact opposite.

Reply
Adam Schrader
1
Adam Schrader

Anyone should be allowed the right to own a firearm. 1 pistol type and 1 rifle type. Nothing semi automatic or fully automatic. Nobody needs those weapons. Not for hunting or protection.

Reply
JoeyMac
JoeyMac

What about the sniper types, and the shotgun types, and the crew-served type, and the drive-by type, and the explodey type, and the armor piercing type? Why do you discriminate against so many gun types? Why are you such a hoplophobe?

Adam Schrader
Adam Schrader

Every other type of firearm other than pistol, rifle. And shot guns are logical fir protection and hunting. No other gun type is meant for this. They need to ban every type of assault weapon and ammunition for them. Enough innocent people are getting killed

Kay Fay
1
Kay Fay

Guns are weapons. They're too easily gotten by people who shouldn't have guns. There's no reason for many of the semi automatic and automatic weapons being sold except for to kill multiple people. No need and high risk. Let's know who are buying guns in mass. The do do to pass them onto criminals.

Reply
Harry D
Harry D

Transfering guns to criminals is already illegal. Unauthorized people even trying to buy guns is illegal, Trump inforced this law, past Dem admins have not. Most shootings in this country are black on black, Dems are OK with this since it keeps blacks down and on the Dem plantation.

Co Lin
0
Co Lin

Because people are not as mature and responsible as weapons require. They kjust aren't. We have to regulate the use of motor vehicles, too. Grow up, yahoos.

Reply
Rick Brunson
0
Rick Brunson

Assault weapon civilian related crimes have become a pandemic.

Reply
Gail Beebe
0
Gail Beebe

I don't think a reasonable person needs to own a military weapon. I can understand the person who wants a handgun or rifle. The NRA encourages people to collect guns. The NRA should be held accountable for the bullshit they spread.

Reply
John Nickerson
0
John Nickerson

Our society doesn't benefit from citizens with assault weapons and there are people that have demonstrated they shouldn't be in possession of any type of gun, certainly not weapons of war.

Reply

No

Do you support more gun regulations?
38 Comments
Anthony Rinaldi
6
Anthony Rinaldi

Gun control is misogynist, racist, and classist. I will never support such evil legislation.

Reply
Scuba Steve
5
Scuba Steve

2.5 MILLION defensive uses annually vs. <400 deaths from ALL types of rifles. That's fewer than those killed by hands & feet. Ask yourself who benefits from making citizens powerless in a nation with increasing authoritarian control, militarized police, and NSA surveillance. And who owns the media.

Reply
Michael Leninsky
5
Michael Leninsky

The gun regulations do not work. They attack the law abiding citizen. They need to concentrate on the criminals that use them in a violent nature and not the ones using to protect themselves. Or hunt for their food.

Reply
Steve TheBmann
5
Steve TheBmann

There are already plenty of laws in place. Criminals don't obey laws. Guns are not the problem.

Reply
JoeyMac
4
JoeyMac

Guns are already one of THE most regulated items in America. It's impossible to commit a crime with a gun without breaking several existing laws in the process... will 1 or 2 more laws stand in the way of gun crime when tens of thousands of gun laws did not? Just enforce the laws we already have.

Reply
Rick Lanicek
4
Rick Lanicek

We don't need more gun laws. We need stiffer penalties for committing a crime with a gun. Might as well ban spoons to combat obesity and the health care crisis.

Reply
phil hopkins
4
phil hopkins

Dem run cities are a health hazard see top 20 most violent USA cities are democrat led and until defund the police and no bail laws are gone they are getting worse.

Reply
Joe McGinnis
4
Joe McGinnis

The government is taking away our rights one by one. The 2nd amendment SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON.

Reply
Janet Cierpiot Lampe
4
Janet Cierpiot Lampe

No Criminals will still have guns

Reply
Chris Bond
3
Chris Bond

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Reply
Michael Pietrzak
3
Michael Pietrzak

Shall not be infringed

Reply
The #ForeverTrumper Mad Embalmer πŸ’ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
3
The #ForeverTrumper Mad Embalmer πŸ’ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

The constitutional right to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT be infringed.

Reply
Sandra White
3
Sandra White

As a responsible gun owner, I think the real problem is not with regulating who can own them. If I can defend myself and my family, I stand less of a chance of becoming a statistic. Open carry is a great way to deter crime.

Reply
Edgar Alain Flotte
3
Edgar Alain Flotte

Murder is illegal, criminals do not follow the law. This will put law abiding citizens in disadvantage. Guns will be still be able to be made illegally to commit illegal crimes

Reply
James Frantz
3
James Frantz

Law abiding citizens aren't the issue and neither are the guns. The problem continues to be criminals committing heinous acts of violence with indiscriminate abandon.

Reply
Jack Atherton
3
Jack Atherton

Because I believe in the US Constitution.

Reply
Ben Burckhartt
3
Ben Burckhartt

The 2nd amendment wasn't given to keep the people regulated but to regulate the Gov't over the people. I'd vote yes to regulate our Govt's weapons and our military empire

Reply
James Blount
2
James Blount

Additional regulations do nothing to stop criminals, obviously a person planning on robbing and murdering someone is not going to be concerned if the weapon he uses is illegal. It only disarms law abiding citizens leaving them vulnerable to criminals who disregard these ineffective laws.

Reply
Buckeye
2
Buckeye

It would be just the beginning

Reply
Thomas S
2
Thomas S

The Feds don't enforce the laws we already have, why would we want more do nothing, feel good laws? None of his proposals would have prevented any of the recent mass shootings. By definition criminals don't care if it's against the law, think somebody about to commit murder cares about Joe's rules?

Reply
73_ Easting
2
73_ Easting

Most proposals punish the wrong people. Assault weapons can a tiny percentage (less than 1%) of gun deaths annually. We need crime fighting regulations that interrupt gang-related cycles of violence, properly hold people who use crimes accountable (e.g. automatic jail terms), social changes.

Reply
Ed Chaney
2
Ed Chaney

Already thousands of gun laws across the country. The cities with the strictest gun laws are also the ones with the highest violent crime rates. They blame easy access to firearms in neighboring cities, yet those cities don't have the crime rate they have. Figure it out.

Reply
Sum-Ting Wong
2
Sum-Ting Wong

not one of the suggested restrictions would have prevented these crimes. This is like confiscating minivans and hatchback cars because some crazy people intentionally run people over with convertables.

Reply
William Wolf
2
William Wolf

Criminals do not obey gun laws, murder is a crime, we need to get to the root cause of why people do this.

Reply
thedukelsu
2
thedukelsu

shall not be infringed

Reply
Vince Miles
2
Vince Miles

Biden has dementia.

Reply
James Miles
2
James Miles

I'm not willing to trade any of my rights for anything, let alone the perception of safety.

Reply
Robert Gardner
2
Robert Gardner

Because none of the gun control measures of the past have made any difference as seen in places with the highest violence typically have the most draconian gun regulations. There is zero correlation with how newer gun control regulations will, or could, prevent any of the tragedies of the past.

Reply
Bastardo927
2
Bastardo927

Criminals do not obey laws. Passing more will do NOTHING to actually stop gun violence.

Reply
Harry Edwards
2
Harry Edwards

we need to enforce the ones we have!

Reply
Fran Schmitt
2
Fran Schmitt

Criminals don't care how many "restrictions" law abiding citizens have. If they want the gun, they will get it. All these regulations do is keep guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens.

Reply
Ed Franz
1
Ed Franz

Cuz communists murder unarmed citizens

Reply
Max
1
Max

I believe in Freedom, not Socialism

Reply
Crash Test Dhimmi
1
Crash Test Dhimmi

We need to focus on actually ENFORCING the gun control laws we actually have. Only 4% of background check violations actually get prosecuted. It blows mind, how the left screams for more laws, but refuses to enforce the ones they already have.

Reply
Milton Contella
1
Milton Contella

Because of the binary choice offered, I could not express my nuanced thoughts on the subject so I opted for the extreme.

Reply
Scipio Augustus
0
Scipio Augustus

You can't legislate moralit or respect for your fellow man. You CAN protect yourself from the criminals, crazies, leftists and democrats.

Reply
Do you support government investment in clean energy?

Do you support government investment in clean energy?

Yes

1

No

0

Yes

1 Comment
fred raithel
0
fred raithel

Supporting the transition is not immediately profitable. Therefore, government has to provide the initial seed money. It's like the space program.

Reply

No

0 Comments
No one has commented yet
Should the courts unseal the Mar-a-Lago affidavit?

Should the courts unseal the Mar-a-Lago affidavit?

Yes

2

No

1

Yes

2 Comments
Debra Riffle
1
Debra Riffle

Transparency should always be a goal, especially in a high profile situation, where the public has lots of questions.

Reply
Vince Miles
1
Vince Miles

The people should decide if the DOJ is corrupt for themselves.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Harry D
1
Harry D

Liberal activist courts need to keep it sealed so American people will think the FBIntimidation raid and politically weaponized DOJ investigation is legitimate. If people learn the truth, they will see this is just an attempt to keep Trump from running in 2024. They really fear us not him. FJB

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT