ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Do conditions in Missouri prisons need to improve?

Do conditions in Missouri prisons need to improve?

Yes

15

No

3

Yes

5 Comments
Christopher Watson
1
Christopher Watson

We still have five open that we were told to close years ago, so yes they need to be improved. It's bad enough that we are mearly warehousing Offenders instead of teaching them a trade to benefit Society.

Reply
Jennifer M
1
Jennifer M

As an officer of doc, some of the prisons are in serious need of repairs or improvements. No ac in heat of summer is unbearable. Temps in mid 90s where officers sit. Worse in some prison cells. Most officers don't get ac. Yet ALL non custody, secretaries, case managers do.

Reply
Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Most inmates have to eat food made from the prison kitchens that most are filled with bugs, mice, and roaches. Staff do best they can to clean and sanitize but it's difficult. Plus the quality of the food leaves a lot to be desired.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Lack of staffing is a major issue. Some prisons are so short staffed that they are making officers work 56 hours a week. Four 12 hour shifts plus an 8 hour shift. Officer starting pay is $16/hour or so. Many places with far better working conditions start out much higher.

Shawn Korschgen
1
Shawn Korschgen

Because they are human beings.

Reply
Tonya Rangel
0
Tonya Rangel

My son is incarcerated at SCCC in Licking Mo, he has been denied food, medical treatment, the correctional officers broke his TV and have denied visits. The prison has mice and roaches. The food is cold. He's lost 80 lbs in 1 7 months. They don't offer GED classes. They denied him spiritual books

Reply
Jack L
0
Jack L

All prisons should be air conditioned for the safety of the officers. Prisoners who are in sweltering heat are more prone to get into fights and attack officers. And the pay of corrections officers needs to be raised so that DOC can retain staff.

Reply
Adam
Adam

Absolutely! The use of rec yards and ways to occupy inmates time like tv, library, tablets, games, etc is a huge way to keep officers safe. If they're busy doing those things, they're not thinking of ways to injure staff

No

2 Comments
Michael Leninsky
1
Michael Leninsky

The incarcerated already get to much. If anything the Officers that work the prisons need better compensation.

Reply
Max DeYoung
0
Max DeYoung

Most prisoners have committed numerous felonies before they were sent to prison. They won't change, they don't deserve a nicer place. Many wonderful senior citizens can't afford A/C for their homes. Remove cable tv, weight rooms and gyms from prisons. Prison should be very unpleasant.

Reply
Christopher Watson
Christopher Watson

All that was paid for by the inmates through the Inmate canteen fund generated by their spending. You don't get to treat them Sub-human just because they got caught, and you didn't. I see crime out here everyday by normal people.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Plus, the mail is a popular way to get drugs into a prison. If this way stops that, it's a huge win for officer safety. I do think sending mail to Florida is silly though. Should have a system here that does it too. Would be quicker.

Jack L
Jack L

You are missing the point. It`s not about being "soft on inmates". Things like rec yards and TVs and sports activities give inmates something else to do besides get into fights and attack the prison staff.

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Felon's don't deserve free stuff. I have to pay for my internet and the prisoners too. Maybe we should hire the prison systems over to China like we did all of the manufacturing. The Chinese would be happy to work for $16 an hour.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Don't let the story fool you about their mail. They all get a FREE tablet that they can use to do email and even make phone calls with! So the mail is NOT the only means to the outside world for them at all.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Their cable TV, wifi, games, weights etc are NOT free. No tax payer monies are involved. All comes from state inmate funds. Each inmate is paid a minimum of $8/month for "work" some do more, paid more. They donate to it. If it runs out, it's on them.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Tablets are pre paid for by an outside company. Again, no taxpayer monies are used for them. Inmates have to use their money to get music, use email, use phone, etc. And if they misbehave, officers can confiscate it for a certain amount of time. Reinforce good behavior

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

That's a sure fire way to have riots that can injure or kill staff members. I used to think like you until I saw how it changed their behavior. Believe me, there's plenty here to make lives miserable

Do you support phasing out Missouri's income tax?

Do you support phasing out Missouri's income tax?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Do you agree with banning sugary foods and drinks from Missouri's SNAP program?

Do you agree with banning sugary foods and drinks from Missouri's SNAP program?

Yes

26

No

14

Yes

15 Comments
Doug Fisher
3
Doug Fisher

SNAP money should (i) serve basic nutritional needs, not empty food and (ii) should help farmers, not companies making empty caloric food.

Reply
kelly shuler
3
kelly shuler

if taxpayers are paying then should require healthier eating for better health in long term

Reply
Baconface McGee
3
Baconface McGee

Our taxes shouldn’t be paying for other people’s junk food.

Reply
Lee Signup
2
Lee Signup

The United States has one of the highest rates of Type 1 diabetes incidences and high prevalence , around 1 in 6. Diet and being active, which most of us can do does wonders, whether on SNAP or not, most of us would benefit from consuming less sugar and taking the stairs.

Reply
Jimmy Ci
2
Jimmy Ci

The purpose of SNAP is to provide food-purchasing assistance to low- and no-income individuals and families, helping them maintain adequate nutrition and health. It should not be used for anything else.

Reply
Randi W
2
Randi W

People on SNAP may have a proclivity for unhealthy eating. Just as SNAP can't be used for cigarettes and alcohol, it shouldn't be wasted on surgery sodas and unhealthy snack foods.

Reply
michael
2
michael

Curbing sugary foods & drinks significantly decreases chronic illness, which saves tax $$ on health care. The healthier our food choices, the healthier we are. Healthier = happier.

Reply
Dan Mar
2
Dan Mar

Sugary foods are not a necessity. The US has an obesity crisis that is costing taxpayers hundreds of millions every year. I like the sugar tax that Europe is using to help pay for the government health care costs related to junk food consumption.

Reply
Tatyana Karak
2
Tatyana Karak

Sugary food is not essential. SNAP is for people who need to eat food they need not to go hungry. More healthy choices are beneficial for all.

Reply
Patrick
2
Patrick

So taxpayers are 100% funding SNAP and those benefits should be used properly. If SNAP recipients use benefits to buy soda, candy, cake, and other sugary products, we, the taxpayers will also be funding their healthcare for diabetes and other chronic ailments. Enough is enough.

Reply
Fat Guy Outdoors
2
Fat Guy Outdoors

I'm in favor of eliminating the entire snap program.

Reply
tom tibble
0
tom tibble

These types of food are not necessary and should focus on essential foods only.

Reply
Ellen Hall
0
Ellen Hall

Sugary foods do not sustain a healthy body. You wind up gaining fat - yes that is a weight - , decaying teeth, addiction to sugar. Add all the salt that goes along with that and there is very little nutrition to fuel your brain and the rest of your body.

Reply
Victoria Zandonella
0
Victoria Zandonella

No place in a nutritious diet!

Reply
dragon fly
0
dragon fly

diabetes is epidemic in the U$ - thanks to sugar being in everything...

Reply
dragon fly
dragon fly

if you read the NO comments, many of the people who voted NO thought they were voting NO SUGAR...

No

14 Comments
Fred
3
Fred

The poor/lower middle class aren't the problem, it's the billionaires. Prior to Reagan and trickle-down (Voodoo Economics) the bottom 90% of the population held about a third of the wealth and the 0.7% about 7% .... fast forward to today and the top 0.7% have MORE wealth than the bottom 90%!

Reply
Max
Max

Then you must be a billionaire. LOL

Brian Croner
2
Brian Croner

I'm type 1 diabetic and I need to buy candy to keep myself from dying from hypoglycemia episodes.

Reply
Max
Max

How many pounds of candy do you need per day?

Kimberly Jean
2
Kimberly Jean

Just because a person is less fortunate, doesn't mean they must live in misery at all times. The poor can enjoy life too. If they choose to buy themselves or their family a little treat, they are as entitled to do that as anyone else.

Reply
Diane Willoughby
2
Diane Willoughby

Why do we need to control people in our society? Sometimes the only way a child can get a little treat is if their parents can use a little bit of the benefits to buy something a little special.

Reply
michael
michael

Mindful what we call 'treats'! Illness producing, ultra processed 'treats' are literally a sickening way to 'treat' our kids. A handful of delicious blueberries, is a treat. Banana slices spread with peanut butter is a treat. A handful of Skittles & a diet soda is not.

Angel Lopez Jr
2
Angel Lopez Jr

If you look at the cost of less processed goods, you’ll see that you get much less bang for your buck. You spend more and get less whe. You eliminated the processed goods. Rather than hurt the consumer, the focus should be on making these processed foods healthier. This makes sense to parents.

Reply
Anonymous Individual
2
Anonymous Individual

I don't have the right to decide what poor people get to eat. Just because we give poor people money for food doesn't give us the right to take away their freedom of choice. They decide what to put into their bodies, not us. It's their bodies, their choice!!!

Reply
Patricia Abruzzise
2
Patricia Abruzzise

No one should be banning sweets from SNAP or any other program. This is just a way of controlling people and what is available for them to eat. What is next? MILK?

Reply
dragon fly
dragon fly

Trump-zombie logic...

Max
Max

You are comparing milk to Twinkies. Give everyone a break.

Baby Yoda's Dad
2
Baby Yoda's Dad

That is the only time some kids get a little snack.

Reply
Lee Signup
Lee Signup

FYI after we don't need milk after childhood. Calcium Sources: Leafy greens (kale, broccoli), tofu, beans, fortified orange juice, nuts, and seeds

michael
michael

Grapes dipped in peanut butter are a snack. So are spoonfuls of yogurt mixed with chopped fruit, plopped onto parchment paper with a popsicle stick stuck into ea & frozen. Dip in melted chocolate optional! As is chia seed pudding. All cheaper than prepackaged, ultra processed snacks & far healthier.

Max
Max

42 million people get an avg. of $178 per month of food that is paid for by the other 295 million Americans that work for a living.

Madison Haleigh
2
Madison Haleigh

Because it directly affects disabled and vulnerable populations, people with arfid, People who are trying to buy birthday cakes for their children, people who have disabilities who cannot easily make foods, people who have autism who have safe foods, people with diabetes. It's not right to police us

Reply
Max
Max

End the SNAP program except for people that will community service.

Denzel McVeigh
2
Denzel McVeigh

No because there are a lot of people that need those sodas those candies whatever for reasons like oh I don't know to raise their blood sugar up when it gets super low. It's such a misconception and some more false narrative bullshit by these dumbass Republicans like Mike kehoe and Donald Trump.

Reply
Max
Max

The same ones that need liquor, MaryJane and smokes?

Bridget Graham
1
Bridget Graham

Why police people when corporations get away with murder?

Reply
Alan Silverman
0
Alan Silverman

do the 61% yes voters refrain from sugary products?? if so remove all the products they say that shouldn't be available to snap completely from the market. or only the rich deserve....?

Reply
Jeremy Geyer
0
Jeremy Geyer

I think these kind of things put an undue burden on grocers. They cost more than they are worth

Reply
levi record
0
levi record

What is this nazi germany? Whats next? Hot dogs? Cheerios? Salt? Poor kids deserve birthday cake too. People should be treated fairly snap or no snap. If sugar is so bad then have it removed from all food. Gezzzz fdt

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT