Presidential election SquareOffs

YES

3

NO

7

YES

3 Comments
J R
0
J R

Honestly I voted for Measure 110 because I believe arresting and locking people up for possession of a small amount of drugs who aren't otherwise breaking any laws (such as DUI) is a waste of law enforcement resources. I never could have imagined the death, distruction and crime it would cause.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Should have recriminized it months ago better yet should have never decriminalized it

Reply
Dave Leverick
0
Dave Leverick

No People that use drugs don't want help they want more drugs if they pretend to want help they don't go to jail and are able to get more drugs and laugh at the system

Reply

NO

6 Comments
Marleen Naylor
0
Marleen Naylor

Fentanyl is already illegal and it carries the possibility of death when consumed. If the real possibility of death, as well as seeing friends and others dying doesn't stop people from using it, then nothing will. Removing the fentanyl from our hospitals, secure our boarders and remove the threat.

Reply
jason eichholz
0
jason eichholz

Cuz addicts gonna use

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Never dshould have passed to decriminailze drugs and reversing it now will not help,many peple are too addicted to get help now and the only thing to stop fentanyl is to close the border, democrats do not want to do that as they are hoping to allow them to vote.

Reply
Madi Bordeaux
0
Madi Bordeaux

This has been a political joke. It was morality signaling with intent to never follow thru or create the supportive infrastructure. Continual setbacks in implementation, esp. the admin side. + police refused giving citations in 110 leading to recovery, cause big mad about funding. INTENTIONAL FLOP$

Reply
Randy White
0
Randy White

Because securing our borders is the only real solution that will help the fentanyl crisis.

Reply
Lynne Labeck
0
Lynne Labeck

When recon specialist men in oregon are to old to run back to find a military wealthy base

Reply
SunnySunshinestein
SunnySunshinestein

Does your comment have a meaning?

Yes

2

No

2

Yes

2 Comments
Max DeYoung
2
Max DeYoung

This will be funnier than the old SNL shows. The new SNL shows are not very funny.

Reply
Belinda Kitchen
1
Belinda Kitchen

I want to see Kamala loose her footing and scramble to talk .

Reply

No

2 Comments
King
0
King

BORING, as usual

Reply

Yes

9

No

1

Yes

8 Comments
JP
2
JP

Silly poll.... Who's in the leadership role here 🤔?

Reply
Melissa Howiler
1
Melissa Howiler

Theresno need for kids to be on them during school

Reply
Melissa Howiler
Melissa Howiler

Recess lunch ok

Kimmy Wasatch
1
Kimmy Wasatch

Banned, of course , kids need to learn how to TALK to each other and not be on a phone but pay attention but learn in class,

Reply
Latterdaysaint
1
Latterdaysaint

Yes, it's a distraction!

Reply
Steven Huillet
0
Steven Huillet

Cellphones create too many distractions. They are the main reason kids are not learning the way they should.

Reply
Michael Caba
0
Michael Caba

Yes, for the most part. There are a few instances where they should be allowed such as the downloading of apps that help with, say, science classes and so forth. Otherwise, they are a huge distraction.

Reply
Sussie Due
0
Sussie Due

If the family needs to contact the child in an emergency, they can call the school and the school can relay the message to the child. It worked for me in the 60's and 70's, it can work now too.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Larry Ewart
0
Larry Ewart

Technology is such a major part of our lives that none of us can escape it. It comes with responsibility and accountability which seems to be the hardest part of the equation. No doubt they can be a distraction but safety and convenience play a bigger part in my opinion.

Reply

About Presidential election

Debates and polls on Presidential election from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT