Should Missouri require motorcycle helmets for all riders?

Should Missouri require motorcycle helmets for all riders?

Yes

5

No

4

Yes

5 Comments
Lenora Al Ratta
2
Lenora Al Ratta

My family all ride. I want them safe, I want the best examples for the children in my family as they grow up riding. I almost lost my brother and his gf to an accident 10 yrs ago. In hospital and rehab for a few months. Their lives were saved by his fast response and their helmets.

Reply
Belinda Kitchen
1
Belinda Kitchen

It should be a no brainier people. Duh .

Reply
HelenHighwater
1
HelenHighwater

It's self explanatory. Why risk becoming disabled and burdening your family for a lifetime?

Reply
Stephanie Nichols
1
Stephanie Nichols

I. Think. To. Make. People stay safe. All the. Time why’ll riding

Reply
Pam Riehl
0
Pam Riehl

The survival rate is higher, if in an accident, with a helmet on. Drivers are distracted, and motorcycles aren't on their radar. A helmet may be the one chance a motorcycle list has to survive, and sustain less of a permanent brain injury.

Reply

No

3 Comments
Zaos Gonzolez
1
Zaos Gonzolez

MO should require nothing of anyone.

Reply
Bill Douglas
Bill Douglas

Yet you have no problem with millions of Missouri tax dollars being spent on a new football stadium at the Univeristy of Missouri so you Columbia Mo laptop liberals and calculator communists can worship at the false alter of UM Sports like the faithful little Marxist’s you are

Barry Gilbert
0
Barry Gilbert

It should be a personal choice. But no public dollars should be spent on brain injured people who chose not to wear helmets.

Reply
Max DeYoung
0
Max DeYoung

What happened to my body my choice? Does the life in question only apply to certain individuals?

Reply
If you could only have one pet, would it be a cat or a dog?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
970 Votes

If you could only have one pet, would it be a cat or a dog?

A cat!

5

A dog!

6

A cat!

4 Comments
Ann Harbert Evensen
1
Ann Harbert Evensen

Cats are more independent.

Reply
robert shaw
0
robert shaw

Cat's are way easier to take care of.

Reply
Heidi Owen
0
Heidi Owen

They're independant.

Reply
Khara H.
0
Khara H.

I've had cats all my life and dogs most of that time. I prefer how cats interact with their humans since they seem to be more independent. We now have Bengal kittens who come to their name, play fetch

Reply

A dog!

6 Comments
k san
0
k san

I've had and love both, but a dog would be my 1 choice.

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

Dogs dig it! Cat are indignant!

Reply
Patricia Brady-McKinney
0
Patricia Brady-McKinney

I could not live without my dogs, they are so much fun, and we do dog sports. Unconditional love and affection from them is a plus. I do love cats too, but it would have to be a dog.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Cats are annoying

Reply
Mou Chat Reed
Mou Chat Reed

And dogs stick their noses where they don't belong and men just stand and watch their dog do it.

Teresa Raymond Tieben
0
Teresa Raymond Tieben

Dogs love unconditionally and show it all the timeand they are loyal! Cats not so much!

Reply
Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Yes

10

No

7

Yes

3 Comments
Vanessa Vaughan
0
Vanessa Vaughan

I ignored it just like Republican lawmakers ignore takkng a bigger stance on control on school shootings. All they do is give meaningless mouth service the whole time pocketing money from NRA lobbyists. I don't want to take anyone's guns from them, but our children should feel safe.

Reply
Felicia Megan
0
Felicia Megan

He needs to chill.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Trump got the deal today January 21st.. Trump helps Americans again. Daily.

Reply
Max
Max

Fred, keep reading CNN. LOL

Fred
Fred

There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true, and the other is to refuse to believe what is true. ― Soren Kierkegaard

No

6 Comments
Nancy Sims-VanBuren
1
Nancy Sims-VanBuren

He has us at odds with our allies, our adversaries and within our own nation due to the extreme violence with the ICE issue... civil unrest...

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Steven Watson
1
Steven Watson

He is completely insane. He and his cabinet want the natural resources, like Venezuela oil!!!

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Bryan Jones
1
Bryan Jones

We already have a military presence in Greenland. Denmark is a NATO ally. Trump should NOT be threatening the European balance or the time-tested established order. This has ramifications far beyond Trump's ego.

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

0571953
1
0571953

US should not invade other countries. Never Greenland or Venezuela. This is Trump enriching himself. Dangerous and destroying US reputation on human rights.

Reply
Max
Max

He didn't invade them.

Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

You don't own this country and you can't own Greenland matter of fact go away you prick

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Kevin Blount
1
Kevin Blount

We have existing agreements with Greenland and Denmark regarding military bases. We should expand on that, rather than threaten to take the entire country by force 'if necessary'

Reply
Max
Max

Trump made a deal that everyone loves. All over the EU.

Who to Follow
KTVZ

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT