Should local governments decide whether to ban concealed weapons in public places?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,996 Votes

Should local governments decide whether to ban concealed weapons in public places?

Yes, it's up to local govt.!

4

No, I oppose this bill!

19

Yes, it's up to local govt.!

4 Comments
Michael Miller
0
Michael Miller

If rural counties don't want it, they don't have to do it.

Reply
Foster Fell
0
Foster Fell

If the residents of a local municipality feel that existence of gun carrying people in a public venue is menacing and not conducive to free expression, then--of course--they should be able to legislate a ban.

Reply
Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

What about the rights of innocent people that have been killed and maimed? As a responsible handgun owner, I oppose assault weapons and they should NOT be allowed at peaceful protests or in our government buildings. It's intimidation and infringes on others rights

Reply
Dick Frey
0
Dick Frey

Way too many nuts with guns. If you ever take a CCP class you'd understand.

Reply
Thom
Thom

You must have been the nut as criminals cannot get a cwp.

No, I oppose this bill!

18 Comments
tim collins
3
tim collins

No I oppose... Our federal buildings I can understand. Taking my my right to defend myself and possibly others weakens us. Only law abiding citizens would be caring. They have been screened already by our Law Enforcement. It's the criminals that will carry No matter of any law.

Reply
Chris Dillard
2
Chris Dillard

It is just the first attempt to disarm the public. With this in place you will SEE MORE MASS SHOOTINGS, as they know no one will be able to defend themselves. Shows just how for these idiots have they heads up their asses. Pull all their protections as well then, be a good initiative ballot...

Reply
Jim Van Osdell
2
Jim Van Osdell

This does not address the root cause of the problem. It is nothing more than a knee jerk reaction...yet again. Great way to avoid the real problem and to disarm law abiding citizens while doing nothing to prevent the mentally ill and criminals from being armed at will.

Reply
Mike Smolich
2
Mike Smolich

Local governments have no legal authority to regulate weapons. I don't own a handgun and could care less if they are legal but it is not a local issue.

Reply
Donna
2
Donna

We all have the right to protect ourselves in public.

Reply
Pat McGowan
2
Pat McGowan

Local governments do not have the authority to limit ones ability to protect themselves or restrict rights granted by the constitution.

Reply
Mark
2
Mark

So, the only place allowed to carry concealed would be your house or apartment as all other places would be considered public. No thanks. All the mass shootings have happened in public places... Thats where I would want to be armed to protect myself. Do Not Take Anymore Of My Rights Away!!!!!!

Reply
Velma Parmelee
2
Velma Parmelee

Oppose losing my rights

Reply
Thom
2
Thom

Democrats always punish law abiding citizens and coodle criminals.

Reply
Ken Demoran
1
Ken Demoran

This is totally a ploy to get leverage on removing our 2nd amendment rights!

Reply
Smith Rogers
1
Smith Rogers

We have a right to defend our selves!

Reply
Vernon Budd
1
Vernon Budd

What would be the use of a C C W permit It's a Violation of our Second Amen Rights

Reply
Kenneth Gardner
1
Kenneth Gardner

to complicate would not know laws from deferent areas.

Reply
Robert Northrup
1
Robert Northrup

The only people who will be armed will be the dishonest ones. I feel safer knowing that now others may be armed even if I am not. I was robbed at gunpoint 3 times in CA. where almost no one carried a gun but criminals. I did use a gun and one went to prison.

Reply
Steve Carchidi
0
Steve Carchidi

It's called the 2nd Ammendment. Don't mess around.

Reply
Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

Our constitution already covers this issue. Try reading it sometime.

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

No it is against the second amendment and Gun control is nonsense, the bad guys will always have guns! What we need is more armed good citizens carrying guns so when some whacko starts shooting a good citizen can save lives by stopping them! Oregon needs, no permit concealed carry! Knives kill more

Reply
Debra Christensen
0
Debra Christensen

An invasion is coming from the south. Who is going to protect me.

Reply
Would you rather see Tim Burton make a new Batman movie or Sam Raimi make a new Spider-Man movie?

Would you rather see Tim Burton make a new Batman movie or Sam Raimi make a new Spider-Man movie?

Burton Batman

0

Raimi Spider-Man

11

Burton Batman

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Raimi Spider-Man

11 Comments
Benjamin Szczegolski-Jacobs
1
Benjamin Szczegolski-Jacobs

I like Raimi as a director more and frankly seeing the first draught of the 89 script makes me like Burton even less. Havent ever really loved 89 as much as others to begin with, sonce I didnt grow up with it.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
1
Mutale Mwananshiku

Raimi cause at least he loves spider-man and would try to make a character driven story about peter , whereas burton doesnt care for batman and another batman film by him would be all visuals and not a character driven story about batman.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

Burton Batman, while still a notable and fondly remembered version, is (imo) seeming less influential and culturally relevant the more years that have passed since its release. Conversely, Sam Raimi's Spider-Man seems way more influential again, and is, for me, the more definitive take of the two!

Reply
Spencer Nielsen
1
Spencer Nielsen

Easy! Burton has yet to make a good Batman movie, Raimi made two great films with Spider-Man.

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Burton is much less talented

Reply
Smol-Vampire
0
Smol-Vampire

I want Raimi to redeem himself for the biggest let down

Reply
Jay-El Lewis
0
Jay-El Lewis

While I enjoyed both Sam just had more films, Norton only had that one Batman film with Michael Keaton

Reply
Robert Wild
0
Robert Wild

The Raimi Spider-man films feel like an overarching story without a satisfying ending. I just have more nostalgia for Raimi Spider-man. Literally nothing would make me happier than hearing that elfman spider-man score over the opening credits of a new Raimi Spider-man movie one more time.

Reply
Chewbaacca's Lover
0
Chewbaacca's Lover

It would be a harder choice if it was the Keaton universe without Burton, even than I might have to go with Spider Man, Raimi is the easy choice with Burton the way he is now.

Reply
SpedeVesku
0
SpedeVesku

Burton's best days are behind him and even during those he wasn't perfect. Raimi still seems to "got it", even if I haven't loved all of his more recent work either. Plus, his Spider-Man movies ended on a worse note than Burton's Batmans, so there's a bigger need for redemption.

Reply
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

Now I assume that both Tim Burton and Sam Raimi are very different people than when they left their projects, but since there's been less time in between 2007 and now than there is 1992 and now, I assume that Raimi has retained more of his sensibilities that made his version work.

Reply
Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Yes

10

No

7

Yes

3 Comments
Vanessa Vaughan
0
Vanessa Vaughan

I ignored it just like Republican lawmakers ignore takkng a bigger stance on control on school shootings. All they do is give meaningless mouth service the whole time pocketing money from NRA lobbyists. I don't want to take anyone's guns from them, but our children should feel safe.

Reply
Felicia Megan
0
Felicia Megan

He needs to chill.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Trump got the deal today January 21st.. Trump helps Americans again. Daily.

Reply
Max
Max

Fred, keep reading CNN. LOL

Fred
Fred

There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true, and the other is to refuse to believe what is true. ― Soren Kierkegaard

No

6 Comments
Nancy Sims-VanBuren
1
Nancy Sims-VanBuren

He has us at odds with our allies, our adversaries and within our own nation due to the extreme violence with the ICE issue... civil unrest...

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Steven Watson
1
Steven Watson

He is completely insane. He and his cabinet want the natural resources, like Venezuela oil!!!

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Bryan Jones
1
Bryan Jones

We already have a military presence in Greenland. Denmark is a NATO ally. Trump should NOT be threatening the European balance or the time-tested established order. This has ramifications far beyond Trump's ego.

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

0571953
1
0571953

US should not invade other countries. Never Greenland or Venezuela. This is Trump enriching himself. Dangerous and destroying US reputation on human rights.

Reply
Max
Max

He didn't invade them.

Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

You don't own this country and you can't own Greenland matter of fact go away you prick

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Kevin Blount
1
Kevin Blount

We have existing agreements with Greenland and Denmark regarding military bases. We should expand on that, rather than threaten to take the entire country by force 'if necessary'

Reply
Max
Max

Trump made a deal that everyone loves. All over the EU.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT