Asked by
KTVZ
Should local governments decide whether to ban concealed weapons in public places?
Yes, it's up to local govt.!
No, I oppose this bill!
No I oppose... Our federal buildings I can understand. Taking my my right to defend myself and possibly others weakens us. Only law abiding citizens would be caring. They have been screened already by our Law Enforcement. It's the criminals that will carry No matter of any law.
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 01:13:56 -0500
Reply
It is just the first attempt to disarm the public. With this in place you will SEE MORE MASS SHOOTINGS, as they know no one will be able to defend themselves. Shows just how for these idiots have they heads up their asses. Pull all their protections as well then, be a good initiative ballot...
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:29:08 -0500
Reply
This does not address the root cause of the problem. It is nothing more than a knee jerk reaction...yet again. Great way to avoid the real problem and to disarm law abiding citizens while doing nothing to prevent the mentally ill and criminals from being armed at will.
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:15:03 -0500
Reply
Local governments have no legal authority to regulate weapons. I don't own a handgun and could care less if they are legal but it is not a local issue.
Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:54:09 -0500
Reply
Local governments do not have the authority to limit ones ability to protect themselves or restrict rights granted by the constitution.
Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:14:53 -0500
Reply
So, the only place allowed to carry concealed would be your house or apartment as all other places would be considered public. No thanks. All the mass shootings have happened in public places... Thats where I would want to be armed to protect myself. Do Not Take Anymore Of My Rights Away!!!!!!
Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:13:56 -0500
Reply
This is totally a ploy to get leverage on removing our 2nd amendment rights!
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:18:26 -0500
Reply
What would be the use of a C C W permit It's a Violation of our Second Amen Rights
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:07:44 -0500
Reply
to complicate would not know laws from deferent areas.
Thu, 25 Mar 2021 23:53:01 -0500
Reply
The only people who will be armed will be the dishonest ones. I feel safer knowing that now others may be armed even if I am not. I was robbed at gunpoint 3 times in CA. where almost no one carried a gun but criminals. I did use a gun and one went to prison.
Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:04:05 -0500
Reply
Our constitution already covers this issue. Try reading it sometime.
Fri, 07 May 2021 12:46:17 -0400
Reply
No it is against the second amendment and Gun control is nonsense, the bad guys will always have guns! What we need is more armed good citizens carrying guns so when some whacko starts shooting a good citizen can save lives by stopping them! Oregon needs, no permit concealed carry! Knives kill more
Tue, 06 Apr 2021 15:08:36 -0500
Reply
An invasion is coming from the south. Who is going to protect me.
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:14:17 -0500
Reply
Asked by
Asked by
If rural counties don't want it, they don't have to do it.
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:07:50 -0500
ReplyIf the residents of a local municipality feel that existence of gun carrying people in a public venue is menacing and not conducive to free expression, then--of course--they should be able to legislate a ban.
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:50:45 -0500
ReplyWhat about the rights of innocent people that have been killed and maimed? As a responsible handgun owner, I oppose assault weapons and they should NOT be allowed at peaceful protests or in our government buildings. It's intimidation and infringes on others rights
Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:27:56 -0500
ReplyWay too many nuts with guns. If you ever take a CCP class you'd understand.
Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:54:48 -0500
Reply