Oregon SquareOffs

16%
Yes

2

84%
No WINNER

21

16%
Yes

hi
0
hi

The people have spoken.

Reply

84%
No

Ron Johnson
5
Ron Johnson

Why should 3-4 countys tell the rest of the state what to do.

Reply
P Robbins
P Robbins

because they comprise most of the *people*

Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
4
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

M-114 will do nothing to keep guns from the hands of criminals. M-114 only works to further prevent the law biding citizen from their legal right to purchase a firearm

Reply
Steven Huillet
2
Steven Huillet

It's not legal!

Reply
Poo
2
Poo

Unconstitutional. “Assault Weapons” a term that the ATF has struggled to define and most modern countries define as select fire aka full auto. Red flag laws still let people drive vehicles, own knives and other deadly weapons. Blame the bad people not a piece of metal!

Reply
Your Face
2
Your Face

Shouldn't even be up for discussion. Move somewhere else if you are afraid of armed law abiding citizens.

Reply
William Chivers
2
William Chivers

All this measure does is it makes it harder for law abiding citizens to own firearms. No matter how hard we try to keep firearms away from those who shouldn't have them, those people will always figure out how to get them. I believe crime would be better deterred if open carry were legal.

Reply
Kenneth Converse
Kenneth Converse

Open carry is legal. Conceal carry without a permit is illegal.

Alexander Hada
2
Alexander Hada

Law empowers and gives carte blanche to police to decide who gets a firearm. Which means marginalized LGBT+ and POC will be denied in favor of right wing extremists. Would also increase policing in POC communities via magazine ban & also create a database that would target marginalized communities.

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

Oh baloney.

Jim Newton
2
Jim Newton

Measure 114 has several concerning components that likely violate the US constitution, cause an undue burden on the local police and is essentially a money/tax black hole.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
2
Latterdaysaint

It's against the 2nd amendment

Reply
Paul Owen
1
Paul Owen

It would be the toughest gun law in the United States and as well seen in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York City and look at Australia. Tough Gun laws do not work I am not against the background checks, I think that religion needs to stay out of politics and use their money to spread Christianity

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

Sorry, I'll take my Christianity any where I please.

Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

Even Jesus said to sell your cloak an buy a sword.

sandra zollman
0
sandra zollman

Government needs to stop trying to destroy our Constitutional rights. 114 is the Democrats means to deny guns to those that "don't pass our tests". Taking a shooting class is just another tax and has nothing to do with gun owning rights. It is not governments business to know who owns guns.

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

How about locking up criminals instead? They have no regard for a "Law" in the first place.

Reply
Jerry Springer
0
Jerry Springer

“Shall not infringe “

Reply
Brandi K.
0
Brandi K.

Unconstitutional

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

No absolutely not. The constitution is what it is to keep unconstitutional things like this from happening. 114 is in violation of the second amendment and would do harm not any good. It will not keep criminals from getting guns, it will hamper honest people. Backwards thinking.

Reply
Jonathan Wichunu
0
Jonathan Wichunu

Measure 114 is unconstitutional. It should never have made it onto the ballot.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

When will people understand that the violence is a people probLem and not a gun problem. Until people are held accountable, charged and not realesed early or without bail, nothing will change. Decrimalizing drugs contributes to the problem. Too much liberal, left policies.

Reply

Yes

1

No

5

Yes

No one has commented yet

No

Rick Allen
1
Rick Allen

I think the fire department needs and should have the needed funds definitely. However it should come from other County department spending! I pay over $7,200.00 per year in property tax, thats $600.00 per month. Thats way to much now!, it needs to come other from county funds!.

Reply
Paul Owen
1
Paul Owen

To much monéy. We are all affected by higher prices maybe .25-.30 property taxes are high in Central Oregon. Next will be the police, the school district, the parks dept. Every agency wants more what about the elderly trying to keep their housing?

Reply
Alma
0
Alma

No, we already pay so much in taxes that you're going to add to the homeless situation. Many people are on a fixed income. These taxes are going to price people out of a home.

Reply
sandra zollman
0
sandra zollman

Take money from Parks and Rec. We most certainly don't need any more parks or trails. Taxes aren't for entertainment. The city is spending like drunken sailors and are a big reason that Bend is unaffordable. Property taxes are much to high. We need conservatives in city positions.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

No more tax increases

Reply
CB
CB

Don't call 911 if your house catches on fire if you're not willing to vote for this. And in DWR, there's a much higher probability.

Yes

0

No

8

Yes

No one has commented yet

No

sandra zollman
0
sandra zollman

Too much for housing the homeless. Get them jobs and they can house themselves instead of making taxpayers homeless paying for them. It's not my job to support non workers.

Reply
Franklin Bullwheel
0
Franklin Bullwheel

Need more infrastructure repair and replacement.

Reply
Paul Owen
0
Paul Owen

If we don't change the curriculum to teach the kids state capitals and the Constitution, fax returns, and all United States History and real world math. Then what's the use of spending all this money into education

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Thowing good money after bad and will not solve problems. Economy is bad enough and people are having hard times, Kotek need to stop the out of control spending.

Reply
GT Thomas
0
GT Thomas

Typical tax and spend liberal raising Oregon's budget by Billions and spending critical reserve funds. Oregonians knew this would happen when uber liberal got elected by Portland.

Reply
Steven Huillet
0
Steven Huillet

Democrats just want to spend, spend, spend. They love throwing money away for no good reasons. Just more waste put on the tax payers backs.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Criminalize drug don't spend more on homelessness

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Instead of spending on homelessness how about criminalize drugs

Reply

About Oregon

Debates and polls on Oregon from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT