.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
.jpg?1762493919 "Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?")
Asked by
YES
NO
Fentanyl is already illegal and it carries the possibility of death when consumed. If the real possibility of death, as well as seeing friends and others dying doesn't stop people from using it, then nothing will. Removing the fentanyl from our hospitals, secure our boarders and remove the threat.
Reply
Never dshould have passed to decriminailze drugs and reversing it now will not help,many peple are too addicted to get help now and the only thing to stop fentanyl is to close the border, democrats do not want to do that as they are hoping to allow them to vote.
Reply
This has been a political joke. It was morality signaling with intent to never follow thru or create the supportive infrastructure. Continual setbacks in implementation, esp. the admin side. + police refused giving citations in 110 leading to recovery, cause big mad about funding. INTENTIONAL FLOP$
Reply
Because securing our borders is the only real solution that will help the fentanyl crisis.
Reply
When recon specialist men in oregon are to old to run back to find a military wealthy base
Reply
Asked by
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Honestly I voted for Measure 110 because I believe arresting and locking people up for possession of a small amount of drugs who aren't otherwise breaking any laws (such as DUI) is a waste of law enforcement resources. I never could have imagined the death, distruction and crime it would cause.
ReplyShould have recriminized it months ago better yet should have never decriminalized it
ReplyNo People that use drugs don't want help they want more drugs if they pretend to want help they don't go to jail and are able to get more drugs and laugh at the system
Reply