Will recriminalizing drug possession help with the fentanyl crisis?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
837 Votes

Will recriminalizing drug possession help with the fentanyl crisis?

YES

3

NO

7

YES

3 Comments
J R
0
J R

Honestly I voted for Measure 110 because I believe arresting and locking people up for possession of a small amount of drugs who aren't otherwise breaking any laws (such as DUI) is a waste of law enforcement resources. I never could have imagined the death, distruction and crime it would cause.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Should have recriminized it months ago better yet should have never decriminalized it

Reply
Dave Leverick
0
Dave Leverick

No People that use drugs don't want help they want more drugs if they pretend to want help they don't go to jail and are able to get more drugs and laugh at the system

Reply

NO

6 Comments
Marleen Naylor
0
Marleen Naylor

Fentanyl is already illegal and it carries the possibility of death when consumed. If the real possibility of death, as well as seeing friends and others dying doesn't stop people from using it, then nothing will. Removing the fentanyl from our hospitals, secure our boarders and remove the threat.

Reply
jason eichholz
0
jason eichholz

Cuz addicts gonna use

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Never dshould have passed to decriminailze drugs and reversing it now will not help,many peple are too addicted to get help now and the only thing to stop fentanyl is to close the border, democrats do not want to do that as they are hoping to allow them to vote.

Reply
Madi Bordeaux
0
Madi Bordeaux

This has been a political joke. It was morality signaling with intent to never follow thru or create the supportive infrastructure. Continual setbacks in implementation, esp. the admin side. + police refused giving citations in 110 leading to recovery, cause big mad about funding. INTENTIONAL FLOP$

Reply
Randy White
0
Randy White

Because securing our borders is the only real solution that will help the fentanyl crisis.

Reply
Lynne Labeck
0
Lynne Labeck

When recon specialist men in oregon are to old to run back to find a military wealthy base

Reply
SunnySunshinestein
SunnySunshinestein

Does your comment have a meaning?

Should ghost guns be banned?

Should ghost guns be banned?

Yes

1

No

5

Yes

1 Comment
Renee
0
Renee

There is no reason for a person to have a gun that can not be registered. If you can't register it, you don't need it.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Guns should only be feared by criminals. Our justice system has protected criminals and prosecuted Hero's.

No

4 Comments
Zaos Gonzolez
2
Zaos Gonzolez

Let's ban taxes first.

Reply
Jeff H
1
Jeff H

'ghost gun' is a term created to fear monger the public. before the GCA of 1968 almost all guns were unserialized. Serializatin rarely helps in solving any crime, it just tels yuo who the gun was stolen from. Self made firearms get used in less than 0.01% of crimes.

Reply
Max DeYoung
1
Max DeYoung

No where in the Constitution is a requirement for a serial number on a weapon. The requirement for serial numbers on firearms began in 1958, and only applied to licensed manufacturers and importers. Firearms made before the Gun Control Act of 1968 do not need to be marked with a serial number.

Reply
Will Mason
1
Will Mason

I dont see exceptions for ghost weapons in the constitution. "Shall not be infringed" does not include exceptions.

Reply
Should artifical food dye be banned?

Should artifical food dye be banned?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Who to Follow
KTVZ

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT