Should there be a cap on political ad spending?

News

Asked by Sai Gohel

179 Votes

Should there be a cap on political ad spending?

Q: Should there be a cap on political ad spending?

80% voted "Yes, favors the rich" vs 20% voted "No, it’s fair game". 179 total votes on this debate.

80%

Yes, favors the rich Yes, favors the rich

20%

No, it’s fair game No, it’s fair game

80%

Yes, favors the rich

“[Bloomberg] spent $132 million on television advertising; $757,000 in airfare; $3.3 million on polling; and $8.2 million on digital advertising” – NBC News

“[Bloomberg] spent $132 million on television advertising; $757,000 in airfare; $3.3 million on polling; and $8.2 million on digital advertising” – NBC News Show Less

1 Comment

k san

When PACs can spend wantonly, it means that our elections are being bought by those with the deepest pockets. Is that what we want? The SCOTUS endorsing Citizens United was a supremely BAD decision!

20%

No, it’s fair game

“One of the wealthiest people in the world, Bloomberg can afford it. But it’s still a risky bet, as Bloomberg isn’t on the ballot in any of the first four states.” – NBC News R... Show More

“One of the wealthiest people in the world, Bloomberg can afford it. But it’s still a risky bet, as Bloomberg isn’t on the ballot in any of the first four states.” – NBC News Read the full article from NBC: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/blog/meet-press-blog-latest-news-analysis-data-driving-political-discussion-n988541/ncrd1128251#blogHeader Show Less

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

More from Sai Gohel

Related

Should there be a cap on political ad spending?

80% Yes, favors the rich Yes, favors the rich

20% No, it’s fair game No, it’s fair game

80% Yes, favors the rich

20% No, it’s fair game

Tags

80%

Yes, favors the rich Yes, favors the rich

20%

No, it’s fair game No, it’s fair game

80%

Yes, favors the rich

20%

No, it’s fair game