Should the Senate discipline Josh Hawley for his role in last week's events at the Capitol?

Should the Senate discipline Josh Hawley for his role in last week's events at the Capitol?

Yes. He encouraged the rioters.

12

No. He was doing his job.

10

Yes. He encouraged the rioters.

Should the Senate discipline Josh Hawley for his role in last week's events at the Capitol?
12 Comments
Rick Garrett
1
Rick Garrett

Because is just adding fuel to the flame and there is no evidence of wide spread fraud!! I am personally disgusted with Republicans period!

Reply
Ed Merzlak
1
Ed Merzlak

In my opinion, Hawley is guilty of sedition, publicly raising his fist in support of the rioters. Remember, 5 people lost their lives. Censure does not remove him from office, he retains his title, stature, and power to vote. He is an embarrasment to the people of Missouri and he must be removed.

Reply
Travis Follett
1
Travis Follett

He knows there was no fraud. He's just using the situation to ingratiate himself to trump's base. He helped pour fuel on that fire.

Reply
Sheila Plummer
0
Sheila Plummer

Absolutely! This Missouri resident is embarrassed by his non-representation of a majority of his fellow Missourians.

Reply
dglobetrotter
0
dglobetrotter

He is not following the constitution, and spreads lies.

Reply
Crystal Long
0
Crystal Long

He helped with the riot on the capital he should resign

Reply
R Talbott
0
R Talbott

I believe he acted without consideration of common good, and acted in what he thought might increase his position for future political opportunities. Might have back fired. He should be censured by Congress.

Reply
Audrey Shewmaker
0
Audrey Shewmaker

He did encourage rioters. And he should be disciplined.

Reply
Jennifer Tiff
0
Jennifer Tiff

He knows there was no voter fraud. He knows Trump was lying and he backed it. He tried to take away our democracy and replace it with a dictatorship. I think Gobbels was a great comparison to Hawleys behavior in this attempted government coupe.

Reply
Nina Ogle
0
Nina Ogle

The courts decided there was no election fraud and he knows this. He is not upholding his oath to support the Constitution.

Reply
Cecil Schick
0
Cecil Schick

He is now a trumplican and not a true Republican. He says he was speaking for the millions I think that's just what the election and all the recounts did. Your just a trumppet a puppet for the slime ball trump!

Reply
Dennis Gravedoni Sr.
0
Dennis Gravedoni Sr.

And because he used the riots for a fund raising event, even while the capital was under siege.

Reply

No. He was doing his job.

Should the Senate discipline Josh Hawley for his role in last week's events at the Capitol?
10 Comments
Kathy Palmatory
0
Kathy Palmatory

It is absolutely his right to question the results an election with so many obvious irregularities - just doing the job he was elected to do!!!

Reply
Eric Endsley
0
Eric Endsley

He is representing Missouri majority of people.

Reply
Vernon Taylor
0
Vernon Taylor

So the same ones who complain about overturning an election - now want to - because he's got the haters scared.

Reply
Mary Jane Thomson Jackson
0
Mary Jane Thomson Jackson

Sen. Hawley was doing his job, as we all know there was fraud in this election.

Reply
Derek Burks
0
Derek Burks

Its no different than when democrats did the same thing in 3 elections since 2000. If they see tom foolery. They are obligated by law to report it.

Reply
stacy Hospital
0
stacy Hospital

He is a great guy and is for the people! He believes that there was a problem with voter fraud as 80 million Americans do !! People should leave him alone !!!

Reply
David Apel
0
David Apel

What he did was totally constitutional and Pelosi did it in 2009,

Reply
Johnie Brauer
0
Johnie Brauer

He is doing his job by representing his constituents. I totally agree with him and very proud of him!! We need more like him!!

Reply
Bill Whisenand
0
Bill Whisenand

Because he was within his legal right to do it.

Reply
Will Mason
0
Will Mason

Asking to look at the election did not incite violence. 4 yeats of leftist lies did.

Reply
Should Missouri's U.S. senators support the "one big beautiful bill?"

Should Missouri's U.S. senators support the "one big beautiful bill?"

Yes

5

No

16

Yes

4 Comments
Charles Barnes
1
Charles Barnes

This is a good start and the best that could be passed. Don't let perfect be the enemy of great.

Reply
Dennis Willems
1
Dennis Willems

Everyone should support the bill.

Reply
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

They should support the president and the constituents who voted them in. That includes us who believe you work for what you get. No handouts!

Reply
Toasty
1
Toasty

The cuts didn't go deep enough. Ex. Musk's criticisms about how the EV mandates would be cut (good thing), but no cuts to the auto industry subsidies (bad thing). The liberal/socialist media is already lying to folks how this bill is throwing grandma under the bus. Proof? Look at the 'No' comments.

Reply

No

16 Comments
Jeffery Schuyler
1
Jeffery Schuyler

It is a wealth transfer Bill: From the poorest Americans to the richest.

Reply
Anita Grace Ward
1
Anita Grace Ward

Please don’t do that! Trump promised no cuts to Medicaid but her we are just 5months into his term and he is doing that!

Reply
Laura Cochran
1
Laura Cochran

Help for the rich to get richer and it puts more average people in worse situations. Don't cut Medicaid or Social Security

Reply
David Keller
0
David Keller

They are going to take Medicaid away from 16 million people and who knows what else. Josh Hawley has got to go if he votes yes.

Reply
T Boy
0
T Boy

I do not like the tax cuts which would cause the reduction of Medicaid

Reply
John Harbaugh
0
John Harbaugh

Tax reductions for the super rich ... doesn't make sense when it cuts necessary programs and helps inflate our Country's debt

Reply
Porter Bingham
0
Porter Bingham

The only way they can make this look like it doesn’t completely destroy the deficit is by making certain tax cuts and spending increases “temporary.” I support the tax cuts, as long as they are met with subsequent spending cuts. The true burden of government is what it spends, not what it taxes.

Reply
Keith
0
Keith

We will vote every last Republican out of office. Stealing food and Healthcare from [anyone] to profit the rich is an act of war and shall be treated as such.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Fox News Poll: 6 in 10 are proud of US today – the most in more than a decade 7 in 10 voters think the United States is the best place to live The liberals are in PANIC mode LOL

Lorrie Tucker
0
Lorrie Tucker

It would increase the national debt by about 3 trillion dollars, and take away necessary infrastructure, all while lowering taxes on the wealthy.

Reply
Tracy Trapp
0
Tracy Trapp

As a customer of the Affordable Care Act I find it appalling that the two senators from Missouri would even consider supporting this bill that will potentially triple my monthly premium and also cut benefits. They should be ashamed of themselves for bowing down to the President. Checks and balances

Reply
Stephanie Leavendusky
0
Stephanie Leavendusky

It will hurt many people in Missouri.

Reply
Brad Chance
0
Brad Chance

He said he would support the people who elected him. It's simple

Reply
Chris Ketcherside
0
Chris Ketcherside

You are kidding, right? Missouri congressmen need to read their job descriptions and represent their constituents. Voting for this bill is a betrayal of the will of the people.

Reply
Paula Garrett
0
Paula Garrett

Millionaires and billionaires don't need a tax break as much some people need health care. Also, social security's fund needs fixed which would have been a better use for that $45 million he wasted on a parade. Trump has all his priorities wrong.

Reply
James Itczak
0
James Itczak

This is a rash and extreme bill and someone needs to speak up and slow this down, people are going to suffer for this,

Reply
Gary Carter
0
Gary Carter

They were elected to represent their constituents, ALL CONSTITUENTS not just those whom they perceived voted for them. Don't let anyone hold their vote hostage.

Reply
Was SCOTUS right to limit federal powers for nationwide injunctions on executive orders?

Was SCOTUS right to limit federal powers for nationwide injunctions on executive orders?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT