Yes

3 Comments
Frederick Wolfe
2
Frederick Wolfe

The Sheriff is an elected official. Elected officials give their opinions all the time and quite often not very nicely. KESQ'S reporting appeared biased against the Sheriff, is that ethical?

Reply
Nine Wire
1
Nine Wire

3017 votes. 17 Liberal smack talkers. 18% of the vote. Go put your head back in the sand and leave the thinking to the other 82% of us with a freaking brain.

Reply
Alison Ziemkiewicz
0
Alison Ziemkiewicz

Any person should be able to voice thier endorsement in uniform. Plenty of government officials endorse publicly and are not put under the microscope because they aren't wearing a uniform? They are still a public official period. Let's not forget freedom of speech people.

Reply
Patricia S
Patricia S

Of course its OK, but a proven Felon, along with other crimes, bankruptcies (countless). If he can't run his own house, how the hell can he run the country!!!! Jusf poor judgement on Bianco. If Bianco is tired.....just QUIT!!!!

No

13 Comments
Patricia S
1
Patricia S

Especially if candidate is a convicted Felon, 34 times,regardless of who he is.

Reply
Patricia S
Patricia S

Especially one who has been convicted of 34 felonies!!!!

Ed Drahos
0
Ed Drahos

There's a reason why this is not done in any of our armed forces! There simply no difference.

Reply
David Lambert
0
David Lambert

I penned letters of recommendation and laundered drug money for PSPD. They can't be trusted.

Reply
Tami R
0
Tami R

Military service members are prohibited from endorsing a candidate or position while on active duty; why should it be different for law enforcement?

Reply
Erica Greathouse
0
Erica Greathouse

Bianco gave the appearance (as was likely the intent) that this is somehow official. This act warrants a recall. How can ANY law enforcement officer, let alone the TOP law officer, countenance electing a FELON?? Saying the felon's the only one who can get a handle on crime is LUDICROUS.

Reply
Patricia S
Patricia S

Exactly, if Bianco is "tired" ( his word).....then QUIT!!!!

Jeremy Brown
0
Jeremy Brown

A lawman celebrating lawlessness is surreal. He's also forgetting that Trump committed real crimes that are not as make-believe as his unhinged rant with very flawed logic. That this is even a news story, this man should NOT have ANY authority over ANYONE.

Reply
MaryRose Wallace
0
MaryRose Wallace

He has his right to his opinion however he should not use his position to influence others.

Reply
Mark Cosenza
0
Mark Cosenza

Chad seems to be on a power trip,instead of protecting and serving the people who elected him. His endorsement is a slap in the face to his fellow men in blue who were at the capital on J6 putting their lives at risk because of the man he is endorsing.

Reply
Michael
0
Michael

Supporting Trump after two impeachments, his involvement with keeping top secret documents, his three trials in which three separate Jurors found Trump guilty: 1) Guilty of Sexual Abuse 2) Guilty of harassing his victim3) 34 counts in NYC. Sheriff Bianco has lost respect by many citizens. So Sad.

Reply
Michael
Michael

Sherriff Bianco, a MAGA Reich member? I didn't see that coming, did anyone?

robert rawley
0
robert rawley

Bianco endorses a man found guilty by 12 jurors of 34 felony counts in NY after seeing all the evidence. He refused to enforce mask orders of the governor during COVID. Rather than enforcing & allowing courts to decide, he endangered deputies, staff & the public. He appears a tyrant not a servant.

Reply
Bill Cranham
0
Bill Cranham

Our chief law enforcement officer for the County of Riverside, (selective enforcement at best). has endorsed a convicted felon for POTUS not only while in uniform, but using a taxpayer provided vehicle as a backdrop. CHAD BIANCO is a sick joke! Our military are not allowed to campaign in uniform!

Reply
Alan Dusty Bowley
0
Alan Dusty Bowley

The uniform is to protect and serve, NOT try to use it To influence people

Reply
Ron Dorsheimer
0
Ron Dorsheimer

Makes you wonder if he'll serve and protect people with other political views.

Reply
Patricia S
Patricia S

Actually, he did not, during Covid!!!!!

Are you happy to see local police taking part in immigration operations?

Are you happy to see local police taking part in immigration operations?

Yes

6

No

8

Yes

6 Comments
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

Of course, isn't locking up people who are criminals their jobs?

Reply
Thomas OSullivan
1
Thomas OSullivan

This is a matter of law and order. I have no problem with immigrants coming to this country LEGALLY. Immigrants built this country and are a valuable asset but there is a LEGAL process that must be followed. Biden, Majorkas were disasters when it came to illegal immigration.

Reply
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

We might get a bit closer to having fair elections without those voting who aren't even citizens.

Reply
Fred
Fred

Yes, that would be a problem that needs to be addressed ... if it actually existed.

Toasty
1
Toasty

Immigration laws exist for a reason. I can agree our current immigration process is too complicated, expensive, and ripe with corruption. The solution is to change the process, not allow people to stay here illegally.

Reply
Jim Rosenberg
1
Jim Rosenberg

Illegal is Illegal, no matter the situation. Law enforcement is there for a reason, to enforce the laws. If I was in another country illegally, then law enforcement in that country would do the same thing, but probably jail time first. Without laws and law enforcement there would be anarchy.

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
1
Zaos Gonzolez

Just like a Macy's sale, "they all must go!"

Reply

No

6 Comments
Jennifer Parsons
2
Jennifer Parsons

This is not a matter of legality. "IlLeGaL" immigration is a misdemeanor, like jaywalking or speeding. That people are being apprehended at immigration court dates, schools, and churches shows that these people are not dangerous nor violent. And finally, detention without due process is kidnapping.

Reply
Jeffery Schuyler
2
Jeffery Schuyler

This is not only anti-american, but it is cruel, inhumane and counterproductive. Trump has managed to convince half our Country that 65 million immigrants are both an imminent threat and less than human. Worse, most of the people believing these lies are Christians.

Reply
Bobbi Meyer
2
Bobbi Meyer

Immigrants aren't the problem, politicians are

Reply
Leslie
1
Leslie

They should focus on protecting the community from the reported crimes and not engaging in the current racial profiling that immigration authorities have been doing.

Reply
Paula Stanley
1
Paula Stanley

Police resources should not be used for ICE operations. Congress just voted for an unbelievably huge budget for their police state. Don’t use local community resources!

Reply
Sara Kalinowski
0
Sara Kalinowski

This is a hard question. ICE isn't explaining anything or identifying themselves. PO's might follow protocol,better. However, they shouldn't have to be involved.To be fair though, I think we spend too much unnecessary time on immigration & nothing else that truly matters.

Reply
Are you concerned about AI interfering with national security?

Are you concerned about AI interfering with national security?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT