this ruling is specifically about his overwhelming and consistent ‘intention to deceive’ and is designed to encourage him to stop behaving in that way, at least in New York. Similarly in the Carrol case to persuade him to stop mouthing off and lying about... well… everything
This coming out 30 yrs after the events? Anything to discourage others for stepping up to do humanitarian acts! It shows he was human, didn't walk on water...but he worked tireless for workers rights for the field workers over the years and a better life for their families and the future.
this ruling is specifically about his overwhelming and consistent ‘intention to deceive’ and is designed to encourage him to stop behaving in that way, at least in New York. Similarly in the Carrol case to persuade him to stop mouthing off and lying about... well… everything
Reply