Missouri governor SquareOffs

Yes. Missouri needs mask rules.

10

No. It's an individual choice.

4

Yes. Missouri needs mask rules.

Should Missouri have a mask mandate amid the rapid rise in coronavirus cases?
10 Comments
Diane Maxwell
0
Diane Maxwell

Masks have proven to slow the spread of Covid-19 and protect both the wearer and others in his/her proximity. Unfortunately even with a mandate, not everyone wears masks properly. Gov. Parson made the statement that Missourians are smart--that has proven to be untrue. We NEED a state-wide mandate.

Reply
Jarvis Jones
0
Jarvis Jones

There's way too many very selfish and highly Inconsiderate people walking around without a Mask on; With that said, it will take that much longer to get the Virus under Control. A State-Wide Mask Mandate would be right on par with the Current Virus Crisis. Mask's Help To Save Lives!!!!

Reply
Jeannie Harmon Miller
0
Jeannie Harmon Miller

I believe in science and health care workers. They are adamant about the importance of wearing a masks. I do not want to die nor do I want to cause any one's death. Therefore I wear a mask and hope others do too. IT IS REALLY QUITE SIMPLE!

Reply
Sue Evans
0
Sue Evans

The problem with leaving that decision to each county/city leader is putting them in the hot seat without any backing. Also, the county I live in, a lot of the people have to work in another county. It won't do any good if my county mandates mask but the county I work in does not.

Reply
Gordon Messinger
0
Gordon Messinger

NO ONE WILL DO IT ON THERE OWN

Reply
Don Mininger
0
Don Mininger

People NEED to practice wearing a mask in public, And staying socially distant. A statewide mandate is Necessary, IMO. If some refuse to do so, they can stay home.

Reply
Sandy Wishon
0
Sandy Wishon

Because some people need to be led to their decision. It’s the right thing to do. In view of so many people sick!

Reply
Ryan Reed
0
Ryan Reed

Unfortunately in such an individualistic society people cannot be counted on to make the right decisions for the community at an individual level. This needs to come from the top down. If your actions negatively impact others then İt shouldnt be a considered a right (think smoking in restaurants).

Reply
Carmen Leanne
0
Carmen Leanne

Masks help stop the spread of covid-19. The hospitals cannot take anymore. Healthcare workers are exhausted. Now is not the time to become apathetic. I wear my mask to protect you. This is the United States of America. We could use a bit more on the United front. I shouldn't have to tell you to care

Reply
Michelle Devous
0
Michelle Devous

Wearing a mask is a small price to pay to help stay safe and to help others stay safe. Any death due to this virus is too many and our country has already lost a quarter of a million people and counting. I pray for all who have suffered from their losses due to the Covid-19 virus.

Reply

No. It's an individual choice.

Should Missouri have a mask mandate amid the rapid rise in coronavirus cases?
4 Comments
Bethany Voelker Tillmann
1
Bethany Voelker Tillmann

As a healthcare provider that actively works in the COVID field I strongly believe that wearing a mask is an individual choice. Mandating won’t change culture, educating the individual will increase mask usage. Remember when seat belts became law, people complained. Now, seatbelts are the norm.

Reply
William Allbritain
1
William Allbritain

The science doesn't support universal mask wearing as an effective way to slow the virus down, and the virus is not dangerous for the vast majority of Missourians, so the steps we are willing to take to protect ourselves should be left up to us to decide.

Reply
Steve D
0
Steve D

Risk mitigation is a personal choice. Smoking, seatbelts, obesity are individual decisions. While they have some impact in local societies, ultimately the individual controls the situation

Reply
Natalie Allbritain
0
Natalie Allbritain

People getting the virus are wearing masks. Not scientifically proven. Testing positive does not mean you have the virus, just exposed.

Reply

Yes, I agree.

5

No, I disagree.

38

Yes, I agree.

5 Comments
Calvin Hamman
0
Calvin Hamman

because if a 16 year old can enroll into the army, they should at least be able to vote.

Reply
Don Elsom
0
Don Elsom

lots of issues being debated today affect 16 YO for years to come. Most are more informed than people my age.

Reply
Darlene Knox
0
Darlene Knox

Only if we bring back civics classes so they understand what they are voting for.

Reply
Mark Clement
0
Mark Clement

kids today are a lot smarter than we were at 16. give 'em a chance to prove themselves.

Reply

No, I disagree.

37 Comments
Joseph Proulx
1
Joseph Proulx

Absolutely not! The voting age should be moved back to 21

Reply
John Driscoll
1
John Driscoll

There is a strong case for restoring the voting age to 21 with an exception for individuals serving with the military or who have been honorably discharge

Reply
Amy Schrader
1
Amy Schrader

Liberals have socialist agenda indoctrinating our kids in the school system. They still live under parents roof, wet behind the ears, NO, NO, NO way they should be allowed to vote yet.

Reply
Kenneth Swipies
1
Kenneth Swipies

The age for most activities should be raised, not lowered. Children are still children.

Reply
Sadie Kittelson
1
Sadie Kittelson

18 was stupid and this insane.!!!!!!

Reply
Lynn Huntley
1
Lynn Huntley

They shouldn't even be allowed to drive. They are NOT mature enough.

Reply
Gramma Jean
0
Gramma Jean

NO! Children are not taught civics and are too immature. Two basic reasons. It was an idea brought out by politics, not common sense.

Reply
Kim Varner
0
Kim Varner

I have a 16 year old. He’s not competent enough to remember to brush his hair and teeth, put deodorant on, put clean clothes on after you shower. No thanks. Leave it to someone who is older.

Reply
Leslie Ann
0
Leslie Ann

Excuse me but... HELL NO... they are NOT all mature enough.

Reply
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

ARE YOU PEOPLE OUT OF YOUR MINDS?

Reply
Kathryn Kinney Evans
0
Kathryn Kinney Evans

Some 16 year olds are mature enough to vote but I would say 90% are not. Voting is an important act and has to be considered carefully.

Reply
Robyn Ryel
0
Robyn Ryel

At 16 you are to influenced by your peers. At that age you are more concerned with what you will wear out Friday night.

Reply
Dilly Powell-Smith
0
Dilly Powell-Smith

Because 16 year olds are not mature enough to be making those kind of decisions.

Reply
Teresa Rodriguez
0
Teresa Rodriguez

Oregon leaders, in their infinite wisdom just moved the smoking age to 21, now want 21 to buy firearms, can't sign a contract til 18, nor live on their own. Now they want more voters, soooooo

Reply
Bradaigh Holt
0
Bradaigh Holt

Absolutely not. It has been scientifically proven that brains (reasoning centers) are not fully developed until age 25.

Reply
Bruce Sharp
0
Bruce Sharp

16 is much too young. Wait until they are out of the house and earning their own living. Love their energy and idealism, but needs to be tempered with experience and pragmatism.

Reply
F Hoskins
0
F Hoskins

They are not emotionally mature enough for serious choices, can be too reactionary

Reply
Anna Howe
0
Anna Howe

They don't know what life is about at 16. Still looking for boy/girl friends.

Reply
Chrissie Wise
0
Chrissie Wise

too young to many immature hormones

Reply
Breeauna Sagdal
0
Breeauna Sagdal

Tide pods, condom snorting and common core... I rest my case! Salem doesn't trust people to own a gun until 21, but voting on future policy is fine? Have you met today's teens?

Reply
Gladys Graybael
0
Gladys Graybael

They not mature or ready to vote, they still out here doing dumbass challenges like sniffing condoms, go missing for 2 days and eating tide pods.

Reply
Fred Farkle
0
Fred Farkle

You know, 15 is almost 16, why not them? Drivers license? 15 year olds can get a permit after taking the same test. While were at it, lower the drinking and marijuana ages to 15 also.

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Yeah because we all new everything at 16 at least we thought we did. Heck I think its should be raised to 25 that's when you finally figure out you don't know everything

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

Tide pods, condom snorting, ice challenge . . . Need I say more?

Reply
Greg and Karen Cross
0
Greg and Karen Cross

At 16 children are vulnerable to peer pressure as well as to people in authority persuading their decisions.

Reply
Kathy Todhunter
0
Kathy Todhunter

Kids at the age of 16 most likely still live at home with parents, they are not of legal age to make decisions and have not worked full time, paid taxes nor have they paid bills for their own support.

Reply
Bob Harlan
0
Bob Harlan

nope they shouldn't be given the right to vote, Legally they aren't responsible for their own lives yet, so why should they be given the privilege of controlling the lives of others.

Reply
Bob Vidourek
0
Bob Vidourek

The canals with water improve on scenic value. Piping would degrade this value.

Reply
Georgeanna Condon
0
Georgeanna Condon

16 year old minds are still developing and changing. No they are barely old enough to know who they are. If you allow them to vote, might as well let them drink, go to war and handle all other adult r

Reply
Fred Farkle
Fred Farkle

agreed. Wait, they're just kids, you can't expect them to drink and fight. They don't understand the consequences, EXACTLY!

Ka San
0
Ka San

Just like smoking and drinking age is 18, as should be the voting age. 16 yr olds are still too much under their parents' authority and would probably just vote however their parents tell them.

Reply
Ken Callison
0
Ken Callison

Before you have the privilege of voting, you should have some skin in the game. Like paying taxes. Being old enough to service in the armed forces, be old enough to be accountable for your actions.

Reply
Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

For heaven's sake! It's all part of the same lefty agenda, just like immigration. Knowing that young people tend to lean liberal it means more Dem votes. They couldn't care less about the kids rights.

Reply
Michael Wagner
0
Michael Wagner

They're still eating tide pods and burning themselves with erasers and want everything for free are you kidding me it should be raised to 21

Reply
Leah Kenville
0
Leah Kenville

Children don't understand what is going on in politics at 16.

Reply
Wanda Hancock
0
Wanda Hancock

Just because they pay taxes, etc. does not mean they know how to vote.....they don't pay attention and have no interest.

Reply
Dave Cupp
0
Dave Cupp

there brains are not fully developed

Reply
Pam Ferguson
0
Pam Ferguson

Kids at that age are to vote what parents or other people tell them not using their own mind &/or beliefs. Barely do at 18!!!!!

Reply

Yes

3

No

1

Yes

1 Comments
Harry D
2
Harry D

The Democratic Party is pushing hateful rhetoric, like calling Trump supporters "fascist" and "nazi" to drive people to violence and cause a color revolution. This must stop.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Fred
0
Fred

Trump has called Democrats “scum,” “vermin,” “animals” and “enemies of the people.” When U.S. Rep. Pelosi’s 82-year-old husband was bludgeoned with a hammer by a deranged man, Trump joked about it.

Reply
Harry D
Harry D

'This Is A Both Sides Issue,' Says Side That Shot President Trump, Assassinated Charlie Kirk, Tried To Assassinate Kavanaugh, Tried To Shoot Trump Again, Shot Steve Scalise, Firebombed Governor Shapiro, Tried To Shoot Trump A Third Time..." Babylon Bee - but true.

Max
Max

They are acting like that, yes.

About Missouri governor

Debates and polls on Missouri governor from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT