Government SquareOffs

Do you think trusted lanes will be beneficial when crossing the border?
29 0
Do you think trusted lanes will be beneficial when crossing the border?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Should the Senate Judiciary Committee confirm Todd Blanche as the permanent U.S. Attorney General?
56 1
Should the Senate Judiciary Committee confirm Todd Blanche as the permanent U.S. Attorney General?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
How would you rate the Trump administration's deal with Iran?
134 3
How would you rate the Trump administration's deal with Iran?
News-Press Now
Asked By
News-Press Now
Do you think more should be done to support the homeless?
97 2
Do you think more should be done to support the homeless?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Do you think President Trump's deal with Iran will be beneficial for the U.S.?
110 0
Do you think President Trump's deal with Iran will be beneficial for the U.S.?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Are you concerned Social Security checks could be smaller next year?
63 2
Are you concerned Social Security checks could be smaller next year?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Should stricter campaigning rules be enforced?
40 0
Should stricter campaigning rules be enforced?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Should taxpayer money go towards the White House ballroom?
138 5
Should taxpayer money go towards the White House ballroom?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Should city officials promote religious events, like the National Day of Prayer, at city meetings?
14 1
Should city officials promote religious events, like the National Day of Prayer, at city meetings?
Vox Populi
Asked By
Vox Populi
Are you in favor of Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos remaining in office?
60 0
Are you in favor of Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos remaining in office?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Are you in favor of Missouri's new congressional map?
101 2
Are you in favor of Missouri's new congressional map?
News-Press Now
Asked By
News-Press Now
Do you think trash fees will be beneficial for Imperial County?
37 0
Do you think trash fees will be beneficial for Imperial County?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Do you think the upcoming batch of UFO files released by the government will reveal anything?
53 0
Do you think the upcoming batch of UFO files released by the government will reveal anything?
News-Press Now
Asked By
News-Press Now
Do you think fuel prices will go down anytime soon?
96 1
Do you think fuel prices will go down anytime soon?
News-Press Now
Asked By
News-Press Now
Do you support a record $1.5 trillion budget for the military?
198 7
Do you support a record $1.5 trillion budget for the military?
KTVZ
Asked By
KTVZ

Yes

12

No

7

Yes

Lee Rabidoux
2
Lee Rabidoux

They were hired by the voters to do a job and they failed. Their obligation is to represent everyplace in their district and they demonstrated nothing but contempt for that obligation and oath.

Reply
Lee Rabidoux
2
Lee Rabidoux

They were hired by the voters to do a job and they failed. Their obligation is to represent everyplace in their district and they demonstrated nothing but contempt for that obligation and oath.

Reply
Duane Wyman
2
Duane Wyman

Foolish stunts, idiots.

Reply
Kele Sammons
2
Kele Sammons

Oregonians voted on this matter and these reps knew the consequences.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Measure 113 was clearly an effort by the majority to disenfranchise the minority. This needs to get before the US Supreme Court as quickly as possible. Clearly unconstitutional.

Lisa York
1
Lisa York

I'm pretty sure the rest of us would be terminated for 10 unexcused absences... your actions were absolutely cowardly... how about doing the job we're paying you to do...

Reply
Glenda McCarn
0
Glenda McCarn

Our vote should count for something

Reply
John Sutton
0
John Sutton

Because most of us voted for the bill to be passed for that reason. They could have pass way more bills that would have benefited all of us.

Reply
John Sutton
0
John Sutton

Because most of us voted for the bill to be passed for that reason. They could have pass way more bills that would have benefited all of us.

Reply
JP
0
JP

The rules are for you too, republitardicans

Reply
daniel tovar
0
daniel tovar

they went in knowing that it was a law and willfully did not go to work, just to slow the process they were hired to perform.

Reply

No

Rick Allen
1
Rick Allen

They did the right thing, keeping the left from passing more bad legislature! I mean look what they have done, defunding police, increased crime rates significantly, especially in Portland, decriminalizing hard drugs, they turned Portland into a a crime ridden, drug ridden slime pit. Vote Republican

Reply
Gabe West
1
Gabe West

Measure 113 was clearly an effort by the majority to disenfranchise the minority. This needs to get before the US Supreme Court as quickly as possible. Clearly unconstitutional. Where can I donate to the GOP to fight this?????

Reply
Stang1960
Stang1960

CB ... The 14th Amendment for voters rights. Not allowing voters to vote for who they want could be unconstitutional. We shall see :) Oh, Childishly insulting individual's for their opinions is a sign of weakness in ones argument, just saying :)

CB
CB

Lol, what's unconstitutional about it? Gabe, you are regurgitating the BS you hear on Fox News. You don't actually know what you're taking about. I hope it does go to the supreme court so when it's determined to be constitutional, other states follow course. The GOP is a dying, outdated breed.

Stang1960
0
Stang1960

Only Communist ban competition and people they disagree with. When they left the Capital it was standing up for their voters, they did their job.

Reply
Gerald Smith
0
Gerald Smith

Stupid "law" must be unconstitutional

Reply
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
0
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

If they're a candidate and win because people vote for them they should get the job!

Reply
CB
CB

They didn't show up to their job 10+ times. In the real world, you get fired for that, as should they. They are pathetic disappointments not worthy of their positions.

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

No one has commented yet

No

No one has commented yet

Yes

0

No

4

Yes

No one has commented yet

No

Duane Wyman
1
Duane Wyman

Poor decision as it will result in farmers/ranchers paying much more in taxes with their minimal population base. The potential money from the County will be minimal and insufficient to support their governing needs and expenses.

Reply
Yoleen Faerber
0
Yoleen Faerber

This seems to be one man's project. Are the residents forming their own fire district or even meeting as a community, things that unincorporated communities do? Why change the name to something so bland? Sounds like he wants to build a waterless subdivision.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Much more expenses for the ranchers, farmers. Very destructive to the land and wildlife. In time just another liberal city with crime and homeless.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

The residents will pay more in taxes

Reply

About Government

Debates and polls on Government from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT