Energy SquareOffs

Yes

0

No

3

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

3 Comments
Christopher Watson
2
Christopher Watson

Because most won't be able to buy one, besides Shade Tree mach. will still want to work on real cars!

Reply
Dawn Carter
1
Dawn Carter

No!!! I can barely afford rent and groceries let alone go buy a electric truck that can be equal to mine and what it can do. The government needs to stop doing for themselves and forcing their polices and rules onto Americans. Civil war baby is on its way!!

Reply
Max
0
Max

No, they have done enough damage already

Reply

Yes

5

No

6

Yes

3 Comments
Anita Grace Ward
1
Anita Grace Ward

I care about childrens future!

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Then why do you fall for all the lies?

fred raithel
1
fred raithel

Supporting the transition is not immediately profitable. Therefore, government has to provide the initial seed money. It's like the space program.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

It's not the government's job to make stupid investments using our money.

No

3 Comments
Randel Hearne
2
Randel Hearne

Just drives the price up on the product. Look at the price increase on the 2023 Ford Lightning Pro.

Reply
Adam
Adam

Why would you buy a Ford anyway?

Lisa Howard Glass
2
Lisa Howard Glass

If it's going to work, let it happen naturally. We cannot FORCE a transition to anything, especially with politicians getting kickbacks from their "green" donors. And a lot of these "green" energy sources aren't that reliable anyway.

Reply

Yes!

0

No!

9

Yes!

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No!

9 Comments
Gabe West
1
Gabe West

To much government control

Reply
Salli Mc
1
Salli Mc

Too much govt control. Let us beware and decide for ourselves.

Reply
Bob Majka
1
Bob Majka

No, after moving every 2-4 years, lived in 9 states and 3 of those states multiple times the last thing on your mind is the energy score. If in doubt and you have the option of waiting, ask for one.

Reply
k san
0
k san

Don't home inspections show you everything you need to know?

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

So tired of the Democrats socialist, Marxist control nonsense, this is America not a socialist country!

Reply
Gary Everett
0
Gary Everett

Another bureaucratic over reach to fit their agenda with no consideration for the consequences, cost, etc.

Reply
Neva Strong
0
Neva Strong

This extra cost will be more than just the cost of a score; the City of Bend will charge a filing fee with the City to track these scores and the ECC committee knows it won't make a difference with climate goals because owners aren't required to do any updates - YET.

Reply
Lester Friedman
0
Lester Friedman

Buyers can have one done, at their own expense, just like a home inspection, as part of their purchase if they want one. Why does the seller have to pay unless the city's purpose is to force sellers to spend money for improvements they will not benefit from? Let the party who will benefit pay.

Reply
Jon Krutsch
0
Jon Krutsch

Dumb to require it. When people are bidding on houses and paying $70k over asking, the energy score is the last thing they consider. It should be a voluntary, ask if you want it, basis.

Reply
Who to Follow
KTVZ

About Energy

Debates and polls on Energy from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT