.jpg?1762493919 "Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?")
She leans to far left with the radical side of the party, Omar, AOC, Jeffries etc. Sad for our country and the values it was founded on.
Reply
If you don't run reds, you don't have anything to worry about! Worst area I have EVER seen for folks running reds. There isn't even a hint of brake on a yellow, they're going through by gosh!!
Reply
Increased traffic in Bend has brought more traffic woes. I have personally seen drivers increase speed or run red lights to get through intersections at the last minute. These cameras are needed safety features
Reply
You don’t change behavior by getting a notice in the mail well after the event. Photo tickets do nothing but extort money for private companies and local government.
Reply
They don’t take into account circumstances that happen all the time. This is why cops don’t always give you a ticket when they see you do it. I do not believe taking the human element out of law enforcement is effective. I do not believe these cameras should be legal.
Reply
More Government control. Give us statistics where it saved lives. Charging it's already extremely highly taxed citizens is ridiculous. It issues the owner of the car the citation who may not even be driving. Insurance goes up or is canceled causing low income drivers to drive without insurance.
Reply
At reed mkt and 3rd its already common to take 3 cycles of light changes to make it through. This will make it so people feel have to go slower contributing to the delay that already exists because of poorly planned infrastructure
Reply
All it is going to do overall, is produce more revenue and cause insurance rates of individuals to go up. It takes the real time needed judgment out of the equation by an officer. Clearly, infractions happen over small nuances or when in the dilemma zone. Put a big sign up would have the same effect
Reply
Relying on technology to do the job of officers is not efficient reason for 2.3 million dollar project ,especially. When we just put more officers on the ground the last year.What was the need for more officers?.
Reply
Because it boost the pockets of the city, and takes from the people. It will not reduce car accidents that much, it's only for revenue for the politicians. And it's been proven that they don't work that great. This is just another Ponzi scheme to collect money from the public to line there pockets.
Reply.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Debates and polls on Donald trump from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2026 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Asked by
