.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
.png?1767749200 "Should the city prioritize funding for youth arts programs over increasing the police budget?")
These businesses that agree could still turn their video over to police so what's the big deal.
Reply
I agree, but the government putting in their own cameras stinks of a Police State. The government could then pick and choose who they want to prosecute. Currently they prosecute, sentence, and then parole, all in one operation. That doesn't curb crime either.
Policy doesn't define crime, that's the job of legislature. Businesses set up what level of agreeance they have to law enforcement accessing cameras through FUSUS. Trust comes from the community side as well; stop believing the "police are bogeyman all the time" fairytale.
Reply
No because if they accepted the Fusus video system, businesses that aren't for it could choose to opt out of the program.
Reply
The businesses that are for the Fusus video system would not have to worry if the accepted the Fusus video system
Second degree murder or any form of murder underlining a kill umongst a victim deserves a life sentence if not, at least 40 years of imprisonment. More specifically a kill for a kill. So tragic.
Reply
Debates and polls on Crime from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2026 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Asked by
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Asked by