Is Batman and Robin really the better Schumacher Batman movie?

Is Batman and Robin really the better Schumacher Batman movie?

Ridiculous. It's Batman Forever.

12

Yep, at least it knows how stupid it is.

4

Ridiculous. It's Batman Forever.

12 Comments
Robert Wild
2
Robert Wild

Batman and Robin might be the more tonally consistent film of the two, but the best scenes in Batman and Robin are never as good as the best scenes in Batman Forever in my opinion. I also think Batman Forever just tells a better Batman story overall.

Reply
Chewbacca's Lover
2
Chewbacca's Lover

Batman Forever is more balanced and less awkward, but both are better stories than Batman Returns and actually about Batman.

Reply
Liam Donaghy
1
Liam Donaghy

Batman Forever is obviously the better film because, for all its faults, it's at least trying to be about Batman's character. Batman & Robin is nothing but a feature-length toy commercial. B&R even steals most of its plot from Forever.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

No way, "Batman Forever" is definitely the better movie of the 2! This is not to say I even dislike "Batman & Robin," as I see it as a harmless flick. However, "Forever" places Batman in the center of the story, executes a well-done Robin origin, and offers up a great Riddler! "Forever" is a blast!

Reply
VideoGameSecrets
0
VideoGameSecrets

I don’t think I have to explain anything for this. Batman and Robin is, at least I think, the worst Batman movie. It’s stupid, doesn’t really have a plot, and Batman Forever just is a better movie overall.

Reply
Shaun Blake
0
Shaun Blake

Because Baan Forever is actually trying trying be a movie about Bruce Wayne's psychology. The first movie to attempt this. Sure Begins would do it better but no other attempt was made before this. Also the tone, costumes and style are so much better. B&R is just a childish rehash

Reply
NICOLAS GARCIA
0
NICOLAS GARCIA

The one thing I can appreciate about Forever is the decent attempt and mostly successful character study of Bruce. It's actually the first film before Begins where Bruce is the protagonist. Kilmers performance is underrated too. That's the one thing that makes it better for me.

Reply
Tomislav Kralj
0
Tomislav Kralj

While I can enjoy B&R for the reason of it knowing how stupid it is, Forever though has genuinely well done ideas, concepts, set pieces, with it feeling like an early 70s Batman comic book

Reply
Justin Hayes
0
Justin Hayes

You’re a little early for April Fools ya know

Reply
Newt
0
Newt

It's just a better written and acted movie hands down. People want to give Batman and Robin too much because it's admittedly received far too much vitriol, but that should lead to us proclaiming such a poor film good (or even decent - this one is quite bad).

Reply
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

Wha??? Who is saying that?

Reply

Yep, at least it knows how stupid it is.

4 Comments
Spencer Nielsen
0
Spencer Nielsen

At least Batman & Robin doesn’t have the crushing weight of failed ambition on it. I feel like at some point (very early on in its writing process) there was a good version of Batman Forever. As it exists, Batman Forever is more frustrating to me than the completely integrity-free Batman & Robin.

Reply
Adam Stewart
0
Adam Stewart

Not because it's stupid. I find this movie to have a beautiful Bruce/Alfred relationship, a solid arc for Bruce in him having to trust others for help, let go of trying to control things. I may think BF technically a better movie, but this has a stronger Bruce and Alfred elements.

Reply
Nick hughes
0
Nick hughes

If we assume Arnie and Jim Carey cancel each other out. Uma Thurman is much better in her role than Tommie Lee Jones and for that reason I’d say Batman and Robin is more watchable

Reply
Conner Nielsen
0
Conner Nielsen

Batman & Robin may follow the structure laid by Forever (which was itself following Returns’ absent structure), but Schumacher’s second Bat-flick is the only 90’s Batman sequel that has an identifiable central plot.

Reply
Which mantle, which is usually one person, works better as a legacy character, i.e. Green Lantern?

Which mantle, which is usually one person, works better as a legacy character, i.e. Green Lantern?

Batman

1

Spider-Man

3

Batman

1 Comment
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

Definitely Batman! I think this is because fans are used to Batman being more malleable, as Kane and Finger's Batman was a pretty basic, archetypal character that had an awesome motif. As such, the only real qualifiers are being someone who suffered a crime-related tragedy and stands against crime.

Reply

Spider-Man

3 Comments
Alex007
1
Alex007

The idea that anybody could be Spider-Man is a quintessential characteristic of the core of the character, you can be rich, poor, black or white and still be Spider-Man, even Stan said that's why he wears a full face mask, so it naturally follows that he is the best legacy heroes ever created.

Reply
jaredd
0
jaredd

I feel like the point of Spider-Man is that anybody can be Spider-Man. Miles and Peter are different characters with their own upbringings. It’s not the same for Batman. Bruce Wayne IS Batman. Only Bruce can really understand what it means to be Batman on a more intimate, personal level in my eyes.

Reply
Gregor Tolyns
0
Gregor Tolyns

Honestly I believe that Miles is the best example and most successful example of a legacy character ever, in just a little over a decade he has been in animated TV shows, animated movies, and video games, and now a sizeable part of the fandom considers him THE Spider-Man.

Reply
Would you rather see Bane or Poison Ivy in a sequel to The Batman?

Would you rather see Bane or Poison Ivy in a sequel to The Batman?

Bane

1

Poison Ivy

1

Bane

1 Comment
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

So, I'd really be happy with either. However, Bane interests me more for this series, as they seemed to be hinting at him with that green substance Batman uses. As much as I really like Hardy's portrayal, we've yet to have a comic-accurate film version that has much time to shine and be his own man.

Reply

Poison Ivy

1 Comment
SpedeVesku
0
SpedeVesku

Bane would probably fit the tone/stylw of the universe better, but he has been done in live-action movies twice already.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT