Supremecourt SquareOffs
243
1
Do you agree with the Supreme Court striking down President Trump's tariffs?
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Asked By
13 On Your Side
106
1
Should the Supreme Court overturn Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
116
3
Should term limits and a code of conduct be implemented for the Supreme Court?
Asked By
News-Press Now
73
1
Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision to preserve access to mifepristone?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
133
0
Should Supreme Court Justice Alito recuse himself in cases involving Trump and Jan. 6 rioters?
Asked By
News-Press Now
168
10
Should the government communicate with social media companies about content?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
91
4
Do you think SCOTUS will allow Trump to run again for office?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
74
0
Should the US change court rules after Justice Thomas accepted luxury gifts from a political donor?
Asked By
News-Press Now
85
0
Do you think SCOTUS will rule in favor of Title 42?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
240
2
Should Arizona be allowed to ban all abortions?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
246
1
Is abortion an issue that will affect how you vote in November?
Asked By
News-Press Now
124
1
Is it more important to you that a politician has integrity or gets things done?
Asked By
News-Press Now
158
1
Do you think more Arizonans will be going to Mexico for an abortion?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
18
2
Was the Supreme Court correct to overturn Roe vs Wade?
Asked By
heysocal
300
11
Which will be a bigger issue in the midterm elections?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
Asked by
YES
The mishandling of classified material is a federal offense.
The mishandling of classified material is a federal offense.
Show Less
Deanna Davis
A few months ago there were 15 boxes returned from there, they knew there was more. They asked for them, he did not comply. They were just taking back what he stole.
Reply
Michelle Renee Mears
There was a judge-approved warrant, his attorneys were present, and they were notified in advance after a subpoena was issued months before and ignored. It was not a raid, no one broke down any doors, and there were clearly urgent reasons to move forward even if they cannot be disclosed.
Reply
The Whittakers
Everyone should be accountable for their actions. Trump appointed FBI head and judges authorized the search. Previous formal requests had been ignored.
ReplyNO
YES
She took a stand, despite the political consequences.
She took a stand, despite the political consequences.
Show Less
The Whittakers
She is standing up for the United States Constitution in a nonpartisan manner in spite of personal attacks. She recognizes the very future of our country is uncertain in the current divisiveness.
Reply
Patricia Bond
She admits to the criminality of #45 and is fighting to turn her party away from #45's destructiveness.
ReplyNO
I don't agree with her vocal stance on the Jan. 6 commission.
I don't agree with her vocal stance on the Jan. 6 commission.
Show Less
Carol Martin
I don't agree with the whole January 6th committee. It's a waste if time and taxpayers monies. This has been going on way too long. It is so biased as to be putrid.
Reply
Trending
Who to Follow
About Supremecourt
Debates and polls on Supremecourt from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
Become a Partner
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Transparency should always be a goal, especially in a high profile situation, where the public has lots of questions.
ReplyThe people should decide if the DOJ is corrupt for themselves.
Reply