Scotus SquareOffs
58
1
Do you agree with SCOTUS' ruling saying Louisiana's redistricting map as unconstitutional?
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Asked By
13 On Your Side
208
3
Do you think the Supreme Court will overturn same sex marriage?
Asked By
KESQ News Channel 3
159
0
Was SCOTUS right to limit federal powers for nationwide injunctions on executive orders?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
291
3
Should states have the authority to block Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
143
1
Do you agree with SCOTUS upholding a law to restrict gender-affirming care for trans minors?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
139
2
Do you agree with the Supreme Court's ruling on Trump's immunity claims?
Asked By
News-Press Now
131
1
Do you agree with SCOTUS's ruling in the January 6 case?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
292
6
Should sleeping on public land be a guaranteed right?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
113
0
Do you agree with SCOTUS' decision on the Trump ballot case?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
123
0
Are you in favor of SCOTUS' ruling on college affirmative action programs?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
5
0
Should the government be able to add more Supreme Court Justices to SCOTUS?
Asked By
Devon Jones
87
0
Should SCOTUS find in favor of Alston and allow greater financial benefits to college athletes?
Asked By
Devon Jones
1,554
43
Should the voting age be lowered to 16?
Asked By
KTVZ
224
4
Have you watched Trump's comments after the White House Correspondents' Dinner?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
273
4
Would You Support Stephen A. Smith For President?
Asked By
TMZ
Asked by
YES
She took a stand, despite the political consequences.
She took a stand, despite the political consequences.
Show Less
The Whittakers
She is standing up for the United States Constitution in a nonpartisan manner in spite of personal attacks. She recognizes the very future of our country is uncertain in the current divisiveness.
Reply
Patricia Bond
She admits to the criminality of #45 and is fighting to turn her party away from #45's destructiveness.
ReplyNO
I don't agree with her vocal stance on the Jan. 6 commission.
I don't agree with her vocal stance on the Jan. 6 commission.
Show Less
Carol Martin
I don't agree with the whole January 6th committee. It's a waste if time and taxpayers monies. This has been going on way too long. It is so biased as to be putrid.
Reply
Asked by
Yes
fred raithel
Supporting the transition is not immediately profitable. Therefore, government has to provide the initial seed money. It's like the space program.
ReplyNo
Randel Hearne
Just drives the price up on the product. Look at the price increase on the 2023 Ford Lightning Pro.
Reply
Lisa Howard Glass
If it's going to work, let it happen naturally. We cannot FORCE a transition to anything, especially with politicians getting kickbacks from their "green" donors. And a lot of these "green" energy sources aren't that reliable anyway.
Reply
Trending
Who to Follow
About Scotus
Debates and polls on Scotus from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
Become a Partner
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Indefensible for the former president to hold onto documents that are government property and contain sensitive national security information
ReplyA few months ago there were 15 boxes returned from there, they knew there was more. They asked for them, he did not comply. They were just taking back what he stole.
ReplyThere was a judge-approved warrant, his attorneys were present, and they were notified in advance after a subpoena was issued months before and ignored. It was not a raid, no one broke down any doors, and there were clearly urgent reasons to move forward even if they cannot be disclosed.
ReplyEveryone should be accountable for their actions. Trump appointed FBI head and judges authorized the search. Previous formal requests had been ignored.
Reply