.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
We don't need a national bureaucracy. Each conference can and should make their own decisions.
Reply
I have not heard of one infection that has turned out bad for any players. Coaches either for that matter.
Reply
why wouldn't 100% play this year? To the ages of the vast majority there, they are all in the range where it actually would be a good thing to get it and get over it so that they can't infect others.
Reply
I think the majority will play some games. But, how many games? Some will play 1-3 and then be plagued by positives. Others may get 8-10 games in.
Reply
Colleges need that money. Further, they don't want to kids to realize they can just stay at home and get online degrees for a fraction of the price if there is no college experience with it.
Reply
Like as in 100%. This plandemic is much over-hyped and college football is much to big too keep down. It's more than football, it's about money.
Reply
Power five football teams have to play to pay for other sports bills besides men's basketball. So Fauci and the other Liberals will be forced to let them play so the women's teams can play this year.
Reply
The math of epidemiology speaks for itself. Even if college FB starts it won't finish. GBR.
Reply
Debates and polls on Ncaa from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Asked by
Asked by
But they have to be honest, with integrity and transparency (unlike we have now).
ReplyKeeps all conferences on a even field.
Reply