.png?1650640918 "Joshua Russo")
.png?1646568624 "Hayley Watcher")
Erik Killmonger stood for a worthy cause, he just didn’t go about everything the right way. Thanos on the other hand, wiped out half the universe because the ratio of resources to population didn’t bode well instead of using the infinity stones to double resources. Method was madness like the plan.
Reply
His story arch is great. He didn't do this because of his warped views like Thanos. He looked at what was done to the people that looked like him and wanted to make their lives better with the resources of his home nation by any means necessary.
Reply
Well here’s the thing, In one hand we got Kilomonger, he is a villain and a perfect match for the black panther and almost killed him too, on the other hand we got Thanos, the big dude that wants to erase 50% of the population and successfully did it. Sooo like… u tell me who the better villain is.
Reply
He had a plan that was full proof, won over 14 million times, and he won a battle against the avengers. If not for the time travel, he would have stayed the victor.
Reply
I mean the dude defeated the Avengers and killed half of the universe. 'Nuff said lol
Reply
He was much harder to beat and had a lot more power but in my opinion he’s the stronger one but for character kill monger is better
Reply
He has all the infinity stones he could kill him before he even touches him, Very simple question with a very simple answer
Reply
Debates and polls on Mcu from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Asked by
Asked by
Asked by
