#politics SquareOffs
165
0
Do you think the judge will rule in favor of Senator Kelly's lawsuit?
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Asked By
13 On Your Side
55
0
Are you worried about a potential U.S./Iran conflict?
Asked By
News-Press Now
56
0
Are you surprised by the findings from the latest Epstein files release?
Asked By
News-Press Now
372
2
Do you approve of Democrats threatening to defund the DHS?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
191
0
Should the government garnish wages for those who default on student loans?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
222
7
Are You In Favor of U.S. Involvement in Venezuela?
Asked By
NewsChannel312
357
0
Do you think it was right for the U.S. to capture Nicolas Maduro?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
91
3
Do you agree with the government's involvement in Venezuela?
Asked By
News-Press Now
256
1
Do you agree with President Trump's speech from last night?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
228
0
Do you think President Trump is right to order a blockade of oil tankers in Venezuela?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
74
1
Are you in favor of the RAPID Act?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
2,535
9
Do you think Pride celebration unifies or creates division?
Asked By
KESQ News Channel 3
205
0
Do you think it was right for the U.S. to seize a Venezuela oil tanker?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
351
10
Are You In Favor Of Oil Drilling?
Asked By
NewsChannel312
129
0
Do you agree with President Trump pardoning the former president of Honduras?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Asked by
YES
She took a stand, despite the political consequences.
She took a stand, despite the political consequences.
Show Less
The Whittakers
She is standing up for the United States Constitution in a nonpartisan manner in spite of personal attacks. She recognizes the very future of our country is uncertain in the current divisiveness.
Reply
Patricia Bond
She admits to the criminality of #45 and is fighting to turn her party away from #45's destructiveness.
ReplyNO
I don't agree with her vocal stance on the Jan. 6 commission.
I don't agree with her vocal stance on the Jan. 6 commission.
Show Less
Carol Martin
I don't agree with the whole January 6th committee. It's a waste if time and taxpayers monies. This has been going on way too long. It is so biased as to be putrid.
Reply
Asked by
Yes
fred raithel
Supporting the transition is not immediately profitable. Therefore, government has to provide the initial seed money. It's like the space program.
ReplyNo
Randel Hearne
Just drives the price up on the product. Look at the price increase on the 2023 Ford Lightning Pro.
Reply
Lisa Howard Glass
If it's going to work, let it happen naturally. We cannot FORCE a transition to anything, especially with politicians getting kickbacks from their "green" donors. And a lot of these "green" energy sources aren't that reliable anyway.
Reply
Trending
Who to Follow
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
About #politics
Debates and polls on #politics from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
Become a Partner
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Indefensible for the former president to hold onto documents that are government property and contain sensitive national security information
ReplyA few months ago there were 15 boxes returned from there, they knew there was more. They asked for them, he did not comply. They were just taking back what he stole.
ReplyThere was a judge-approved warrant, his attorneys were present, and they were notified in advance after a subpoena was issued months before and ignored. It was not a raid, no one broke down any doors, and there were clearly urgent reasons to move forward even if they cannot be disclosed.
ReplyEveryone should be accountable for their actions. Trump appointed FBI head and judges authorized the search. Previous formal requests had been ignored.
Reply