Central Oregon's News Leader - KTVZ NewsChannel 21, Bend, Oregon
Should there be a tougher minimum sentence for assault with life-changing injury?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
523 Votes

Should there be a tougher minimum sentence for assault with life-changing injury?

Yes

10

No

0

Yes

10 Comments
Marcus Ainsworth
2
Marcus Ainsworth

only in a state like Oregon would democrats vote to NOT penalize people that brutally beat people to the degree they have life altering injuries. How is this even real. This should be voted on with 100% support. The question you need to ask is why?

Reply
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
2
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

I vote for tougher penalties on crime altogether. Especially violent crime towards children. Anyone who harms a child like Ezra should never see the light of day again. Stop this soft on crime BS. DA's and judges should be permanently removed from office.

Reply
Lisa York
2
Lisa York

Absolutely!!!...bullet to the head would work just fine...

Reply
Deb Kizer Dyck
1
Deb Kizer Dyck

Absolutely, there needs to be accountability for one's actions.

Reply
Judy Ostrom
0
Judy Ostrom

Oregon is far too soft on crime in general, the courts need to step it up and do their job, one should not have a dozen parole/probation violations before they just simply get locked up for a spell, this should have happened the first violation!!

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

Yes definitely, that poor child's life has been terribly altered! We need much tougher serious crime punishments, the soft on crime left proves it is deeply hurting America. Dangerous criminal walking the streets and hurting more people is seriously unbelievable, the D A ,s should be charged!

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Not only for this but all criminals should be held accountable and drugs should be recriminalized, OR Democrtatics are way to soft on crime! ,

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Of course, what is it now?

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

20 years in not enough

No

0 Comments
No one has commented yet
Do you think Medicare advantage is problematic to health systems?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
223 Votes

Do you think Medicare advantage is problematic to health systems?

Yes

1

No

2

Yes

1 Comment
Shelly Young
0
Shelly Young

Medicare Advantage is not Medicare. They are private plans run by corporations for the purpose of extracting as much money out of Medicar beneficiaries and the government as possible. It is private insurance and a Republican plan to destroy actual Medicare. It costs taxpayers a lot more than actual

Reply

No

2 Comments
Terry Whitted
3
Terry Whitted

No. St. CHARLES is problematic to seniors' health.

Reply
Sussie Due
Sussie Due

THATS for sure! I was told years ago that a monopoly is illegal in the USA but apparently St Charles found its way around that. They own every single hospital and most of the clinics here.

Have you made an effort to reduce solo car trips?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
247 Votes

Have you made an effort to reduce solo car trips?

Yes

4

No

4

Yes

4 Comments
Kevin Roll
0
Kevin Roll

Always trying to reduce driving for saving $ and polluting.

Reply
Kevin Roll
0
Kevin Roll

Always trying to reduce driving for saving $ and polluting.

Reply

No

4 Comments
David Kline
1
David Kline

Because I'm stupid and lazy.

Reply
Kevin Roll
Kevin Roll

That's hilarious but love the honesty 😁

Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

No I live out in the country and would never do that anyway!

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Climate change exists but there is no emergency

Reply
SunnySunshinestein
SunnySunshinestein

Glad to see you acknowledge that climate change exists.

Kevin Roll
Kevin Roll

Not yet but everything we do today contributes to the issue nonetheless... Always better to be ahead of the game and do what's best no matter what.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT