Ktvz SquareOffs

Yes

1

No

12

Yes

1 Comment
Robert Northrup
0
Robert Northrup

Rents need to keep up with the housing market or single family home rentals will disappear.

Reply

No

11 Comments
Kelli Candella
1
Kelli Candella

Government controlling the income/investment of private citizens. So dumb

Reply
Brad Livsey
1
Brad Livsey

Is a one child cap allowance reasonable for a family in Oregon? Don't laugh.......this is how the ball starts to bounce, don't you know!!

Reply
Sam Ackerman
1
Sam Ackerman

Business people do not invest in business's that have price controls on them.

Reply
Derek C Reed
Derek C Reed

Good, let the businesses go elsewhere.

Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

Just one more notch in the socialist agenda. They want to control everything and get rid of the free market.

Reply
k san
0
k san

No news we have an affordable housing problem in Bend, so why would anyone think this high of a cap is right??

Reply
GT Thomas
0
GT Thomas

There are two problems. First liberals in the legislature think they (government) should run eveything and the laws consequences is rents will go higher as owners take places off the market.

Reply
John Philo
0
John Philo

The effect of the "unintended consequences" will weigh heavy on this sloppy legislation. End result will be higher rents and fewer rentals available. Good job...NOT!

Reply
Valerie Rhodes Kifer
0
Valerie Rhodes Kifer

9.9% is an outrageous increase for most working families. If the rent is 2000 per month, 9.9% is 198 per month. And if it's another 9.9 next year that would be 217 per month.

Reply
Derek C Reed
0
Derek C Reed

TOO MUCH! almost 9.9% annually is allowing a maximum of 99% every ten years

Reply
Justin Gottlieb
0
Justin Gottlieb

That is a Hell of an Interest Rate underwritten by folks living paycheck to paycheck: $99 per $1000 in monthly rent. How does that factor with other reasonable and neccessary expenses? Total not part!

Reply

Yes

3

No

4

Yes

3 Comments
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

A lot of revenue and deals have been made

Reply
William Schwabe
0
William Schwabe

Because the president wants to put America first and make it as prosperous as it once was. #MAGA

Reply
Steven Miles
0
Steven Miles

Exec branch has the responsibility to manage the economy with other countries, congress can’t even produce an annual budget - look at this democrat shutdown, they want to spend another 1.5T on healthcare subsidies- sorry, we are in the hole $35T, wake up America.

Reply

No

4 Comments
Tom Pummer
1
Tom Pummer

Trump’s tariffs violate the constitution. Congress holds the nations purse strings. I can’t believe we hardly heard a peep from members of Congress on his actions. Spineless

Reply
Rick Martinson
1
Rick Martinson

Absolutely not. The Constitution gives that authority to Congress, NOT the executive branch of the government. Trump’s actions are absolutely illegal and unconstitutional. But he doesn’t care, and has been giving Congress and the American People the finger for the past 10 months.

Reply
Mike Moreno
1
Mike Moreno

Memo to trump...there is a document in this country called the Constitution. Read it, learn it, live it.

Reply
k san
0
k san

Congress has the power of the purse, if only they would use it. but they're too scared of being primaried by him. Of course, he should not have 1/3 of the powers he has adopted, whether constitutional or not. He's an abomination!!

Reply

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

About Ktvz

Debates and polls on Ktvz from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT