Because he committed to it. Could be another gender/color decision versus merit. Maybe he learned his lesson with Kamala. She was a gender and color decision without merit. Will support any gender and color WITH merit.
Especially qualified black women justices have never been considered. The ABA will confirm her qualifications along with her experience and judicial record. He committed to appointment of such a candidate. Shouldn't be objectionable.
Because he said yesterday and today it will be the first black woman on the Supreme Court. He said the same thing when he picked Kamala for VP. But the question is will it be a transgender woman?
His only requirements is that it will be a woman of color. Look how the woman of color he chose for VP turned out.
ReplyBecause he committed to it. Could be another gender/color decision versus merit. Maybe he learned his lesson with Kamala. She was a gender and color decision without merit. Will support any gender and color WITH merit.
ReplyEspecially qualified black women justices have never been considered. The ABA will confirm her qualifications along with her experience and judicial record. He committed to appointment of such a candidate. Shouldn't be objectionable.
ReplyBecause he said yesterday and today it will be the first black woman on the Supreme Court. He said the same thing when he picked Kamala for VP. But the question is will it be a transgender woman?
Reply