KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Would you support a larger federal stimulus check?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,086 Votes

Would you support a larger federal stimulus check?

Yes, $600 is too small

14

No, $2,000 is too large

6

Yes, $600 is too small

11 Comments
Rick Allen
2
Rick Allen

$ 600.00 is a joke, but even $2,000 is not the answer, the correct answer is to open up this country, restaurants and all and let Americans take care of themselves, handouts are not the answer! Hurting the economy with shutdowns is absurd and increasing the national deficit is certainly NOT right!

Reply
Judy Ostrom-Dixon
Judy Ostrom-Dixon

so...people dying is ok and all good with you?? Hopefully only your family... smfh!

Teresa Parsons
2
Teresa Parsons

$2,000 could potentially mean the difference from being homeless or not., but $600 will Not pay anyones rent or house payment.

Reply
Brad Livsey
1
Brad Livsey

U WANT TO SEE SOMETHING OFF BALANCE IN THE WORLD?? .....Search COVID-19 stimulus payments in other world countries......After seeing their benefits ask yourself if that bag of peanuts we're being tossed is a fair allowance!.....You'll think NOT, 4 SURE!

Reply
tim collins
1
tim collins

$4,000.00 for every one that makes under 40,000.00. Give it to people that actually need it! I think these billionaires need to be capped and the rest given back.

Reply
tim collins
tim collins

I still like a income flat tax the same for every person. No deductions and no taxes back.

Nick Schutte
1
Nick Schutte

These corrupt career politicians need to think about the American people first. Why send billions of dollars overseas when it’s a stimulus to help the the American people?if you call it a covid relief bill for the American people and say it’s to help us but send money overseas it’sgoing back to them

Reply
Amber Chan
1
Amber Chan

The people that need it are hurting badly and $600 is a slap in the face. $2000 comes closer to covering anything significant.

Reply
DeBacker Melis
DeBacker Melis

Better then nothing...

Mary Gemba
1
Mary Gemba

$2,000 might actually make a difference in people's lives; $600 doesn't cut it at all.

Reply
Susan Decker
DeBacker Melis
DeBacker Melis

Better then nothing.

Pam W
0
Pam W

For those that truly need it. Not for people that are still able to work and earn a living. And absolutely NOT for illegal immigrants EVER!!

Reply
Amber Miller
0
Amber Miller

Because even though the 600$ stimulus was approved I feel that the other amount would be easier and better cause for the businesses, and the American people.

Reply

No, $2,000 is too large

4 Comments
Kimmy Wasatch
5
Kimmy Wasatch

Better to get back to work, stop handouts

Reply
Robert Northrup
3
Robert Northrup

I think we should give everyone $10,000. I am 78 I won't need to pay it back. lol. Most of the money borrowed is going to foreign countries. Young people that vote democrat have no idea that they are destroying their future.

Reply
Christena
0
Christena

inflation? There will be consequences to all this. I really hope those in need are able to use it well but it will still come at a cost.

Reply
Richard Dillard
0
Richard Dillard

No! what I would support is having businesses who are forced to close submit last years P&L to the government and get that money, they could pay their employee's who could pay their bills. Of course there is more to it but I do not have room to go in to it.

Reply
Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
324 Votes

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'

Yes

3

No

4

Yes

3 Comments
Kristi Murdock
1
Kristi Murdock

Even a friendly dog with excellent recall can cause real problems for the owner walking their reactive dog on leash; a dog running free is highly exciting to other dogs; it's not fair for the owner of the reactive dog to have to deal with that overstimulation in a "leash only" area.

Reply
robert weber
robert weber

I recently I commented that it is not fair. But your comment makes me feel incorrect. I have had a reactive dog before and I feel that your comment is valid.

Deborah Albright
0
Deborah Albright

BECAUSE most dog owners that do this have zero respect for others or property.. NEVER pick up poop and feel entitled

Reply
Nic Secor
0
Nic Secor

There are leash laws for good reason. On a side note Bend Parks and Recreation need to put up signs at dog parks reminding owners that they are liable for damages their dogs cause to other dogs or humans under Oregon law. Bend PD treat dog parks like they are outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply

No

3 Comments
Amanda Jones
1
Amanda Jones

A bad dog owner is someone who is not able to care of the animal or mistreats the animal. The person is just not considerate of others and will break the law for whatever reason they may have. *if you have an aggressive dog it is the OWNERS responsibility to keep the dog under control anywhere

Reply
Payton Dixson
1
Payton Dixson

There are many factors, if your dog has great recall and obeys to stay in a heal being off leash is fine as the dog is still in verbal control. Dogs that do not listen should not be off leash.

Reply
robert weber
0
robert weber

Maybe there pet is trusted and not reactive. Why does a none relative happy pet need to be restricted?

Reply
Will you be attending the Burgerville grand opening?

Will you be attending the Burgerville grand opening?

Yes

0

No

1

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

1 Comment
Amanda Jones
0
Amanda Jones

BV is not a good quality restaurant for the cost. Have never liked them and always like Del Taco.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT