KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should there be a tougher minimum sentence for assault with life-changing injury?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
527 Votes

Should there be a tougher minimum sentence for assault with life-changing injury?

Yes

10

No

0

Yes

8 Comments
Marcus Ainsworth
2
Marcus Ainsworth

only in a state like Oregon would democrats vote to NOT penalize people that brutally beat people to the degree they have life altering injuries. How is this even real. This should be voted on with 100% support. The question you need to ask is why?

Reply
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
2
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

I vote for tougher penalties on crime altogether. Especially violent crime towards children. Anyone who harms a child like Ezra should never see the light of day again. Stop this soft on crime BS. DA's and judges should be permanently removed from office.

Reply
Lisa York
2
Lisa York

Absolutely!!!...bullet to the head would work just fine...

Reply
Deb Kizer Dyck
1
Deb Kizer Dyck

Absolutely, there needs to be accountability for one's actions.

Reply
Judy Ostrom
0
Judy Ostrom

Oregon is far too soft on crime in general, the courts need to step it up and do their job, one should not have a dozen parole/probation violations before they just simply get locked up for a spell, this should have happened the first violation!!

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

Yes definitely, that poor child's life has been terribly altered! We need much tougher serious crime punishments, the soft on crime left proves it is deeply hurting America. Dangerous criminal walking the streets and hurting more people is seriously unbelievable, the D A ,s should be charged!

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Not only for this but all criminals should be held accountable and drugs should be recriminalized, OR Democrtatics are way to soft on crime! ,

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Of course, what is it now?

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

20 years in not enough

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
With these federal funding cuts are you worried about the effects to our national parks?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
257 Votes

With these federal funding cuts are you worried about the effects to our national parks?

Yes

0

No

1

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

1 Comment
Chris Herndon
1
Chris Herndon

I think if managed properly by the Super. The budgets are workable with fewer employees multi tasking and wearing more than one hat!Any buisness can benefit with improved efficiency!!

Reply
Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
701 Votes

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'

Yes

6

No

4

Yes

6 Comments
Kristi Murdock
1
Kristi Murdock

Even a friendly dog with excellent recall can cause real problems for the owner walking their reactive dog on leash; a dog running free is highly exciting to other dogs; it's not fair for the owner of the reactive dog to have to deal with that overstimulation in a "leash only" area.

Reply
robert weber
robert weber

I recently I commented that it is not fair. But your comment makes me feel incorrect. I have had a reactive dog before and I feel that your comment is valid.

Kati Magana
0
Kati Magana

If it is a law and you break it regardless of what it refers to that is breaking the law- which by definition is criminal. If you put your pet in a situation that is unsafe that is your responsibility and ergo you are a bad pet owner. Pets are like our kids, it's our job to keep them safe.

Reply
Kim Ritchie
0
Kim Ritchie

yes because they are putting their dog as well as people with leashed pets at risk. Not all dogs like other dogs and not all people are comfortable with strange dogs running up to them.

Reply
Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

There are laws and rules for a reason. No one should think that laws and rules don't apply to them. If they want their dog off leash then go out in the woods where no one else is or to a fenced dog park.

Reply
Deborah Albright
0
Deborah Albright

BECAUSE most dog owners that do this have zero respect for others or property.. NEVER pick up poop and feel entitled

Reply
Nic Secor
0
Nic Secor

There are leash laws for good reason. On a side note Bend Parks and Recreation need to put up signs at dog parks reminding owners that they are liable for damages their dogs cause to other dogs or humans under Oregon law. Bend PD treat dog parks like they are outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply

No

3 Comments
Amanda Jones
1
Amanda Jones

A bad dog owner is someone who is not able to care of the animal or mistreats the animal. The person is just not considerate of others and will break the law for whatever reason they may have. *if you have an aggressive dog it is the OWNERS responsibility to keep the dog under control anywhere

Reply
Payton Dixson
1
Payton Dixson

There are many factors, if your dog has great recall and obeys to stay in a heal being off leash is fine as the dog is still in verbal control. Dogs that do not listen should not be off leash.

Reply
robert weber
0
robert weber

Maybe there pet is trusted and not reactive. Why does a none relative happy pet need to be restricted?

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT