Yes, it's our safety
No, not fundamental
A ruling to make protection from climate change would set a precedent that bleeds into several legal gray areas. I don't think it's 'fundamental', per se. Also, if we're causing...
Show More
A ruling to make protection from climate change would set a precedent that bleeds into several legal gray areas. I don't think it's 'fundamental', per se. Also, if we're causing climate change, why should it be our right to protect ourselves from...ourselves?
Show Less
4
Comments
Dave Voiles
The so called "science" is not settled. These are the same people whose weather models have proven to be wrong. Remember we went from global warming to climate change. Bill Nye the fake science guy.
Reply
Sam Ackerman
The same people that are scared about "climate change" are helping create the problem. They are having kids. More people = more climate change.
Reply
there are to many humans on earth and we need to stop reproducing so that more trees can grow and future generations can have enough oxygen to breath . my name is charles webster baer of bend or .
ReplyIT IS AND EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO HUMANITY
ReplyNo brainer, to me. but then I've always been environmentally conscious.
ReplyIf cigarette smoke is so deadly, then pollutants from everything else is probably more dangerous. Lets keep our whole environment CLEAN.
ReplyI suffer from lung ailments. our lives are at stake if we don't address climate issues. Prescribed burns and summer fires are harmful to all. There are ways to deal with them, decreasing their impact
Reply