The non-unanimous jury was completely unconstitutional and Oregon fought hard to keep it, being the last state in the country to get rid of what was well known as a Jim Crow law. And yet Oregon continues to do things that are unconstitutional, such as not provide enough public defenders.
the courts have no problem sending someone to prison for life with a simple majority, but 11-1 jury? Unconstitutional!
P.S. He’s the obviously innocent nephew of Stephen Avery from Making A Murderer.
Because there is not enough support or compassion for those whom have criminal records that can't get jobs because of and or even have there own name on a place of living or vehicle even if they were holding down a job and putting there lives back on track so why would I be agreed for closing
Don’t think there enough places for all of these people to go. Let them stay where they are with the services provided until there is a permanent safe stay place/solution.
The expenditure per person is outrageous..calculate per 190 residents!
Also what is the stated method to audit the success of this large spending of our taxes?
The non-unanimous jury was completely unconstitutional and Oregon fought hard to keep it, being the last state in the country to get rid of what was well known as a Jim Crow law. And yet Oregon continues to do things that are unconstitutional, such as not provide enough public defenders.
ReplyAnything else is Unconstitutional.
ReplyBecause a non-unanimous verdict means there is reasonable doubt
Replythe courts have no problem sending someone to prison for life with a simple majority, but 11-1 jury? Unconstitutional! P.S. He’s the obviously innocent nephew of Stephen Avery from Making A Murderer.
Reply