Do you think Elon Musk should have access to treasury department payment systems?

Asked by KTVZ

782 Votes

Do you think Elon Musk should have access to treasury department payment systems?

54%

Yes Yes

46%

No No

54%

Yes

3 Comments

Michael Caligure

President Trump gave Mr. Musk the authority to look at the budget

Rick McCollough

How best to find wasteful government spending than to go to the source of the payments. Musk isn’t going to stop or interfere with SS payments or any other social programs.

k san

He and his early 20-yr old hires already are making changes and have been given authority to those systems! It is a travesty!!

Latterdaysaint

Of course he should have access, DOGE has saved 100 million dollars so far!

46%

No

7 Comments

Susan Brock

Things are getting strange enough with now having a co-president.

Latterdaysaint

Elon musk and DOGE has about 100 million dollars so far!

k san

Absolutely not!! He is not elected and Trump has taken away the authority of many departments and given it to a man who made a Naze salute at the inauguration. He is unfit and should NOT be allowed anywhere near the levers of power!

k san

Can you say, "ZIPDRIVES"! Elon now owns all of US. We are all now being saved by the richest man on the planet..... Hallelujah!!!

Duane Wyman

No American 🇺🇲, elected Musk‼️

Michael McKay

That system is our most secure data system and a non elected, or person who has not been properly vetted should not have access to such a sensitive system.

Michael McKay

That system is our most secure data system and a non elected, or person who has not been properly vetted should not have access to such a sensitive system.

Do you think safe parking spots are a good way to combat the homelessness?

Asked by KTVZ

46 Votes

Do you think safe parking spots are a good way to combat the homelessness?

37%

YES YES

63%

NO NO

37%

YES

2 Comments

Charles Hemingway

Safe parking programs have a proven track record of successfully taking people from being homeless into having a place of their own. Safe parking programs cut down on costs to cities for ambulance calls, police calls, visits to emergency rooms and mental health crises that costs taxpayers money.

Duane Wyman

Perhaps? Hiding the un-housed in various random locations doesn't solve much. This is just another band-aid solution! Seems just the latest adaptation of "kicking the can down the road"...?

63%

NO

1 Comment

Kellie Beck Fletcher

Stop increasing rent 2026 passed 9.5 percent rent increase will push more people into being homeless .. where is the cap we are already paying ridiculous prices for rent how can anyone save for a home. Not sure why you people can’t figure this out You’re pushing Oregonians out.

Do you support the rule changes aimed at reducing light pollution in Central Oregon?

Asked by KTVZ

91 Votes

Do you support the rule changes aimed at reducing light pollution in Central Oregon?

70%

Yes Yes

30%

No No

70%

Yes

4 Comments

Jane CommunityMember

People should not have to put up with annoying intrusive lights that inconsiderate neighbors install

Chris Hill

Board Member of DarkSky Oregon who worked on this with Deschutes County. Currently working to update the 24 year old City of Bend lighting ordinance.

Thomas Orr

I like seeing stars at night. and birds migration is important.

Katherine GoldenEagle

We live across the street from a duplex that has one of those motion sensor lights on the garage. It's soooo bright it lights up my bedroom and my son's and our living room. Thats just ridiclous

30%

No

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

KTVZ

Do you think Elon Musk should have access to treasury department payment systems?

54% Yes Yes

46% No No

54% Yes

46% No

Do you think safe parking spots are a good way to combat the homelessness?

37% YES YES

63% NO NO

37% YES

63% NO

Do you support the rule changes aimed at reducing light pollution in Central Oregon?

70% Yes Yes

30% No No

70% Yes

30% No

54%

Yes Yes

46%

No No

54%

Yes

46%

No

37%

YES YES

63%

NO NO

37%

YES

63%

NO

70%

Yes Yes

30%

No No

70%

Yes

30%

No