KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Do you support piping canals to conserve water?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
760 Votes

Do you support piping canals to conserve water?

Yes, worth it!

5

No, it's an eyesore.

8

Yes, worth it!

5 Comments
Sara Huscher
0
Sara Huscher

Reduces water loss greatly

Reply
Gramma Jean
0
Gramma Jean

Our water in Central Oregon (and everywhere, really) is liquid gold. We need to take very good care of it.

Reply
Don Elsom
0
Don Elsom

Its the only way to improve the delivery of water to agriculture and help protect our streams and water dependent wildlife

Reply
P N West
0
P N West

We need to do what we can to conserve natural resources. The canals, although beautiful waste a lot of water.

Reply
Jim Van Osdell
0
Jim Van Osdell

There is a LOT of water lodd through various reasons including leaks and evaporation. Piping is a sensible action to take to address these issues. Energy savings is another benefit

Reply

No, it's an eyesore.

8 Comments
Mike Edson
3
Mike Edson

To expensive. everytime you cover up a water supply you destroy wildlife habitat.

Reply
Beverley Owens Callen
2
Beverley Owens Callen

Open canals in Central Oregon makes it what is- trees and greenery. Without them, only what is being watered will be green. It's a government money grab. Major fire hazard in a couple years.

Reply
Danni
0
Danni

I say QUIT building golf courses.

Reply
Pam W
0
Pam W

I love seeing the water running thru town. I don't agree that we lose as much water as they say without the piping. And it is too costly and time consuming to get done.

Reply
Sam Ackerman
0
Sam Ackerman

No, way to much cost. Oh the same amount of water would evaporate flowing through the canals then if the water was allowed to stay in the river flow.

Reply
Beverley Owens Callen
0
Beverley Owens Callen

As a Home owner's expense to lose is w/a lateral canal,beauty,trees, pond,cost of cleanup,dried up Wells, Property value loss,no notice,vote or say about our water rights that we purchased & own! NO!

Reply
Jim Latham
0
Jim Latham

irrigation ponds are not properly maintained and leaking water. People running their sprinklers in the same area for days wasting water. Wildlife and vegetation depend on this water.

Reply
TresMap_USA
0
TresMap_USA

I lived on the canal. Wildlife depend on the water too. Deer drink from it. Birds drink from it & swim in it. It's a freeway for birds! Water evaporates and comes back down. Only replace rotten pipes.

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
444 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

16

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

16 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jim Terry
1
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely NOT!! He was a racist extraordinaire and spread divisive speech and ideas.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply
Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT