Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Who's your Husker quarterback - Scott Frost or Eric Crouch?

Who's your Husker quarterback - Scott Frost or Eric Crouch?

Scott Frost

13

Eric Crouch

9

Scott Frost

13 Comments
Paul F Edwards
2
Paul F Edwards

He may not be as purely talented, but there is nothing but winning in Scott Frosts veins. He is a champion. That is why he'll be a fantastic head coach too. He is a winner. Simple as that.

Reply
Chuck Buchholz
1
Chuck Buchholz

Crouch could beat you with his legs but Frost was the best leader and the toughest.

Reply
Tony Bunting
1
Tony Bunting

Both were great, but Frost could do everything Crouch did and was more of a leader.

Reply
Randy Weitzenkamp
1
Randy Weitzenkamp

I'd go with Frost as he was a fierce competitor who wasn't afraid to run someone over when necessary. The national championship was icing on the cake. Why wasn't this Frazier vs Frost?

Reply
Alan Pattee
1
Alan Pattee

Actually I would do it Tommie Frazier

Reply
Ruben Ernesto Sandoval
Ruben Ernesto Sandoval

Agree, no offense but they're competing for second place after Touchdown Tommy.

Ron Joseph
1
Ron Joseph

Scott for leadership qualities, drive and toughness. While Eric was the better runner, Scott was the better option QB.

Reply
Gene Baker
1
Gene Baker

Scott Frost was just the better athlete and competitor. He the one with the undeafeated season and National Championship.

Reply
Randy Austin
1
Randy Austin

I believe he had just a little more drive

Reply
Frank Johnson
1
Frank Johnson

Could have picked either one and been happy. Scott wasn't as fast but I do believe he was the tougher runner.

Reply
Dave
1
Dave

One stat matters most.

Reply
Livio S Nespoli
1
Livio S Nespoli

He is a born winner who would do anything to win or help his team. Play offense or defense and do it well.

Reply
Wes Thrun
1
Wes Thrun

tough call for me, Scott Frost just had or has an attitude about him, he ran angry. I guess the question i would have is what would crouch have done with that 97 offensive line and coach Osborne

Reply

Eric Crouch

7 Comments
Joby Clauson
1
Joby Clauson

Eric Crouch had to carry the load of the offense. Scott was good too, but had better support and more weapons. Eric was faster, quicker as a runner, better instincts on the option. He also had better arm strength. Scott was bigger and stronger as a runner, a more vocal leader though. Close call

Reply
Doug Miller
0
Doug Miller

Tough call but Crouch with his legs.

Reply
Patrick Ryan
0
Patrick Ryan

They were both terrific, but if we are comparing players (not teams) - it isn't very close. Eric Crouch could carry a team; he wasn't just 'fast' - he was tough and had a great will to win.

Reply
Doug Daubert
0
Doug Daubert

Scott had a better team around him. I believe Crouch was the better athlete and overall quarterback. I would pick him as my QB. Now compare to Gill, Gdowski, Taylor, Frazier...

Reply
James Barnett
0
James Barnett

If Crouch played for Osborne he'd have had even a better career. Not knocking Solich but it was clear the team fell off after Tom Os' departure.

Reply
Greg Muller
0
Greg Muller

I guess Tommy F, is assumed to be preferred choice over either Frost or Crouch?

Reply
Patrick Ryan
Patrick Ryan

These are impossible questions, but Turner Gill is my all time favorite. He changed the position at Nebraska, and had the ideal combination of elusiveness, toughness, leadership, and passing skills.

What's your reaction to the Huskers' switch to rugby-style punting?

What's your reaction to the Huskers' switch to rugby-style punting?

Thumbs up

4

Thumbs down

1

Thumbs up

4 Comments
Larry Johnson
0
Larry Johnson

I do not care HOW the punting is done. Only that it leads to WINS.

Reply
Steve Rentzell
0
Steve Rentzell

If something is broken, what does it hurt to try something different. Insanity- Doing the same thing and expecting a different result.

Reply
Danny Purcell
0
Danny Purcell

taking full advantage of college rules

Reply
Ron Graf
0
Ron Graf

I like this style of punting. With the roll-out, it keeps the defense honest by keeping them in position in case of runs/throws by the punter.

Reply

Thumbs down

1 Comment
Mike O
0
Mike O

Anything less than a drop kick just isn't trying. Additionally, NU had a punter who averaged 44 yards a kick and he had to transfer for a player to be named later. Maybe get the rugby guy in and set in place before upending what would have been a solid punting game.

Reply
Will you be in Memorial Stadium for the "Husker Games" on April 26?

Will you be in Memorial Stadium for the "Husker Games" on April 26?

Yes: Must support the team.

0

No: It's a poor Spring Game substitute.

9

Yes: Must support the team.

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No: It's a poor Spring Game substitute.

9 Comments
Nate Stineman
0
Nate Stineman

Too much hassle (200 miles away) for an unknown event.

Reply
Tom Cullinan
0
Tom Cullinan

The event is a non-starter compared to the structure of actual plays and the support of young men working to find their place on the team.

Reply
Richard Johnson
0
Richard Johnson

No interest in 7-on-7.

Reply
Dan Larsen
0
Dan Larsen

Live in Dayton, Ohio! 800 miles one-way.... but I am a season ticket holder. See you during the season.

Reply
Ryan Goecke
0
Ryan Goecke

If I want to see a carnival or a faire I'll go see one. This change shows fear of being a competitor on the part of Rhule and NU Athletics. It's embarrassing.

Reply
Dave Kapke
0
Dave Kapke

I live in Colorado

Reply
Kent Haynes
0
Kent Haynes

I can see both sides. But it is losing a tradition.

Reply
Bruce Craig
0
Bruce Craig

Losing the best recruiting tool of the spring and losing the money it would bring in is not smart in my opinion.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

It's not a game. This was our tradition. Not a good decision on Rhule's part.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT