Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
7/14/2014

Who is more key to the success of the 2014 Husker football team?

34%
Ameer Abdullah

2

66%
Randy Gregory WINNER

9

34%
Ameer Abdullah

Who is more key to the success of the 2014 Husker football team?
2 Comments
Rob Powers
3
Rob Powers

Without Ameer the offense will depend too much on Armstrong.

Reply
Shelly Baker
0
Shelly Baker

Tommy Armstrong is not going to be able to carry the team. He will need a great Amer to control the defenses concentration. Tommy will make to many mistakes and unless Johnny Stanton is ready to take over the offence we will need a great Amer.

Reply

66%
Randy Gregory

Who is more key to the success of the 2014 Husker football team?
9 Comments
Michael Cosyn
11
Michael Cosyn

Bo's defenses as of late have been downright offensive, so defense is more important than offense at this point.

Reply
Bart Burroughs
8
Bart Burroughs

if it's true that defense wins championships then by default, gregory is more important.

Reply
Visitor
2
Visitor

He'll be the leader on defense and set the tone. Ameer is great, but we're pretty deep at running back…not DE.

Reply
Rick Jameson
1
Rick Jameson

Plenty of good backs

Reply
Vance A. Herbek
1
Vance A. Herbek

Randy Gregory is more important because players like him at his position are hard to come by and defense wins championships. I love Ameer Abdullah but we have backs behind him that can be weapons on our offense. We have a stable of running backs.

Reply
Visitor
1
Visitor

We have other running backs, not as good but there is more depth behind Ameer, then there is on the defense side behind Gregory.

Reply
Bill Weber
0
Bill Weber

We have a plethora of very good backs but are thin at defensive end.

Reply
Jack Gillam
0
Jack Gillam

Love both players but defenceman needs to be dominate this year.

Reply
Erik Olson
0
Erik Olson

Backups and impact on respective unit

Reply
Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

They're getting better.

5

Needs more work.

10

They're getting better.

5 Comments
Kevin T
0
Kevin T

Running game is improving

Reply
Eric Hahn
0
Eric Hahn

I think without getting cute and simplifying we were able to see the talent that was recruited on the line shine against Wisconsin. There were holes open nearly all night for our backs. Dylan was not sacked at all.

Reply
klirvine@bresnan.net
0
klirvine@bresnan.net

they are better no question

Reply
Will Stanley
0
Will Stanley

Tonite I saw hints of the '95 Huskers. We have a lot of work to do but I think with Rhule and Holgerson, I think within the next 2-3 seasons, we will be on the ranking polls and pushing for the Big 10 Legends title and then? Who knows? Maybe a National title is in the future??

Reply

Needs more work.

10 Comments
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

I think a good 'running' OC like Army's OC could have an awesome offense with this exact personnel. And the Army's OC only makes $190K.

Reply
Steve Brandon
0
Steve Brandon

Only thing good at is picking up qb after giving up a sack

Reply
Bruce Stephens
0
Bruce Stephens

There are some good high school defenses that would give our line fits.

Reply
Fearless Phil
0
Fearless Phil

I was spoiled by the lines of the 80s and 90s

Reply
Joe Hegarty
0
Joe Hegarty

They need more strength & conditioning

Reply
Mike O
0
Mike O

Offensive is the right word. The Pipeline is clogged and needs a plumber ASAP. The you know what is backing up into the basement. That Focker is our offensive line.

Reply
James Key
0
James Key

I don't care at this moment. just win Baby

Reply
Michael DePuglio
0
Michael DePuglio

Take a look at the average SEC OL.... we need more work and development.

Reply
Brian Machan
0
Brian Machan

We need a complete overhaul of personnel. Coaching is there, talent isn't.

Reply
Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Exciting change for better

8

Skeptical of sudden shift

3

Exciting change for better

7 Comments
Don Buckingham
0
Don Buckingham

Glad to see an acknowledgement that the O wasn't working. This shows some urgency about winning which I appreciate.

Reply
Bill Greim
0
Bill Greim

Seems pretty obvious that when something is not working very well and you don’t know how to fix it you bring in outside experts for advise. Common practice.

Reply
Brad Bredenkamp
0
Brad Bredenkamp

Holgerson has enough experience that he should be able to watch some film and the players in practice and call plays that play to their strengths. I'm betting he is also smart enough to stick with what's working until the other team stops it, and to develop some offensive rhythm.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

Anything is better than Satterfield. But I don't know why we didn't go after the US Army's OC who only makes $190k and absolutely knows how to run the ball.

Reply
Brad Bredenkamp
Brad Bredenkamp

Because Army's OC can call the triple option and run the ball, but he probably doesn't know how to call for a pro-style quarterback. Plus it is very unlikely that Army's OC is going to jump ship right now the way their season is going. Maybe gets a look after the season if Holgerson doesn't stay.

Dick Plock
0
Dick Plock

Needed change for quite a many games. Our offensive & defense coordinators are being out smarted.

Reply
Jean McGee
0
Jean McGee

Satt has been wasting Raiola’s passing strength.

Reply

Skeptical of sudden shift

3 Comments
VAHuskerFan
1
VAHuskerFan

I refuse to get my hopes up

Reply
Craig S
1
Craig S

Installing a whole new offense would be very difficult. You might be able to refine a small portion but learning the timing and terminology would be difficult.

Reply
michael daly
0
michael daly

The habits of almost 2 years don't change overnight. That being said, A new , more forceful, high expectation coach, might be able to snap them awake and Go

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT