Asked by Husker Max

1/15/2015

Who deserves enshrinement into the College Football HOF more?

43%

Trev Alberts

57%

Eric Crouch WINNER

43%

Trev Alberts

3 Comments

Ron Huffman

At first I felt Eric had a whiner attitude. .but I realized that he felt he was the strongest man to lead the team. ...Either way both deserve recognition. .

Bob Dickson

Personally; I don't like either of them but Eric is a quitter. Don't care that he won the heisman. He ran home to mommy because Bobby Newcombe got the start and he also wasn't tough enough to cut it in the NFL

Nathan Turner

Snyder is very overrated...played 5 creampuffs before losing every year to Oklahoma and Nebraska. Crouch is also just as deserving as Alberts in my opinion on how he changed the QB position along with Vick during that time.

57%

Eric Crouch

5 Comments

Alan Blackburn

Outstanding hands-on contributor to NU victories, more so than TA. TA screwed the UNO athletic program by dropping the DII championship wrestling program. No respect for TA.

Danny Baker

I like him.

Keith Petrie

You're kidding right? Trev was good But he wasn't Eric Crouch! Heisman... That says it all!

Joseph Schumacher

Heisman

Visitor

Better athlete/leader, difference maker.

Asked by Husker Max

72 Votes

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

42%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

58%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

42%

They're getting better.

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

58%

Needs more work.

2 Comments

Michael DePuglio

Take a look at the average SEC OL.... we need more work and development.

Brian Machan

We need a complete overhaul of personnel. Coaching is there, talent isn't.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Asked by Husker Max

719 Votes

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

69%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69%

Exciting change for better

7 Comments

Don Buckingham

Glad to see an acknowledgement that the O wasn't working. This shows some urgency about winning which I appreciate.

Bill Greim

Seems pretty obvious that when something is not working very well and you don’t know how to fix it you bring in outside experts for advise. Common practice.

Brad Bredenkamp

Holgerson has enough experience that he should be able to watch some film and the players in practice and call plays that play to their strengths. I'm betting he is also smart enough to stick with what's working until the other team stops it, and to develop some offensive rhythm.

Robert Lloyd

Anything is better than Satterfield. But I don't know why we didn't go after the US Army's OC who only makes $190k and absolutely knows how to run the ball.

Brad Bredenkamp

Because Army's OC can call the triple option and run the ball, but he probably doesn't know how to call for a pro-style quarterback. Plus it is very unlikely that Army's OC is going to jump ship right now the way their season is going. Maybe gets a look after the season if Holgerson doesn't stay.

Dick Plock

Needed change for quite a many games. Our offensive & defense coordinators are being out smarted.

Jean McGee

Satt has been wasting Raiola’s passing strength.

klirvine@bresnan.net

we need an offence

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift

3 Comments

VAHuskerFan

I refuse to get my hopes up

Craig S

Installing a whole new offense would be very difficult. You might be able to refine a small portion but learning the timing and terminology would be difficult.

michael daly

The habits of almost 2 years don't change overnight. That being said, A new , more forceful, high expectation coach, might be able to snap them awake and Go

Husker Max

Who deserves enshrinement into the College Football HOF more?

43% Trev Alberts

57% Eric Crouch WINNER

43% Trev Alberts

57% Eric Crouch

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

42% They're getting better. They're getting better.

58% Needs more work. Needs more work.

42% They're getting better.

58% Needs more work.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

69% Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31% Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69% Exciting change for better

31% Skeptical of sudden shift

43%

Trev Alberts

57%

Eric Crouch WINNER

43%

Trev Alberts

57%

Eric Crouch

42%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

58%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

42%

They're getting better.

58%

Needs more work.

69%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69%

Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift