Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
3/12/2016

Which running strategy would you prefer to see in 2016?

56%
RB by Committee WINNER

15

44%
One Back Approach

5

56%
RB by Committee

15 Comments
DHUSK
6
DHUSK

Too much talent to be wasted sitting these guys. Give the rock to Wilbon and Ozigbo and Newby. Add in Spielman and DPE too.

Reply
Robert Dodd
0
Robert Dodd

there is alot of talent why not use it ALL !!

Reply
Stephen Johnson
0
Stephen Johnson

We will have a qb that cannot run. So only one back is not enough options.

Reply
Jerry Williams
0
Jerry Williams

initially by committee until we find out if we have that one back that can emerge from the back. It is too early to tell.

Reply
John DeCastro
0
John DeCastro

talent is key. If you don't have an every down back, don't force somebody into that role

Reply
Tom Duncan
0
Tom Duncan

Lots of good backs. I want to see Adam Taylor used. He is a beast!

Reply
Paul Hrnicek
0
Paul Hrnicek

Distributed workload prevents one guy from wearing down as season progresses

Reply
Brian Reilly
0
Brian Reilly

If we run the ball 35-40 times a game we need more than 1 IB to step it up.

Reply
Scott RideOn
0
Scott RideOn

Why recruit them to sit on the bench. Just find/hire an OC who knows something about it!

Reply
Visitor
0
Visitor

give the ball to the hot hand

Reply
Michael Morkert
0
Michael Morkert

We need to use the fullback like the end of last year.Also running 60% or more requires a committee approach.

Reply
Kurt Boeckenhauer
0
Kurt Boeckenhauer

Back in the day Thurman Thomas and Barry Sanders were both on the roster for OSU. Would you have left Thomas ride the bench? Now we aren't blessed with that depth, but both are solid. Fresh legs matter!

Reply
Visitor
0
Visitor

Newby has the most talent...but that kid Ozigbo has great vision!! I would start Ozigbo

Reply

44%
One Back Approach

5 Comments
Christopher Richling
0
Christopher Richling

Must be the right back though. WIth their ability to get yards as the primary motivating factor rather than their ability to pass protect.

Reply
Jason Stephens
0
Jason Stephens

I feel it gives the back the reps he needs to get into rhythm and grow throughout the year

Reply
Alan Lancaster
0
Alan Lancaster

To build some continuity in the run game

Reply
Keith Petrie
0
Keith Petrie

However... It would depend on how things go in any game. If a couple of backs do the job great also. But if one guy with a fullback and or another back can do it... Fine.

Reply
David MacKay
0
David MacKay

One back approach is the best with a back to give spells when needed...look at Abdullah..that's what we need to go to

Reply
Are you in favor of college football's 85-scholarship limit?

Are you in favor of college football's 85-scholarship limit?

Yes

4

No

1

Yes

4 Comments
Chris Monaco
0
Chris Monaco

the big programs will thrive while the rest survive, with no limit its all about Money then

Reply
Steve Walker
0
Steve Walker

If open, rich schools like Ohio State and Texas would have 300 players on their rooster, which would impact the recruit pool. Of course those who don't play would end up in transfer portal. The scholarship limits helps all schools access to good players. Even with NIL, the scholarship limit helps

Reply
Steve Walker
0
Steve Walker

If open, rich schools like Ohio State and Texas would have 300 players on their rooster, which would impact the recruit pool. Of course those who don't play would end up in transfer portal. The scholarship limits helps all schools access to good players. Even with NIL, the scholarship limit helps

Reply
Scott Ferguson
0
Scott Ferguson

Seems fair for the number of kids that actually play in games.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Visitor
0
Visitor

Most players don't get to go pro. As a former college walkon, being an athlete and having the $ to pay for college and other things is a huge burden. There is too much as a full time student and athlete to work as well. Opening more scholarships give more kids as much opportunity as possible.

Reply
Do you support the proposal to sell alcohol at Haymarket Park?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
1 month left

Do you support the proposal to sell alcohol at Haymarket Park?

Yes

4

No

7

Yes

4 Comments
Dick Plock
0
Dick Plock

Baseball, hotdogs, popcorn, pretzels 🍺 beer

Reply
Clark Huenink
0
Clark Huenink

Fan friendly environment.

Reply
Scott Ferguson
0
Scott Ferguson

All things in moderation. A cold beer and a hotdog are part of baseball fandom. And yes, revenue.

Reply
Kent Haynes
0
Kent Haynes

It's everywhere else, plus the revenue

Reply

No

7 Comments
Paco
0
Paco

I don't like what alcohol does to Husker fans.

Reply
Ralph J. Williams
0
Ralph J. Williams

Outcome is only negative.

Reply
Linda Ogren
0
Linda Ogren

NOT GOING TO ATTEND ANYMORE, YOU ARE ASKING FOR BIG TROUBLE

Reply
Roy VanPelt
0
Roy VanPelt

Alcohol will ruin the family environment. I love my Huskers, but may have to give up our season tickets if they ever start selling beer at Memorial Stadium.

Reply
Roy VanPelt
0
Roy VanPelt

Alcohol will ruin the family environment. I love my Huskers, but may have to give up our season tickets if they ever start selling beer at Memorial Stadium.

Reply
James Wyatt
0
James Wyatt

People sometimes are not responsible enough and over drink then get into a vehicle!

Reply
Roy Katskee
0
Roy Katskee

Underage college students have enough access to beer. Absolutely no need for it.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT