Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
3/12/2016

Which running strategy would you prefer to see in 2016?

56%
RB by Committee WINNER

15

44%
One Back Approach

5

56%
RB by Committee

15 Comments
DHUSK
6
DHUSK

Too much talent to be wasted sitting these guys. Give the rock to Wilbon and Ozigbo and Newby. Add in Spielman and DPE too.

Reply
Robert Dodd
0
Robert Dodd

there is alot of talent why not use it ALL !!

Reply
Stephen Johnson
0
Stephen Johnson

We will have a qb that cannot run. So only one back is not enough options.

Reply
Jerry Williams
0
Jerry Williams

initially by committee until we find out if we have that one back that can emerge from the back. It is too early to tell.

Reply
John DeCastro
0
John DeCastro

talent is key. If you don't have an every down back, don't force somebody into that role

Reply
Tom Duncan
0
Tom Duncan

Lots of good backs. I want to see Adam Taylor used. He is a beast!

Reply
Paul Hrnicek
0
Paul Hrnicek

Distributed workload prevents one guy from wearing down as season progresses

Reply
Brian Reilly
0
Brian Reilly

If we run the ball 35-40 times a game we need more than 1 IB to step it up.

Reply
Scott RideOn
0
Scott RideOn

Why recruit them to sit on the bench. Just find/hire an OC who knows something about it!

Reply
Visitor
0
Visitor

give the ball to the hot hand

Reply
Michael Morkert
0
Michael Morkert

We need to use the fullback like the end of last year.Also running 60% or more requires a committee approach.

Reply
Kurt Boeckenhauer
0
Kurt Boeckenhauer

Back in the day Thurman Thomas and Barry Sanders were both on the roster for OSU. Would you have left Thomas ride the bench? Now we aren't blessed with that depth, but both are solid. Fresh legs matter!

Reply
Visitor
0
Visitor

Newby has the most talent...but that kid Ozigbo has great vision!! I would start Ozigbo

Reply

44%
One Back Approach

5 Comments
Christopher Richling
0
Christopher Richling

Must be the right back though. WIth their ability to get yards as the primary motivating factor rather than their ability to pass protect.

Reply
Jason Stephens
0
Jason Stephens

I feel it gives the back the reps he needs to get into rhythm and grow throughout the year

Reply
Alan Lancaster
0
Alan Lancaster

To build some continuity in the run game

Reply
Keith Petrie
0
Keith Petrie

However... It would depend on how things go in any game. If a couple of backs do the job great also. But if one guy with a fullback and or another back can do it... Fine.

Reply
David MacKay
0
David MacKay

One back approach is the best with a back to give spells when needed...look at Abdullah..that's what we need to go to

Reply
What's your reaction to the Huskers' switch to rugby-style punting?

What's your reaction to the Huskers' switch to rugby-style punting?

Thumbs up

4

Thumbs down

1

Thumbs up

4 Comments
Larry Johnson
0
Larry Johnson

I do not care HOW the punting is done. Only that it leads to WINS.

Reply
Steve Rentzell
0
Steve Rentzell

If something is broken, what does it hurt to try something different. Insanity- Doing the same thing and expecting a different result.

Reply
Danny Purcell
0
Danny Purcell

taking full advantage of college rules

Reply
Ron Graf
0
Ron Graf

I like this style of punting. With the roll-out, it keeps the defense honest by keeping them in position in case of runs/throws by the punter.

Reply

Thumbs down

1 Comment
Mike O
0
Mike O

Anything less than a drop kick just isn't trying. Additionally, NU had a punter who averaged 44 yards a kick and he had to transfer for a player to be named later. Maybe get the rugby guy in and set in place before upending what would have been a solid punting game.

Reply
Will you be in Memorial Stadium for the "Husker Games" on April 26?

Will you be in Memorial Stadium for the "Husker Games" on April 26?

Yes: Must support the team.

0

No: It's a poor Spring Game substitute.

9

Yes: Must support the team.

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No: It's a poor Spring Game substitute.

9 Comments
Nate Stineman
0
Nate Stineman

Too much hassle (200 miles away) for an unknown event.

Reply
Tom Cullinan
0
Tom Cullinan

The event is a non-starter compared to the structure of actual plays and the support of young men working to find their place on the team.

Reply
Richard Johnson
0
Richard Johnson

No interest in 7-on-7.

Reply
Dan Larsen
0
Dan Larsen

Live in Dayton, Ohio! 800 miles one-way.... but I am a season ticket holder. See you during the season.

Reply
Ryan Goecke
0
Ryan Goecke

If I want to see a carnival or a faire I'll go see one. This change shows fear of being a competitor on the part of Rhule and NU Athletics. It's embarrassing.

Reply
Dave Kapke
0
Dave Kapke

I live in Colorado

Reply
Kent Haynes
0
Kent Haynes

I can see both sides. But it is losing a tradition.

Reply
Bruce Craig
0
Bruce Craig

Losing the best recruiting tool of the spring and losing the money it would bring in is not smart in my opinion.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

It's not a game. This was our tradition. Not a good decision on Rhule's part.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT