What it will lead to is kids not learning how to commit and see it through, a VERY important life skill. In all careers, there are down times and hurdles to get over. They won't. Entitled!
Reply
Promotes coaches raiding other programs and dropping their current athletes that have not performed as expected.
Reply
Asked by
Husker Max
Because know the Huskers have a true chance to win now that Utah doesn't have they're coach.
Reply
Yes, especially when you combine the upheaval this causes with a few of their opt outs and departures. It's one of the reasons bowl games just aren't the same anymore. The record might say we're playing the 15th ranked team, but in reality, we're playing what's left of it. Glorified scrimmage gm!
Reply
I would say it gives Nebraska a BETTER chance for a bowl win… I wouldn’t go so far as to say that it gives Nebraska a GOOD chance for a bowl win. 🙄
Reply
The Utes could have Ernest P. Worrell coaching them and they'd still throttle us.
Reply
His replacement has been around the program since he played there under Whittingham. The transition will be smooth.
Reply
His replacement has been around the program since he played there under Whittingham. The transistion will be smooth.
Reply
I think the only altered mindset might be the Utes will be angry and looking to show Whittingham they are as good without him as they were under him
Reply
Asked by
Husker Max
I think the transfer of one time with no restrictions is fine. More than that is not healthy for the athlete.
ReplyCoaches leave as soon as it suits their best interests. Why should student athletes be held to a different standard?
ReplyAs long as there are strict rules and penalties against coaches contacting other teams players.
ReplyWhy should coaches be able to leave but not players?
ReplyWe ask 18 year old students to make major life decisions. Then punish them if they decide they made a poor choice. Should we make adult coaches sit out a year whey they decide to change schools?
ReplyGotta be equal with the other student athletes
Reply