Asked by Husker Max

11/25/2013

Should Ameer Abdullah be in the Heisman conversation?

70%

Yes WINNER

30%

No

70%

Yes

Should Ameer Abdullah be in the Heisman conversation?

Ameer is virtually tied with Ka'Deem Carey for total yards gained (1527/1531), ESPN's lone RB on their "Heisman Watch" depth chart. He also leads Carey in yards per carry and ha... Show More

Ameer is virtually tied with Ka'Deem Carey for total yards gained (1527/1531), ESPN's lone RB on their "Heisman Watch" depth chart. He also leads Carey in yards per carry and has led his team to a winning record in conference play. http://es.pn/19kUD2y (Photo: Lincoln Journal Star) Show Less

3 Comments

Shelly Baker

because his season demands it. He is very important to the huskers.

Ashley Guinan

It shouldn't be only a QB award, or an award given to the best offensive player on the best team. AA has done more with less than anyone in the country.

Ruthie Patterson

because he is the best

30%

No

It's a QB year for the Heisman race, so there's bound to be some running backs that get pushed out of the conversation. http://es.pn/19kUD2y

It's a QB year for the Heisman race, so there's bound to be some running backs that get pushed out of the conversation. http://es.pn/19kUD2y Show Less

1 Comment

Drew

Good but not Heisman worthy.. Too few td's. Too few special plays.

Asked by Husker Max

39 Votes

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

44%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

56%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

44%

They're getting better.

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

56%

Needs more work.

1 Comment

Brian Machan

We need a complete overhaul of personnel. Coaching is there, talent isn't.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Asked by Husker Max

719 Votes

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

69%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69%

Exciting change for better

7 Comments

Don Buckingham

Glad to see an acknowledgement that the O wasn't working. This shows some urgency about winning which I appreciate.

Bill Greim

Seems pretty obvious that when something is not working very well and you don’t know how to fix it you bring in outside experts for advise. Common practice.

Brad Bredenkamp

Holgerson has enough experience that he should be able to watch some film and the players in practice and call plays that play to their strengths. I'm betting he is also smart enough to stick with what's working until the other team stops it, and to develop some offensive rhythm.

Robert Lloyd

Anything is better than Satterfield. But I don't know why we didn't go after the US Army's OC who only makes $190k and absolutely knows how to run the ball.

Brad Bredenkamp

Because Army's OC can call the triple option and run the ball, but he probably doesn't know how to call for a pro-style quarterback. Plus it is very unlikely that Army's OC is going to jump ship right now the way their season is going. Maybe gets a look after the season if Holgerson doesn't stay.

Dick Plock

Needed change for quite a many games. Our offensive & defense coordinators are being out smarted.

Jean McGee

Satt has been wasting Raiola’s passing strength.

klirvine@bresnan.net

we need an offence

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift

3 Comments

VAHuskerFan

I refuse to get my hopes up

Craig S

Installing a whole new offense would be very difficult. You might be able to refine a small portion but learning the timing and terminology would be difficult.

michael daly

The habits of almost 2 years don't change overnight. That being said, A new , more forceful, high expectation coach, might be able to snap them awake and Go

Husker Max

Should Ameer Abdullah be in the Heisman conversation?

70% Yes WINNER

30% No

70% Yes

30% No

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

44% They're getting better. They're getting better.

56% Needs more work. Needs more work.

44% They're getting better.

56% Needs more work.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

69% Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31% Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69% Exciting change for better

31% Skeptical of sudden shift

70%

Yes WINNER

30%

No

70%

Yes

30%

No

44%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

56%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

44%

They're getting better.

56%

Needs more work.

69%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69%

Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift