Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Feel better about the Husker's progress after the OSU game?

Feel better about the Husker's progress after the OSU game?

Progress is there

11

No, not seeing it

1

Progress is there

11 Comments
Michael Sanches
0
Michael Sanches

Liked what I saw.

Reply
Randy Weitzenkamp
0
Randy Weitzenkamp

Didn't get man handled like last year. S&C is finally paying dividends. We still need to clean up things in the area of penalties and execution.

Reply
Chuck Lawson
0
Chuck Lawson

Team looked bigger. Offensive line seems stronger. A few playmakers on both sides. Not real crazy about playing so soft in defensive backfield but guess they did not want to get beat deep. Hopeful!

Reply
David Cassiday
0
David Cassiday

Effort - they played hard till the end, which they haven't always done the last two years.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

We saw for the first time in years our players showing they can play with anybody. We need some running backs, but then we are good to go.

Reply
Steve Walker
0
Steve Walker

Progress was there in terms of tackling, O/D line play, good offense decision making, and overall depth. No progress in turnovers and bad penalties and being our own worst enemy.

Reply
Ron Joseph
0
Ron Joseph

I see hope. Let's add consistency to hope and we should turn some heads this year. We need to stop the mental errors (time mgmt, fumbles, penalties). There is no margin of error. Fix these =Progress

Reply
Matt Seiler
0
Matt Seiler

Even the announcers who normally hate us saw progress. Nebraska won the trenches half of the time, offense got north and south quick, linebacker play was solid finally. This team is much improved

Reply
Bob Berg
0
Bob Berg

Could have been 38-31. Should have been 45-31. But was 52-17. For every 10 good snaps there's always one drive killer. Glad that the offense went North to south and limited the sideline play. GBR

Reply
Marty Wilcox
0
Marty Wilcox

It's all about the big uglies in the trenches, and they have vastly improved.

Reply
Tucker Mcmann
0
Tucker Mcmann

Progress is there but quite honestly the celebrating of moral victories against upper echelon teams is getting a bit tired. 52 -17 is 52-17. Its a thrashing.

Reply

No, not seeing it

1 Comment
Tom Nelsen
0
Tom Nelsen

Hard to tell getting blown out yet again. I'll hope to see the improvement against lesser competition that will hopefully result in wins.

Reply
Will Fred Hoiberg's Huskers still be undefeated when the calendar flips to February?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
1 month left

Will Fred Hoiberg's Huskers still be undefeated when the calendar flips to February?

Yes

1

No

8

Yes

1 Comment
Gary Wall
0
Gary Wall

I HOPE! CAN WE HOPE!

Reply

No

8 Comments
Robert Schutt
0
Robert Schutt

With 3 of the remaining 4 January games on the road, it will be an uphill climb in remaining playoff undefeated.

Reply
Terrence Smith
0
Terrence Smith

... and I hope I'm wrong.

Reply
VAHuskerFan
0
VAHuskerFan

They r playing really well but I just don’t see them winning out in January, they live and die by the 3 and it’s gonna end up costing them, not much inside the paint game. I see everyone standing outside the 3 line wanting to shoot the 3 but no one ever inside to get rebounds, wont work against Mich

Reply
Suicide Slush Puppie
0
Suicide Slush Puppie

Probably not - that's expecting a lot - but regardless, what they've accomplished is nothing short of extraordinary.

Reply
Jerry Goodwin
0
Jerry Goodwin

This team is really good and they will continue to give themselves a chance in every game, but...3 of the next 4 on the road, including Michigan? That's a tough run. If they win out in January and beat Illinois at home on February 1st, they'll be #1 in the country the next day.

Reply
Roy Katskee
0
Roy Katskee

They are living on borrowed time.

Reply
What should define Nebraska’s running back room heading into 2026?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
1 month left

What should define Nebraska’s running back room heading into 2026?

One clear feature back

3

A situational committee

4

One clear feature back

3 Comments
David Weaver
0
David Weaver

Feature back is important to have but DEPTH is also CRITICAL. If don't have a feature back then either then depth chart is flooded with talent. But in the Big Ten you better have a GREAT 2nd and 3rd string to make it through the season. With EJ it helped he was so quick he didn't take huge hits

Reply
Terry Barker
0
Terry Barker

Nebraska was always most stable when we had a feature back that can actually "carry" the team with his legs.

Reply
Ron Joseph
0
Ron Joseph

Nebraska in the past was successful with one top back. We've fallen on hard times because we haven't developed or recruited a great back. But the others need to be developed so we have a pipeline of backs like we use to have.

Reply

A situational committee

4 Comments
Thomas Wright
0
Thomas Wright

Roger Craig & Tom Rathman ring a bell ? Not only a dynamic duo playing for NU, but also for the 49ers !! YES we want multiple RB’s to rotate in & out to keep their legs fresh!! GBR 🎈

Reply
SEW
0
SEW

Look at the success in the playoff, the teams have 2-3 capable RB's they use to keep them healthy and offer the D different looks. Johnson was unique, most backs can't take that many snaps a season and stay healthy and sharp.

Reply
PJ SAid
0
PJ SAid

Every good team, including the NFL, will rotate backs on a regular basis. This last year Nebraska should have used a 2nd running back more often - NEB is lucked out EJ stayed healthy.

Reply
Brad Loseke
0
Brad Loseke

Different backs have skills for different situations.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT