Asked by Husker Max

1/21/2017

Do you trust preseason polls?

7%

Yes

93%

No WINNER

7%

Yes

"Preseason polls are fun. They give fans something to debate and provide fodder for message boards and sports talk radio shows during the final months before kickoff."

"Preseason polls are fun. They give fans something to debate and provide fodder for message boards and sports talk radio shows during the final months before kickoff." Show Less

1 Comment

Plenty Fi

Yay!

93%

No

"When comparing the preseason polls of Power Five conferences over the last five years, the media earn an overwhelming F." Read More: http://squareoffs.co/2asmRD0

"When comparing the preseason polls of Power Five conferences over the last five years, the media earn an overwhelming F." Read More: http://squareoffs.co/2asmRD0 Show Less

5 Comments

Jeremy Greer

They are pretty subjective with little data taken into account....how could they be anything other than an opinion.

Valerie Gilmore

Its a popularity poll. Several years ago there was a team completely off of the radar, and they some how made the top ten. Nope, it;s just something to write about and sell.

Robert Hegler

You play the game to see who wins. Polls are a hideous, unproven, and out dated method to determine anything. You bring your players, I'll bring mine. The win on the field is what counts, not someone's opinion, especially the opinions of sports writers and TV commentators. Need a 16 team playoff

Stephen Johnson

I predict 5 losses fo Nebr this year. Doubt they will be ranked.

Alan Blackburn

I don't trust political polls, why would I trust media polls. Everything is based on what you did the previous year!

Asked by Husker Max

675 Votes

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

44%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

56%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

44%

They're getting better.

5 Comments

Kevin T

Running game is improving

Eric Hahn

I think without getting cute and simplifying we were able to see the talent that was recruited on the line shine against Wisconsin. There were holes open nearly all night for our backs. Dylan was not sacked at all.

klirvine@bresnan.net

they are better no question

Bill Petty

yes

Will Stanley

Tonite I saw hints of the '95 Huskers. We have a lot of work to do but I think with Rhule and Holgerson, I think within the next 2-3 seasons, we will be on the ranking polls and pushing for the Big 10 Legends title and then? Who knows? Maybe a National title is in the future??

56%

Needs more work.

10 Comments

Robert Lloyd

I think a good 'running' OC like Army's OC could have an awesome offense with this exact personnel. And the Army's OC only makes $190K.

Steve Brandon

Only thing good at is picking up qb after giving up a sack

Jeffrey Bushman

actually they stink.

Bruce Stephens

There are some good high school defenses that would give our line fits.

Fearless Phil

I was spoiled by the lines of the 80s and 90s

Joe Hegarty

They need more strength & conditioning

Mike O

Offensive is the right word. The Pipeline is clogged and needs a plumber ASAP. The you know what is backing up into the basement. That Focker is our offensive line.

James Key

I don't care at this moment. just win Baby

Michael DePuglio

Take a look at the average SEC OL.... we need more work and development.

Brian Machan

We need a complete overhaul of personnel. Coaching is there, talent isn't.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Asked by Husker Max

737 Votes

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

70%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

30%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

70%

Exciting change for better

7 Comments

Don Buckingham

Glad to see an acknowledgement that the O wasn't working. This shows some urgency about winning which I appreciate.

Bill Greim

Seems pretty obvious that when something is not working very well and you don’t know how to fix it you bring in outside experts for advise. Common practice.

Brad Bredenkamp

Holgerson has enough experience that he should be able to watch some film and the players in practice and call plays that play to their strengths. I'm betting he is also smart enough to stick with what's working until the other team stops it, and to develop some offensive rhythm.

Robert Lloyd

Anything is better than Satterfield. But I don't know why we didn't go after the US Army's OC who only makes $190k and absolutely knows how to run the ball.

Brad Bredenkamp

Because Army's OC can call the triple option and run the ball, but he probably doesn't know how to call for a pro-style quarterback. Plus it is very unlikely that Army's OC is going to jump ship right now the way their season is going. Maybe gets a look after the season if Holgerson doesn't stay.

Dick Plock

Needed change for quite a many games. Our offensive & defense coordinators are being out smarted.

Jean McGee

Satt has been wasting Raiola’s passing strength.

klirvine@bresnan.net

we need an offence

30%

Skeptical of sudden shift

3 Comments

VAHuskerFan

I refuse to get my hopes up

Craig S

Installing a whole new offense would be very difficult. You might be able to refine a small portion but learning the timing and terminology would be difficult.

michael daly

The habits of almost 2 years don't change overnight. That being said, A new , more forceful, high expectation coach, might be able to snap them awake and Go

Husker Max

Do you trust preseason polls?

7% Yes

93% No WINNER

7% Yes

93% No

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

44% They're getting better. They're getting better.

56% Needs more work. Needs more work.

44% They're getting better.

56% Needs more work.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

70% Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

30% Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

70% Exciting change for better

30% Skeptical of sudden shift

7%

Yes

93%

No WINNER

7%

Yes

93%

No

44%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

56%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

44%

They're getting better.

56%

Needs more work.

70%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

30%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

70%

Exciting change for better

30%

Skeptical of sudden shift